can you help me go skimmerless?

Thank you for taking the time to respond. I think you would agree that six months is far too short a time to claim success for ANY method of tank maintenance. While there is certainly nothing wrong with your tank, I personally am striving for something of higher quality (no offense meant). My own goal is to strive for a TOTM quality tank and I have yet to see a tank of that quality and longevity without a protein skimmer. I am certainly open to the idea that it is possible I just haven't seen an example yet. Again, thanks for taking the time to post a picture of your tank. Would anyone else running an ATS sans protein skimmer post pics of your tank please? I am especially interested in tanks doing it for at least a reasonable length of time (at minimum a year and preferably longer).

After running an ATS for about 18+ months I have decided to run a skimmer on my upcoming 150g build. I was just not seeing the TOTM results I was looking for. The ATS is extremely effective as lowering p04 and nitrates, I consistantly test unmeasurable on both (Salifert). I also ran several months without water changes, no problem. Feed a ton, no algae in the display tank.

However, something is missing. I was just not seeing the same growth out of my SPS as I wished. Users with skimmers posting growth pics for a period of a few months were showing more growth than I was in six.

I am by no means any sort of professional but have decided to go a different route in my future tank, who knows I may just switch back.
 
After running an ATS for about 18+ months I have decided to run a skimmer on my upcoming 150g build. I was just not seeing the TOTM results I was looking for. The ATS is extremely effective as lowering p04 and nitrates, I consistantly test unmeasurable on both (Salifert). I also ran several months without water changes, no problem. Feed a ton, no algae in the display tank.

However, something is missing. I was just not seeing the same growth out of my SPS as I wished. Users with skimmers posting growth pics for a period of a few months were showing more growth than I was in six.

I am by no means any sort of professional but have decided to go a different route in my future tank, who knows I may just switch back.

I would bet that while the turf algae uptakes a lot of phosphate and nitrate it does not remove everything the skimmer does (which some would see as a benefit). A skimmer removes other chemical species besides nitrate and phosphate that naturally accumulate in aquaria over time while the turf algae do not. That is the main reason why I think ATS are a great tool in water quality maintenance but are not a "cure-all" solution. Just one of the many ways to treat water. An ideal water quality solution would include mechanical, chemical, and biological filtration. Each are beneficial and are not mutually exclusive.
 
Zangmann, Could you please describe you ATS setup?

2x needlepoint sheets from the craft store (10"x13" i think?)
4x 42w CFL changed every 3-4 months. Always wanted to do a LED setup, still may :)

Lights are on 18 hours and off 6.
55 gallon tank, 1" drain into sump. QuietOne 3000 (780gph) for the return.

Like I said everything is working fine, tons of pods everywhere. Red turf grows EVERYWHERE in my sump, have to clean it constantly.

Just not getting the SPS growth I'm looking for. Chemistry is stable.
 
I would bet that while the turf algae uptakes a lot of phosphate and nitrate it does not remove everything the skimmer does (which some would see as a benefit). A skimmer removes other chemical species besides nitrate and phosphate that naturally accumulate in aquaria over time while the turf algae do not. That is the main reason why I think ATS are a great tool in water quality maintenance but are not a "cure-all" solution. Just one of the many ways to treat water. An ideal water quality solution would include mechanical, chemical, and biological filtration. Each are beneficial and are not mutually exclusive.

I agree, if my skimmer can't keep up I may plumb a T for an ATS.
 
2x needlepoint sheets from the craft store (10"x13" i think?)
4x 42w CFL changed every 3-4 months. Always wanted to do a LED setup, still may :)

Lights are on 18 hours and off 6.
55 gallon tank, 1" drain into sump. QuietOne 3000 (780gph) for the return.

Like I said everything is working fine, tons of pods everywhere. Red turf grows EVERYWHERE in my sump, have to clean it constantly.

Just not getting the SPS growth I'm looking for. Chemistry is stable.

A 10x13 screen means your screen is rated for a 130 gallon tank! Thats almost 2.5 times the size you need. I would say one of the reason your SPS may be growing slowly is that your need to heavily feed your corals.
 
A 10x13 screen means your screen is rated for a 130 gallon tank! Thats almost 2.5 times the size you need. I would say one of the reason your SPS may be growing slowly is that your need to heavily feed your corals.

I was feeding once a day with 6 fish in a 55 gallon.
My 2.5" yellow tang pooping everywhere! Pretty sure the corals were fed, could be something to look at though.
 
I mean more a long the lines of coral food, not fish food

Poop is coral food! I'm not really trying to argue here, just saying the ATS in MY situation was not working. The fish are happy, the tank is healthy. I just don't think that an ATS has the potential to be the lone source of filtration in a predominately SPS system.
 
Poop is coral food! I'm not really trying to argue here, just saying the ATS in MY situation was not working. The fish are happy, the tank is healthy. I just don't think that an ATS has the potential to be the lone source of filtration in a predominately SPS system.

Sorry if you thought I was arguing, I meant no harm. Just was a suggestion. Talking through text has no inflection, this is my fault and sometimes I should compensate for that. Take a look at SantaMonica's take can show that it can be done. However you are entitled to your own opinion, and if you feel that it doesn't work for you then by all means, do what works for you.
 
