Unless the chemists here in RC would say that the LaMotte is not good for saltwater
It is not and Randy will tell you the same thing, as will Lamotte if you call them and ask or HACH. Randy brought this up long ago here.......
What is Alkalinity
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2002/2/chemistry
The precise endpoint of a total alkalinity titration isn't always the same pH, but rather depends a bit on the nature of the sample (both its ionic strength and its alkalinity). For normal seawater, this endpoint is about pH = 4.2. In freshwater it depends strongly on the alkalinity, with an endpoint of pH = 4.5 for an alkalinity of 2.2 meq/L, and pH = 5.2 for an alkalinity of 0.1 meq/L.
Consequently, total alkalinity tests have been invented that determine how much acid is required to lower the pH into the 4-5 range. Later in this article I'll describe how these tests kits are measuring alkalinity.
4.2 / 4.5 = 9.3 % low, So at 10 dKH on a kit it will really be ~ 11 dKH. NSW is 2.33 Meq / l or 6.5 dKH. So, @ 10% low it will be 2.1 vs 2.33 and that is allot. A 10 % error is allot.
They only way we will know is when somebody get a certified Alk std and tests the meter/test kit, where that person is not affiliated with and company that makes meters or tests kits. I said it before if one wants to really know send kits and meter to ENC Labs for evaluation. NO you can not send them a sample of water for Alk as it can change, unless it an be kept cool enough. For 14 days it must be at or near 4C.
or if you have the time , equipment and patients
KH standards
Here is the information needed to make a KH standard.
* baking soda (sodium bicarbonate)
* sodium carbonate anhydrous
* a lab certified Alkalinity Standard Solution as NA2CO3 in 10mL Ampules From HACH
How accurate you want the standard is up to you.
If you want a more accurate standard than that you could use the alkalinity standard solution from HACH (NIST certified). The reason for the increase in accuracy is because all that needs to be done is the dilution part, the weighing process is removed, which eliminates any errors from moisture in the sample or an inaccurate scale.
To make a KH standard using baking soda you would need the following.
* distilled water
* baking soda (new and unopened would be best)
* .01 gram scale (a calibration weight)
* 500 ml graduated cylinder
* 50 ml graduated cylinder
1. Measure 3000 ml of distilled water using the 500 ml graduated cylinder and put it in a clean container. The container could be an empty 1 gallon distilled water bottle. (I found it easier to use 3000 ml, instead of the often suggested 5000 ml because you can make your standard with 1 gallon of distilled water instead of having to have a larger container or multiple containers)
To read the precise water level in the graduated cylinder.
-Place the cylinder on a flat surface.
-Make sure your eye is on a level plane with the of the meniscus.
-The meniscus is the half-moon curve formed at the surface of liquid.
-Water should be read from the bottom of the meniscus
2. Weigh 3.60 grams of baking soda, add it to the 3000 ml of distilled water and mix well, this will make a 40 dKH / KH standard.
3. Pour 450 ml of distilled water into the 500 ml graduated cylinder.
4. Pour 50 ml of the 40 dKH standard into the 50 ml graduated cylinder
5. Pour the 50 ml of 40 dKH standard into the 500 ml graduated cylinder and mix well, this will give you 500 ml of a 4 dKH standard.
6. If you want a 5 dKH standard instead of a 4 dKH - change step 3 from 450 ml to 400 ml and you will end up with 450 ml of a 5 dKH standard
Taylor makes a std more to our needs
http://www.hxworldwide.com/componen...0-taylor-reagent-pack-standard-solutions.html
LaMotte (one of the best only better by the HACH Digital Titrator)
The question is which LaMotte does one have as they make like 10 of them. Most are in 4 or 5 ppm increments or 0.28 dKH. For me cost wise and accuracy of a prove product, just follow the instructions get you reading in ppm and add 10% for seawater.
Last this, which prove my point over and over
http://reefgizmo.com/2010/10/the-hanna-hi-755-alkalinity-colorimeter-review/
And I do think it is very well down and I do not care what anybody says. It is a know FACT the the LaMotte iS for FW and NOT seawater and what does it show ~ 10% low of the Salifert which it should be
Salifert = 200 ppm sw
LaMotte = 170 ppm and add that ~ 10% 170 + 17 = 187 PPM sw
Hanna - 168 - 175 ppm and add ~10% = 185- 193 ppm sw and lets not forget the Hanna is +/- 10 ppm accuracy. So, 175 - 203 ppm.
So , if we assume the same for all at + /- 10%
Salifert = 200 ppm sw--------------190 - 210 sw
LaMotte = 187 ppm ....177 - 197 ppm sw
Hanna - 168 - 175 ppm ..... 175 - 203 ppm.
I will admit that the Salifert does seem to read higher than that 10 % ~ 18 % And that 200 should be more like ~ 185 ppm
So, any of them are with in that accuracy range. Meaning, on the right day, so to speak, all 3 could come up with 195 ppm sw
YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT ERRORS AND +/- ACCURACY AND NOT SOME NUMBER YOU SEE
Does that 10% work across the board. No, it varies slightly up or down down depending on organics, silica phosphate, borate, pH and Alk.