Well folks - I knew I shouldn't start commenting on the RKE vs. AC-III

It was obvious I was only going to get myself in trouble. Seriously - I tried to make clear that I was just expressing a personal opinion. To be fair, I'll try to explain my points - but this will be the last comment I have

.
1. Wireless communication without the need for game adapters, etc. I have no idea what this is going to cost. Its usefulness will depend on that.
2. RKE upgrades are done via USB. Technology not yet available with the AC-III. It doesn't know what USB is.
3. I guess we agree.
4. I need 8 outlets just for my skimmers and ozone. So the importance depends on your needs.
5. Try the menu on the AC-III - shades of the Commodore 64 (showing my age, here

).
6. How many, would depend on the size of the program you've written. The more complex the program, the greater the size and the less options you have. Again, shades of the Commodore 64.
7. You might have me here - I'm not sure.

My gut tells me if it'll handle 32 probes, well ...
8. I'm currently working on a program, external to the AC-III that will allow me to control feeding sequences which turn various devices on and off. The exact devices affected depends on which pumps are currently running and what parameters are currently reported. DA indicated to me (months ago, I admit) that this kind of logic will be doable via their implementation of stackable timers.
As to price. Most vendors sell the AC-III Pro with pH, ORP, and Temp capabilities, an 8 outlet device controller, a pH probe, and a temp probe for $700. This includes the email/network/telnet capabilities. The same from DA costs $610. An additional point here would be a comparison of similar accessory modules. The Neptune products are always more expensive.
So, that all said - I have an AC-III Pro. I am absolutely sure I will (with a little tweaking here and there) get it to do everything I need. It is a great product! It just wouldn't have been my choice had DA done more thorough beta testing.