Corals that are photosynthetic don't have their own pigmentation, their tissue is clear. If they had pigmentation they would block light from reaching their sybiotes. This is why corals are white when they bleach; they expell their zooxanthellae leaving the skeleton exposed.
Funny, one type-o and your whole argument goes out the window.... You don't have to look very far to verify what I was saying, especially with regards to the types of chlorophyll and various pigmentation.
I am not so interested in what Dana has to say but in the published works she cites. I have access to the Uni's database so ill check out some of those sources and see what else I can find.
:lolspin:
First of all, I am not questioning the role of the photochemical perdinin in the role of photosynthesis and the research paper you referenced on the discovery of a new form of peridinin in Symbodinium spp. dinoflagellates was fascinating. But as that is the only reference you have posted to support your claim that corals "don't have their own pigmentation" tells me you have a great deal to learn.
For starters the photopigments perdinin, and also beta carotine (diadinoxanthin), have nothing to do with the production of fluorescing and chromo proteins in corals. (1) And probably the most parsimonious hypothesis for the production of these proteins is in fact for photoprotection, to shade the corals symbionts. (2)(3) Additionally, while a bleached coral might appear white to our eyes under white light it may still have fluorescence when stimulated with blue light (3) (see fig. 1 here: http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130312/srep01421/fig_tab/srep01421_F1.html )
(1) http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2006/9/aafeature Par. 5
(2) http://cel.webofknowledge.com/Inbou...th=Highwire&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord
(3) http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130312/srep01421/full/srep01421.html