Bubble Master Skimmers more info wanted???

Status
Not open for further replies.
For what its worth I thought I would post this. I've had the BM250 running on my tank for about a month now (no mods and just set at the lowest setting). The tank is a 120g. with a 40g. sump (yes the skimmer is oversized for this tank, but I'll comment more on that later) with a light bio-load. I just emptied some of the nastiest, smelliest stuff out of that skimmer. This stuff could have choked a goat just by smell only (sorry I didn't take pics, I'll try and remember next time). Now for the oversized skimmer question. After reading several posts I thought I really bought the wrong size BM for my tank. I thought it would work great but spend most of the time just bubbling with out producing anything. On the contrary I have noticed that it has produced everyday! Maybe it is oversized, but if it is able to produce on a constant basis then I see no problem with it and feel that overall it will work good on my system. Btw the skimmer was added when the tank was started so there was no build up of junk for it to remove. I forgot to mention that this was only 3-4 days worth of stuff and I was surprised at how much stuff had collected.
 
Hi lvpd, I am one that doesn't like to oversize and I've seen undersize and severly oversized not do as well as properly sized. One thing I was careful to never say is how a severly oversized skimmer would perform as it is different on every tank and different company skimmers behave differently as well. But I know that the BM250 won't be a problem with your 120g, but a BM200 would have been a better match. I've seen what the BM150, BM200 and BM250 does on my local dealer's 180g display tank that has a medium bioload. The BM200 kicks up consistently nastier stuff that either the BM150 or BM250. I also experience the same with H&S skimmers... I had a A200 (rated 300g) on my 175g light bioload tank and I downgraded to a A150 (rated 225g) and the consistent performance was so much better. JME

You know... if you ever plumb your 55g and 120g together, the BM250 will still handle the entire system perfectly. :D
<IMG SRC="http://usera.imagecave.com/winner/WorthlessThreadNOPics.gif">
 
Last edited:
Hi UCanDoIt - I know that was something that you have posted on several threads, but I didn't want to point any fingers so to speak :D. For the most part I agree with your reasoning and the BM200 would have been perfect. I think the original reason I got the BM250 was an unconscious desire to someday buy a bigger tank :lol: . I'm just so happy it's going to work awesome on my current system I wanted to spread the joy:rollface: .
 
:thumbsup: Post some photos when you get a chance.

I'm really interested in seeing the BM250 on tanks larger than 300g... can you imagine the crud? :D
 
I'll get some pics the next time I clean it out. I'm with you, where are the big tank guys when you need them...
 
Lvpd, my gallery has pics of the BM250...from a 310g total system. Would love to see pics of your BM and sump as well....

Still looking for pics as well of peoples tanks and bioloads...

Also, you can find numerous threads related to the BM....One started by our most loyalist non-user of the BM, friend of the BM250, as well as Greg from ReefGeek. Greg is a super nice guy to buy from as well as handle any issues you experience. Also a new thread on the BM250 is out there....

72HOURS:
110682mini-BM250_72HRS.jpg


On this Tank (much has changed):
110682mini-IMG_0791.jpg
 
lvpd, could you post some pics of your tank/sump/skimmer in action? Can't wait to see how yours compares other owners of the BM250. Thanks again for contributing to this thread :))
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9161081#post9161081 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by rpeeples
..... BM250... from a 310g total system.....
72HOURS:
110682mini-BM250_72HRS.jpg
The photo looks great and you got some nasty stuff here. Can't understand why you were implying that the BM250 wasn't a good skimmer??? :confused: :rolleye1:
 
at work(barrier reef aquariums), we have the bm250 on a system that has a 300g display tank with a 180g frag tank right behind it, it was just recently set up, so there are only a few coral frags in the system w/ live rock and live sand. despite the lack of a load it still produces nice skimmate every day. we have it set wet to collect beer colored skimmate right now. im sure that once we add a clean up crew and some fish it will darken up nicely. it does smell worse that the dark skimmate collected from our eheim euroreef skimmers though.
pics to come.
 
koraltek - over 500g total water volume! :thumbsup: can't wait until everything is up and running to see realistic big tank results. :)
 
UCanDoIt, DON"T GO THERE...... but you did!

