TheH
New member
Little bit of a stretch for you to assume that the venom glands discovered are vestigial, TampaReefer79. While there is a chance that the research is incorrect, I would defer to professionally conducted investigations by scientists to your "personal beliefs", as street-smart as you may be 
Additionally, when a chemical substance is produced by an organism for the purpose of provoking an allergic reaction, who is to say that the substance is not venomous? For example, a bee sting is typically only serious when it evokes an allergic response in humans - but we still consider the chemical to be a venom.
Additionally, when a chemical substance is produced by an organism for the purpose of provoking an allergic reaction, who is to say that the substance is not venomous? For example, a bee sting is typically only serious when it evokes an allergic response in humans - but we still consider the chemical to be a venom.