<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11224351#post11224351 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hatfielj
I don't really like the looks of a barebottom tank. Very unnatural and a lot of junk tends to cake up on the bottom. That's personal preference though and really it only matters what you like.
The other thing that I think alot of people over look is that even a shallow sand bed is beneficial for housing all sorts of beneficial worms, bugs, and bacteria. I really think its a more complete mini eco system.
The health of our corals and fish should be our #1 priority IMO. Providing a more complete ecosystem with a sand bed somewhere in the system is a better idea IME, but it can be done either way.
You only have junk caking if you don't have correct flow. With enough flow or flow pointing in the right places, nothing ever makes it to the bottom.
If you have a shallow sand bed, and it exists without flow hitting it such that it moves, anything else like poop will collect and decay in the sand bed. If some critter shifts the sand over the top of poop, you have a nutrient trap. Bare bottom, all that poop flies around and gets into your skimmer eventually (hopefully your skimmer works well).
also, shallow sand beds *can* house worms, bugs, bacteria, but the majority will be housed in your live rock anyway. Your shallow sand bed is basically just another rock. So no, your short sand bed won't add anything your live rock won't already.
complete mini ecosystem, far from it, even with a short sand bed. =P Have you looked at the real ecosystem out there in the reefs?
You're right, the better the ecosystem, the better you'll be, but the sandbed provides nothing in terms of an ecosystem that your liverock and other existing components don't already. So a sand bed would not be a better idea for that reason.
A deep sand bed is good for mainly a way of natural nitrate reduction. A short sand bed is mainly only good for looks. Sure it may house a few worms and cerith snails, but they can easily live without it.