****UcanDoIt, if you quantify a "good skimmer" by skimmate alone then I can see why you don't do your own water changes. Holy Cow!



It is obvious and apparent you do not read these threads unless what is written helps your marketing campaign for the ATI BM product line.

Again, I tried to evaluate this skimmer based on several factors and hoped that my previous post and write-ups on BM250 took these other factors into consideration.

Here is the write-up in case you forgot in can also be found on page 23 of this thread:

Sorry for the delay and as promised. Pics will follow.

I had the BM250 for about 8 weeks now. Below is my synopsis/summary of my experience with this skimmer. Please forgive any typos or grammatical errors, as I am an analyst by trade Æ'º

1. Order Shipment: Supply and Demand at its finest. I had to wait nearly 6-8 weeks from the time I placed the order until the time I received it. Perhaps this has changed.

2. I purchased mine from ReefGeek (Greg Morgan) nice guy to deal with.

3. Packed very well, I recall two large boxes with A LOT of peanuts.

4. Setup: instructions on how to setup up the pumps was not included nor any type of owners manual. I believe they come with one now. If not, your retailer can assist.

5. Skimmer Build: Looks like a Bubble King right? That it does but the materials used are of far lesser quality. This should be expected since a comparable BK would run you about a grand more. The welds and lines on the skimmer are clean. So the material I would rate as 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 and would rate the craftsmanship at 9.

6. Skimmer design: ATI obviously mimicked the BK Body and Bubble diffuser, which is probably why the bubble production and foam is incredible once you get the skimmer dialed. I will also conclude that dialing the skimmer in is one of the biggest complaints I have about the skimmer. The THREAD Wheel is another reason why bubbles/foam are produced in mass quantities. I am not a skimmer expert by any stretch of the imagination, however I do believe the THREAD Wheel is here to stay as you will begin to see widespread use of this $3.00 dollar modified engineered piece of hardware. I would even go as far to say that Bubble King would begin using this Thread Wheel in the near future.

7. Skimmer Adjustments: Absolutely by far the greatest shortcoming of this Skimmer's design and efficacy. I will summarize what I have found because I could spend all day writing on this topic alone.

-The skimmer will not perform if the H20 level it is running in is over 9" period, so if your water height is of this measurement, plan on building a platform for your skimmer to sit upon. My sump runs about 10". At first I used a 3-inch stand, then had to move to a 4.5" stand. The ultimate reason for this is the exit/exhaust of the skimmer is poorly designed. If you take a look at some of the BM threads here on RC you will see a lot of different setups ranging from 45 degree PVC elbows to the entire riser tube being removed from the exhaust outlet.

-In order to avoid this design flaw I had to retrofit a $750.00 skimmer. That¡¦s an oxymoron if you ask me. How can a skimmer that costs $750 need retrofitting? My point exactly. Anyways I built my own gatevalve for the skimmer of which I will post pics later this evening. This basically allows me to adjust the water level in the skimmer thus allowing me to adjust the type of skimmate production (Dry/Wet) I am shooting for.

If anyone tells you this skimmer can run in 8" of water or greater, and can produce a dry foam, and the skimmer will not overflow, I will give them mine.

