Megalodon said:Acro, wow, just noticed you were a Beautiful British Columbian.
Megalodon said:It says so on our license plates so it must be true.![]()
I din't know that, now, I understand
Dgen, what gallery are you looking at?
Top of every post is a series of icons, one is a camera. If the camera lenz is blue, like Acro's is, that means there are pictures there, click the camera to view that user's pix. If the lenz is white, as yours is, that means there are no pix there to see![]()
Top of every post is a series of icons, one is a camera. If the camera lenz is blue, like Acro's is, that means there are pictures there, click the camera to view that user's pix. If the lenz is white, as yours is, that means there are no pix there to see
ReeferAl said:This all makes me wonder-could the results of Dr Shimek's salt mix toxicity study have been due in part to a bad batch of IO salt? He doesn't mention any cloudiness in the mixed water, but some of the tested samples have not had quite the extreme alkalinity problems seen in others and maybe these do not show the characteristic cloudiness?
Fuzzy said:Hi All,
I just came across this thread but haven't had time to read it all. So hopefully I won't cause any grief.......... but here goes.
About 8 weeks ago I did my monthly 10% water change with RO/DI water and a new bag of IO salt. We had been fighting a red cyano problem for the last few months, and were finally winning. I had been very careful about water changes, increasing the flow in our tank, and replacing all the bulbs
Megalodon said:I thought a dKH between 7 and 10 was perfect??
In anycase, I'm sure that depends on who you talk to. IMO, anything that isn't between 5 and 14 dKH should make you wonder. Why the inconsistancies? All IO salt should have the same alkalinity that falls within normal limits.