I think if you are going for tank of the month and want to go skimmerless-nano would be the way to go. Generally for a off the hook TOTM or crazy sps tank you need a good skimmer. That relagates the ATS to the same purpose a cheato-and its not worth the work. However if someone wants a nice tank- it can be done with ATS-or with cheato-or a skimmer- or any combination of these things and others. I personally don`t have tanks like i used to when I had the TOTM mentality. I am more into the natural look- and having growth be self limiting to the situation. I am tired of fragging and moving stuff- I am happy to just have a chunk of reef to look at and not care. I do think its bad form to harsh on anybodys tank though-and I thought it was really big of the picture poster not to take offnse.
 
So it seems that most here are either or on which way to go.

Does anyone run both?

I currently run both.

After using both I've come to the conclusion that I'd never run a reef tank without a scrubber. But I would run a reef without a skimmer. I could only have one, I'd pick the scrubber, no contest.

Don't get my wrong, I'm not part of the "anti-skimmer" crowd. I use a skimmer. I've been running some form of protein skimmer for over 2 decades. I had one back in 1985 when all they were was a wooden airstone and a poorly designed venturi. I just won't rely on ONLY the skimmer anymore. I'll always have a simple turf scrubber on any reef that I have.
 
Sorry if you thought I was arguing, I meant no harm. Just was a suggestion. Talking through text has no inflection, this is my fault and sometimes I should compensate for that. Take a look at SantaMonica's take can show that it can be done. However you are entitled to your own opinion, and if you feel that it doesn't work for you then by all means, do what works for you.

I didn't, you're fine. SM does have a nice tank. However, I haven't seen any recent pictures of his tank, the ones I've seen are a few years old. Haven't seen any growth comparison pictures. This is what I'm most interested in.

He says:
The main thing to mention is that this tank is not for showing... it is for experimenting.

Maybe if someone set up an ATS tank with the intention of creating a TOTM and was successful, it would give the ATS crowd a huge boost. I have yet to see these results in my own tank. Not saying it not possible, just that I haven't seen results.

I have no problem maintaining my tank and corals, want I want is great GROWTH. Unfortunately I don't think an ATS only system can give me that.
 
I think inland aquatics has some display tanks that could be TOTM- see if you can find pics. You need to remember, even though this is a big site- it comprises a very small % of the reef keeping population. The whole point to them using the system is growth- and they do it very well. As I said- I am not a advocate of ATS- I used to argue with the inventor about it frequently-but it can work.
 
I just realized that I never posted my last harvest! First time measuring, came out to ONE CUP!

a68989a9-331a-1273.jpg


It would have been much more but it was very hard to collect the harvest into a measuring cup.
 
I currently run both.

After using both I've come to the conclusion that I'd never run a reef tank without a scrubber. But I would run a reef without a skimmer. I could only have one, I'd pick the scrubber, no contest.

Don't get my wrong, I'm not part of the "anti-skimmer" crowd. I use a skimmer. I've been running some form of protein skimmer for over 2 decades. I had one back in 1985 when all they were was a wooden airstone and a poorly designed venturi. I just won't rely on ONLY the skimmer anymore. I'll always have a simple turf scrubber on any reef that I have.

What size scrubber do you use to compensate for already having a skimmer?
 
ATS Fan

ATS Fan

I want to show my support for ATS's. When I set this 75 back up 4 years ago I battled with my EUROREEF skimmer for 7-8 months. Every couple of weeks it would go into overflow mode for a couple days and flow teh skimmate back into the tank. Things looked horrible every time it would overflow. Just got sick of dealing with it. I unplugged it and let the tank go. Three months with no attention. Almost tore it down. 90 days later when I scrubbed the front glass I was surprised to find that things had gotten better since turning off the skimmer. So i left it like that for about a year and a half. But hair and bubble algae had a serious foothold. I couldnt feed much. Then I read the articles on ATS's and eventually decided to try one. So I built a bucket scrubber and haven't looked back.

Is it tank of the month material? No. But my maintenance time is a lot less than those guys also. I still have great growth on corals and most important I enjoy the hobby again.

My only source of cal/alk is kalk in the top-off water and I run a bag of chemipure hanging in the sump. I have not changed any water since June of 2010(30 gal). (I had a hot day prior to hooking my chiller up and things got a little soupy, stupid gamble and I lost a few corals).

I have been running ats since Nov/Dec 2009. Anemones, tubeworms of all types(cocoworms), photosynth gorgs and LPS as well as green slimer and birdnest, pocillipora have all grown very well. These fotos are about 4 months ago. Will try to get some newer ones if you guys want. The slimer in teh upper left is much bigger now.

2010_0318ReefTank0243.jpg


2010_0318ReefTank0240-1.jpg
 
:o Your eating a lot of humble pie!! Your tank looks fanastic! :eek2:

Thank you for posting, this should help others have some confidence with long term success using an Algae Turf Srcubber. Please share your setup with us all. I understand your just running a bucket scrubber, but a picture is worth a thousand words, right?

Some more pictures of your tank couldn't hurt!... :beer:
 
Those bubble tip nems are sweet..........if people find out they keep their bubbles in ATS systems, this type of filtration will explode in popularity.
 
Back
Top