8. Pumps: The Sicci or Sicca pumps (2 of them for the 250) are low wattage pumps which do not run hot and do not make any noise what-so-ever. That¡¦s the good point. The way the pumps attach to the skimmer body is debatable. The pumps attach to the skimmer body via a 2-inch rubber hose. The 1/2 the hose is placed into the pump output side while the other end is placed into the inlet of the skimmer. I would say this is rather a "cheap" way of reducing vibration and sound of the pumps/skimmer. However it does work but make sure you don't bump the pumps or you will lose your connection. Again, don't Bump the Pump

8.1. Venturi vents/hose tub rigging/silencer: One piece of "T" fitting PVC is drilled (2 holes) to allow the venture hoses to run into a clear acrylic tube silencer which is packed with polyester type wadding. Don¡¦t forget, this tube is also connected to the riser, which is meant to control water height in the skimmer. This design works fine if you don¡¦t have to move the riser tube but as stated earlier you will be moving this riser tube to adjust skimmate production types. I bypassed this completely by installing a separate external air inlet and gatevalve modification. Pictures will be provided this evening. In summary this setup (Venturi /hose tub rigging/silencer) is a poor design, which will require modification. Additionally, any modification done will require metric PVC or you will have to use US standard PVC and modify the dimensions with the use of a Dremmel or similar type of tool.

8.2. Air Intake and Pump Operation: I noticed when I would shut down my pumps to do various operations such as feeding, cleaning, modifications, etc and then re-start the pumps they would not turn on. One pump would sound like it was sucking air and/or the impeller was rattling. I tried wiggling the pumps, slightly nudging the pumps (be careful-¡§ Don¡¦t Bump the Pump¡¨) but it would still not start. One pump would return to full operation but the other pump would not. I called ReefGeek and they informed we the pump was not getting enough air and that I should blow in the air tube. I am not sure how convenient this would be if I was sitting at work and I had a power blip in which I temporarily lost power. You can draw your own conclusion on this observation. As an added point I had to purchase a $50.00 impeller assembly from ReefGeek in order to see if this might be an impeller problem. For a skimmer that is less than 8 weeks old and you paid $750.00 you can draw your own conclusion.


8.3. Pump Availability: Let¡¦s say the pump totally fried and needs replacement? Guess what, you will have to wait at least two more shipments (according to ReefGeek) in order to get a replacement pump. Notice a time frame is not given so it may take 10 days or 10 months before the 2nd shipment comes in. And in order to have one of these pumps delivered after the second shipment arrives it will cost $149.00/pump plus shipping. Again, you draw your own conclusions.

9.0 Skimmer Efficacy (does it perform): Yes it does! However not until after you have done the above modifications. As I stated previously the bubble and foam production is simply amazing once this skimmer gets dialed in but does it outweigh the modifications and finagling plus the $750.00 price tag, which does not include shipping or the gatevalve costs? Again, you can draw your own conclusions.

I know this is a very long reply but I wanted to give fellow reefers an honest insight into the performance of this skimmer. To many times you will see posts that are clearly biased and do not give you the upsides and downsides to a product, especially noticeable on the Bubble Master threads. I hope you found this to be an informational and hopefully objective opinion of this skimmer.

I will post numerous pictures of my experience later this evening and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions about this skimmer.

Thanks and may your corals grow and nitrates stay low.

Ron Peeples
 
Further comments regarding the BM250:

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9066597#post9066597 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by rpeeples
Thanks for the feedback Oliver. I am going to assume you are the creator of the ATI Skimmer or least employed by the company? I am not sure in your in Germany at the moment (must be about 2:30 AM on Thursday) but I do appreciate the time you spent preparing a response to my submission.

As I stated all along I can only share my experiences as an OWNER of the BM250 which I think is far more credible than witnessing testing periodically.

Given I have first hand knowledge of this skimmer I am the unique position to share subjective and objective facts based those experiences. As it is a new skimmer on the US market, the US consumers do not have the opportunity to learn from the German market nor do I have the ability to write/speak German and participate in similar"German" related forums :) So again I do appreciate the comments you provided.

As I stated in my synopsis I am not a skimmer expert/designer/fabricator of skimmers but rather an analyst who stares at a computer all day in a offubicle (Office/Cube). Yes I did go out on a limb on several occasions but as stated these comments were purely speculative and of personal opinion.

