<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9679466#post9679466 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Reefugee
There's been numerous holy wars on RC regarding RODI system. Some people swear that the cheapie Ebay RODI system works great, while others tell you that if you don't spend $200+ on an RODI, you have a piece of junk and your fish will all grow a third eye from the contaminated water.
Anyway - I have a an Ebay (AquaSafe) RODI system rated at 100GPD. According to what I have read, the 100GPD RO membrane has a rejection rate to 90%. The 75GPD unit has a rejection rate of 98%. I have been debating on converting my 100GPD RO to a 75GPD RO.
I also heard that the initial burst of RODI water is usually not that great, so it's bad to run RODI for a short period of time. It is supposed to be better to run the RODI for a less frequent but longer period of time. I decided to do some quick tests.
My RODI unit is about 2 years old. All the pre-filters and the RO membrane are originals. I have replaced only the DI five times in the past two years - usually when the RODI water reads 15+ppm. I just replaced my DI with the Funman1's DI group buy (Thanks Steve!). Below are my TDS reading from my test.
Tap water = 515 ppm (my water seems to vary between 500 to 900ppm)
RO = initially 144 ppm but after a few minutes, it read 6ppm
after DI = 0ppm
water production rate: no where close to 100GPD
So according to my calculation, my RO is removing 98.8% of the TDS. Also - it appears to confirm that running the RODI for frequent short burst is worse than running it for less frequent longer period of time.
Here is the interesting part - my RODI water has read as high as 17ppm before. I can't recall if I tested the water at the "initial burst" or after the water had been running for a while. If it was after the water had been running for a while, I am wondering if the DI could have leached some impurities back into the water.
Anyway - I just though I would share my results with the group.
Now - let the religious war start....
Minh