Effluent with Phosphate reading 2.0

Well, if people are dripping the effluent through media, that indicates the definite likeliness of PO4 coming out of their reactors.

Rick, have you ever tested your reactor's effluent for PO4?
 
melev said:
<b>dgasmd</b>, I would actually like to test it as you suggested. So I'll give that a try. However, to get an accurate test, do you still test dripping effluent or do you leave it open to get decent flow through the media? Maybe I'll take the entire reactor apart and clean it with vinegar, to remove any traces of PO4.

Marc:

Test it the same way you use it, whether it is dripping or a steady stream. I seriously doubt your PO4 were so high as to impregnate into the reactor's media. It is likely to have been high all along. You just did not know because you never tested it before.

I am glad to see you found Kevin. If you don't mind it, please forward me his email to contact him to make me a another.

In the little experiment of the effluents, I would test the following way to eliminate all variables:

1. test tank water
2. test reactor's effluent as it is now without touching the reactor
3. turn off CO2 and test the effluent again when pH has reached the same as the tank.
4. clean the reactor and replace media.
5. test effluent of reactor without CO2 running with new media
6. turn on CO2 and reach you optimum working pH. Test again the effluent.
7 test the tank's water again.

That should give you a picture of the tank and effuent before and after any variable.

Alberto
PS: did you get my email or PM?
 
dgasmd said:
Marc:

Test it the same way you use it, whether it is dripping or a steady stream. I seriously doubt your PO4 were so high as to impregnate into the reactor's media. It is likely to have been high all along. You just did not know because you never tested it before.

I am glad to see you found Kevin. If you don't mind it, please forward me his email to contact him to make me a another.

In the little experiment of the effluents, I would test the following way to eliminate all variables:

1. test tank water
2. test reactor's effluent as it is now without touching the reactor
3. turn off CO2 and test the effluent again when pH has reached the same as the tank.
4. clean the reactor and replace media.
5. test effluent of reactor without CO2 running with new media
6. turn on CO2 and reach you optimum working pH. Test again the effluent.
7 test the tank's water again.

That should give you a picture of the tank and effuent before and after any variable.


Man, nothing like a little homework, eh?

For #3 and #5, are we talking about the little bit that drips out, or do I want to open the valve to get a steady flow going through the reactor? The wait period could be substantial as the pH rises and drops ever so slowly.

I have his username on Marshreef in my PM box. I'll look it up and give it to you, as he didn't give me an email address.
 
Just let it drip on the cup and raw from the cup. For #3 and #4 you could do it either way. Certainly opening the valve will flush the CO2 present in the reactor faster, but it may be a little too much CO2 dumped at once. I seriously doubt it will do anything, but watch your tank's pH just in case.

Alberto
PS: Did you get my PM or email?
 
melev said:

Rick, have you ever tested your reactor's effluent for PO4?

I tested the effluent coming out of the calcium reactor today, twice, with a brand new phosphate test kit. Both times the reading was zero, or as close to the zero color as I could tell. That is with A.R.M. and the reactor is very low, so it is media that has been in there for a couple of months.
 
Can you tell me how to raise the alkalinity of the effluent? Do I need to decrease the pH more? I asked this earlier and never got a reply.

PO4 today was still around .25 in the tank, and 0 in the effluent cup.
 
You might be fixing the symptom rather than the root cause but at least you're on the right track with zero readings in teh effluent. :)
 
Oh, no doubt. I'm going to replace the media. I'm just testing what is occuring in the tank now.
 
Re: Effluent with Phosphate reading 2.0

melev said:
Tank: .5 (nice drop for 24 hours)
Effluent: 2.0 (assuming the test is accurate with higher alk and lower pH)

What are the units ?

0.5 ppm in tank and 2 ppm in effluent.

Is this true ?
 
Melev:

The only problem with lowering the pH below 6.7-6.8 with ARM is that tons of it will turn into dust and clog the living heck out of your reactor's pads/filters. That is the very same reason a lot of people are trying the Schuran media because the lower the pH the lhigher the DKH. Running the pH at 6.2-6.1 with that media can give you DKH values in the 90's on the effluent without much dust formation. It may be too much CO2 to add into your system depending on your effluent rate and the efficiency of you Ca reactor.
 
I could try to go to pH 6.5, something I've never tried before. <b>Bojan</b> - your DIY looks excellent. Nice job! And yes, in my last post, I was referring to ppm (Salifert test). Sorry, I got a little lazy and didn't include the units of measurement.
 
i have started using Schuran "knock off" media (sold at premiumaquatics.com) they said it looks teh same as the schuran stuff and might be from the same company. i use it due to the dust issue that dgasmd was talking about w/ arm...i hated it. and for the lower po4 values....not proven but suposed to be lower in po4

Lunchbucket
 
tested my tank and effluent for alk and phosphates today here are my numbers:

tank:
alk - 11dKH (salifert)
po4 - 0.0ppm (salifert)

effluent
alk - ~34.0dKH (salifert)
po4 - <0.03ppm (salifert)

i'm glad to see that the po4 is low out of the effluent and undetectable w/ the salifert in the tank. i do realize that my po4 test might be sqewed due to the high alk when i tested it though

melev i'm sure the media has sucked up some po4 and possibly the other stuff in the reactor. hope that it gets all figured out soon!!

BTW - love in the first shot your ER skimmer :D

Lunchbucket
 
The reactor is circulating water and a little muriatic acid (1 cup worth), so it and its pump will be nice and clean. I need to clean the tubing as well, next. The ARM arrived yesterday, so I'll refill the reactor in a little bit.

I was talking with Rickjb today and he mentioned that the way I control the effluent may be part of the reason the alkalinity is so low. Since water is added to the reactor very slowly, and drips out into the beer cup, the pH rises and drops much slower within the reactor itself. He thinks measuring it within the reactor will turn the Co2 on and off more quickly. I would have to buy some type of probe holder and mount it to the reactor's lid to change the way it is running now.
 
melev - i was wondering why you didn't test the pH in the reactor. i have an extra probe holder if you want it

Lunchbucket
 
There is no way to test it within the reactor without turning it off and opening it up. I measure the effluent, which should be what the pH is inside the reactor.
 
Melev

What you measure coming out is what is inside.

That little reactor that we were talking about I ordered. Here is what I'm going to do.

I will buy a cheap PH controller and place the probe where the probe holder is inside that mini reactor. I will have it turn on and off the Soleniod on my regulaterto control my PH inside.

I learned with my last setup the best way to control PH is to just mess with the Bubble count. It becomes very difficult if you change the effuent rate and bubble count at once.


melev said:
I was talking with Rickjb today and he mentioned that the way I control the effluent may be part of the reason the alkalinity is so low. Since water is added to the reactor very slowly, and drips out into the beer cup, the pH rises and drops much slower within the reactor itself.

You shouldn't be controlling Incoming water flow to the reactor. Regardless of speed it will recirc.

Your unit has a specific GPH feed pump tha is recommended.
 
melev - i just figured you would have a pH probe mounted in the chamber...that is what i meant. i have a holder if you want it

Lunchbucket
 
Back
Top