As you can see from the photos provided, my skimmer is operating at personally never before seen effectiveness and the efficiency is equally matched. However, this efficiency was obtained through the weekend home improvement warrior mentality which some would prefer to call OCD ;)

Now, back to your rebuttals. The comments regarding the mimicking of the Bubble King is really a compliment on my part. As I think the BM skimmers will compete with skimmers which are priced on the high end( no need to mention products) However you/ATI have managed to produce excellent results, after a few minor mods, which I believe of equal or better performance than other skimmers priced 50% to 100% higher.

However, as an end user of a product I need to evaluate not only the performance of a product but all the support and replacement parts. I wouldn't purchase a Porsche if I could get replacement parts including an engine, would you? So yes, having a replacement pump is essential to me and others who would like to continue using the ATI Bubble Master Skimmers. And as both you and ReefGeek have stated, replacement pumps are NOT available now but will be in the future and this was a decision ATI made perhaps to avoid other trying to steal the design but this is only a guess. But as a end user I can assure you I do not care to know the inner workings of a Sicci pump. I just want them to work and when they don't I need the ability to replace a pump.

The modifications made are roughly $20 to $30 US dollars and anyone who has used a riser tube compared to a gatevalve will unequivocally vow it is a better and more precise way to adjust a skimmer. I certainly don't claim to have invented the gatevalve but rather employ it on the ATI skimmer.

Lastly, I appreciate the opportunity to share my experience with others on reef central as so many have done for me. As an OWNER of the BM250 and a passion for skimmers I felt it was my obligation to share both a subjective and objective review of the skimmer that I personally purchased and observed in use for over 500 hours unlike others on this thread.

Again, thank you for taking time provide insight into the design, function, and future support of the skimmer. I hope you will continue to monitor the thread a provide feedback as you deem fit. I wish ATI much success in the US, furthermore I believe the feedback you review on this thread will assist you and your company in achieving this success. Stay in touch.

Respectfully Submitted,

Ron Peeples

I haven't updated the picture of the Venturi hoses however mine are currently submersed no greater than 2 - 3 inches in the water then extended out.



As my sub
 
UCanDoIt: Pay close attention to bullet point number 9.0


<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9165320#post9165320 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by rpeeples
UCanDoIt, DON"T GO THERE...... but you did!

****UcanDoIt, if you quantify a "good skimmer" by skimmate alone then I can see why you don't do your own water changes. Holy Cow!



It is obvious and apparent you do not read these threads unless what is written helps your marketing campaign for the ATI BM product line.

Again, I tried to evaluate this skimmer based on several factors and hoped that my previous post and write-ups on BM250 took these other factors into consideration.

Here is the write-up in case you forgot in can also be found on page 23 of this thread:

Sorry for the delay and as promised. Pics will follow.

I had the BM250 for about 8 weeks now. Below is my synopsis/summary of my experience with this skimmer. Please forgive any typos or grammatical errors, as I am an analyst by trade Æ'º

1. Order Shipment: Supply and Demand at its finest. I had to wait nearly 6-8 weeks from the time I placed the order until the time I received it. Perhaps this has changed.

2. I purchased mine from ReefGeek (Greg Morgan) nice guy to deal with.

3. Packed very well, I recall two large boxes with A LOT of peanuts.

4. Setup: instructions on how to setup up the pumps was not included nor any type of owners manual. I believe they come with one now. If not, your retailer can assist.

5. Skimmer Build: Looks like a Bubble King right? That it does but the materials used are of far lesser quality. This should be expected since a comparable BK would run you about a grand more. The welds and lines on the skimmer are clean. So the material I would rate as 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 and would rate the craftsmanship at 9.

