gofor100
New member
Username: it's awesome that you stuck in there with the angel and re-evaluated how/what you were feeding instead of just taking the fish out. I think it definitely sheds some light on the fact that the "reef-safeness" of an angel might depend more on the caretaker (you and me) than it does the fish itself, irregardless of what is inside the tank with it (i.e., clams, types of corals, or competing herbivores).
If more people have stories like yours, it might tend to prove that a varied and frequent diet might make these fish 100% reef-safe (or at least no longer considered a reef-safe "with caution" fish). Don't get me wrong, there are always exceptions to the rule (i.e., TNTFISHY's situation, he/she's had the fish for 2 to 3 years and only feeds the tank 2 or 3 times PER WEEK without any irreparable "picking" of corals/clams). But much like Tangs that pick at corals/clams because there is not enough algae in the tank or in their diet, maybe we can start looking at some angels the same way. The new rule could be "If fed one to two times per day, with a consistent supplement of nori or some other vegetation, the dwarf/pygmy angel is considered safe with all SPS, LPS, and clams." Somone call Scott W. Michael to see if he might consider updating his books
(kidding of course).
Further, there certainly are types of dwarf/pygmy/"regular" angels out there that have more of an appetite or higher/different nutritional needs than others, requiring more frequent/varied feedings than others. That might explain why some of the "larger" angels (who have a diet consisting more of sponge than dwarf/pygmy angels that eat mainly algae) are a greater risk to picking. However, I would venture to say that those aquarists that keep the "larger" angels successfully in reef tanks, either have them in relatively large aquariums with plenty of LR to pick on (or if they do pick on corals, they are not picking on just one and thus not causing irreparable damage), or feed them frequently and with enough variation that they have little to no interest in corals/clams.
Interesting stuff guys... keep it coming!
If more people have stories like yours, it might tend to prove that a varied and frequent diet might make these fish 100% reef-safe (or at least no longer considered a reef-safe "with caution" fish). Don't get me wrong, there are always exceptions to the rule (i.e., TNTFISHY's situation, he/she's had the fish for 2 to 3 years and only feeds the tank 2 or 3 times PER WEEK without any irreparable "picking" of corals/clams). But much like Tangs that pick at corals/clams because there is not enough algae in the tank or in their diet, maybe we can start looking at some angels the same way. The new rule could be "If fed one to two times per day, with a consistent supplement of nori or some other vegetation, the dwarf/pygmy angel is considered safe with all SPS, LPS, and clams." Somone call Scott W. Michael to see if he might consider updating his books
Further, there certainly are types of dwarf/pygmy/"regular" angels out there that have more of an appetite or higher/different nutritional needs than others, requiring more frequent/varied feedings than others. That might explain why some of the "larger" angels (who have a diet consisting more of sponge than dwarf/pygmy angels that eat mainly algae) are a greater risk to picking. However, I would venture to say that those aquarists that keep the "larger" angels successfully in reef tanks, either have them in relatively large aquariums with plenty of LR to pick on (or if they do pick on corals, they are not picking on just one and thus not causing irreparable damage), or feed them frequently and with enough variation that they have little to no interest in corals/clams.
Interesting stuff guys... keep it coming!