<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6624928#post6624928 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by barryhc
You are not catching "the jist" of the "wasting" approach. Neither the "Flow over" water from the "Standard applicaton" of RDSB, nor the "Flow thru" water, from the "wasting" version is going to be "devoid" of Nitrates.
The Flow "Over" version will cause Nitrates to become lowered over time. However, the difference between incoming water and outgoing water is assuredly undetectable! ! ! Over time, the Nitrate level will reduce. This is likely to take 2 to 6 months to develop.
The Flow "Thru" version, MIGHT actually reduce the level of Nitrate to zero ( in the effluent itself ), but, it is likely to have elevated levels of phosphate, and many of the constituents that lead to Hydrogen Sulfide production, as well as a "goodly" amount of heavy metals. The amount of flow in a flow thru version is really not enough to significantly affect nitrate levels in the water column anyway, unless an unreasonably huge " bed" is used, or if "feeding" is utilized, which would raise the levels of other "nasty" effluents.