6. Skimmer design: ATI obviously mimicked the BK Body and Bubble diffuser, which is probably why the bubble production and foam is incredible once you get the skimmer dialed. I will also conclude that dialing the skimmer in is one of the biggest complaints I have about the skimmer. The THREAD Wheel is another reason why bubbles/foam are produced in mass quantities. I am not a skimmer expert by any stretch of the imagination, however I do believe the THREAD Wheel is here to stay as you will begin to see widespread use of this $3.00 dollar modified engineered piece of hardware. I would even go as far to say that Bubble King would begin using this Thread Wheel in the near future.

7. Skimmer Adjustments: Absolutely by far the greatest shortcoming of this Skimmer's design and efficacy. I will summarize what I have found because I could spend all day writing on this topic alone.

-The skimmer will not perform if the H20 level it is running in is over 9" period, so if your water height is of this measurement, plan on building a platform for your skimmer to sit upon. My sump runs about 10". At first I used a 3-inch stand, then had to move to a 4.5" stand. The ultimate reason for this is the exit/exhaust of the skimmer is poorly designed. If you take a look at some of the BM threads here on RC you will see a lot of different setups ranging from 45 degree PVC elbows to the entire riser tube being removed from the exhaust outlet.

-In order to avoid this design flaw I had to retrofit a $750.00 skimmer. That¡¦s an oxymoron if you ask me. How can a skimmer that costs $750 need retrofitting? My point exactly. Anyways I built my own gatevalve for the skimmer of which I will post pics later this evening. This basically allows me to adjust the water level in the skimmer thus allowing me to adjust the type of skimmate production (Dry/Wet) I am shooting for.

If anyone tells you this skimmer can run in 8" of water or greater, and can produce a dry foam, and the skimmer will not overflow, I will give them mine.

8. Pumps: The Sicci or Sicca pumps (2 of them for the 250) are low wattage pumps which do not run hot and do not make any noise what-so-ever. That¡¦s the good point. The way the pumps attach to the skimmer body is debatable. The pumps attach to the skimmer body via a 2-inch rubber hose. The 1/2 the hose is placed into the pump output side while the other end is placed into the inlet of the skimmer. I would say this is rather a "cheap" way of reducing vibration and sound of the pumps/skimmer. However it does work but make sure you don't bump the pumps or you will lose your connection. Again, don't Bump the Pump

8.1. Venturi vents/hose tub rigging/silencer: One piece of "T" fitting PVC is drilled (2 holes) to allow the venture hoses to run into a clear acrylic tube silencer which is packed with polyester type wadding. Don¡¦t forget, this tube is also connected to the riser, which is meant to control water height in the skimmer. This design works fine if you don¡¦t have to move the riser tube but as stated earlier you will be moving this riser tube to adjust skimmate production types. I bypassed this completely by installing a separate external air inlet and gatevalve modification. Pictures will be provided this evening. In summary this setup (Venturi /hose tub rigging/silencer) is a poor design, which will require modification. Additionally, any modification done will require metric PVC or you will have to use US standard PVC and modify the dimensions with the use of a Dremmel or similar type of tool.

8.2. Air Intake and Pump Operation: I noticed when I would shut down my pumps to do various operations such as feeding, cleaning, modifications, etc and then re-start the pumps they would not turn on. One pump would sound like it was sucking air and/or the impeller was rattling. I tried wiggling the pumps, slightly nudging the pumps (be careful-¡§ Don¡¦t Bump the Pump¡¨) but it would still not start. One pump would return to full operation but the other pump would not. I called ReefGeek and they informed we the pump was not getting enough air and that I should blow in the air tube. I am not sure how convenient this would be if I was sitting at work and I had a power blip in which I temporarily lost power. You can draw your own conclusion on this observation. As an added point I had to purchase a $50.00 impeller assembly from ReefGeek in order to see if this might be an impeller problem. For a skimmer that is less than 8 weeks old and you paid $750.00 you can draw your own conclusion.


8.3. Pump Availability: Let¡¦s say the pump totally fried and needs replacement? Guess what, you will have to wait at least two more shipments (according to ReefGeek) in order to get a replacement pump. Notice a time frame is not given so it may take 10 days or 10 months before the 2nd shipment comes in. And in order to have one of these pumps delivered after the second shipment arrives it will cost $149.00/pump plus shipping. Again, you draw your own conclusions.

9.0 Skimmer Efficacy (does it perform): Yes it does! However not until after you have done the above modifications. As I stated previously the bubble and foam production is simply amazing once this skimmer gets dialed in but does it outweigh the modifications and finagling plus the $750.00 price tag, which does not include shipping or the gatevalve costs? Again, you can draw your own conclusions.

I know this is a very long reply but I wanted to give fellow reefers an honest insight into the performance of this skimmer. To many times you will see posts that are clearly biased and do not give you the upsides and downsides to a product, especially noticeable on the Bubble Master threads. I hope you found this to be an informational and hopefully objective opinion of this skimmer.

I will post numerous pictures of my experience later this evening and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions about this skimmer.

Thanks and may your corals grow and nitrates stay low.

Ron Peeples
 
I have heard from EX owners of this skimmer that this skimmer is not all that great. That its not a set it and forget it skimmer like others out there. I have also heard that theres too much tuning and other mods you have to do to this skimmer to make it run well. Just what I have heard.
 
9.0 Skimmer Efficacy (does it perform): Yes it does! However not until after you have done the above modifications. As I stated previously the bubble and foam production is simply amazing once this skimmer gets dialed in but does it outweigh the modifications and finagling plus the $750.00 price tag, which does not include shipping or the gatevalve costs? Again, you can draw your own conclusions.

I guess I would take a little issue with point 9. I have not done any modifications to my skimmer and it is performing great. So far it has been "plug & play," and better then any other skimmer I have owned. Also I would quantify a "good skimmer" by how it performs and one of the ways to determine performance is by skimmate. In saying that I'm not sure I get your point. One of the early complaints (if you want to call it that) about this skimmer was the material, ie they used thinner acrylic then some of the other skimmers used in comparison. People said some of the other skimmers are built like a tank. Great, if I ever go to war I'll take a skimmer with me (lol). I don't see why skimmers have to be over-built. Sure its nice when it feels solid, but I think my BM feels solid enough, I'm not worried about it breaking when I handle it. Its not like it needs to be "built like a tank" just to sit in a sump and make bubbles. Also this skimmer costs less then every other skimmer it was tested against and it either performed just as well or better then the more expensive skimmers. I'm not even going to get in to pump efficiency or ability to draw air (but they would add to the quantification of a "good skimmer") BTW I will try and take some pics of my sump tonight and post them.
 
I'd like to weight in on this a bit.

IMHO, the thing to focus in on is that the BM250 pulls in 32 to 40 lpm of air. If you look at other skimmers that perform that well they cost significantly more than $750.

I am a big fan of EuroReef skimmers because they make a quality product and the factory is about 30 miles from my house. However, when I priced out a comparable ER skimmer it consumed more than twice the power (50W vs 120W) and cost more than twice as much ($1669 vs $750) and took up a lot more space in my sump.

I also thought about building my own skimmer and just the raw materials (pumps, acrylic sheets, tubes,etc) would have run me around $400 + the time to build and test it.

I think that if ATI had used a wedge pipe on this skimmer and mounted the pumps in a better way a lot of the complaints would be non issues.

--Rick
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9165521#post9165521 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by fishsoldseprtly
I have heard from EX owners of this skimmer that this skimmer is not all that great. That its not a set it and forget it skimmer like others out there. I have also heard that theres too much tuning and other mods you have to do to this skimmer to make it run well. Just what I have heard.

Not true, The only thing i have to do is empty cup once every week, and rinse out angelhair in the silencer.
If thats too much then alot of other skimmers fall in that catergory.
 
I have not done any mods to mine, Its stock, and i get great performance. People get worried after 2-3 days and start fiddling. If they wait they will see it will take over. The gate valve mod is nice though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top