reefmutt
Active member
I don't think that temp swing would cause general stress.. Many of these corals are adapted to tidal variations in temp, salinity and water level..
Maybe not all of them, I guess.. True deep water sps wouldn't be as tolerant.
Maybe a small in sump fan on a timer would mitigate the temp swings, if the chiller is no longer convenient.
I would be inclined to keep your current zeo regimen. Changing it may cause additional stress. (Assuming it isn't the stressor) At the moment, you have to assume it's providing stability.. I think..
Are you bare bottom? I assume so..
So, before January, you weren't using zeostart 3? When zeostart 3 began, things started looking better until a point in May ish? Is this correct?
Before you were using zeostart3, were you using a different carbon source or was n just staying at 5 on its own..
When n started to climb, why not up your zeostart 3 a bit instead of stopping amigos? As systems age, some nutrients get bound.. Maybe the rise in n was just a natural symptom of the tank aging and a small increase in zeostart may have contained the rise..
Had your fish population changed around that point?
Based on what I am understanding from your history, nutrient swings seem like a potential culprit..
Sorry if I'm rambling, I'm sort of thinking out loud..
Please correct me if I got a fact wrong..
Maybe not all of them, I guess.. True deep water sps wouldn't be as tolerant.
Maybe a small in sump fan on a timer would mitigate the temp swings, if the chiller is no longer convenient.
I would be inclined to keep your current zeo regimen. Changing it may cause additional stress. (Assuming it isn't the stressor) At the moment, you have to assume it's providing stability.. I think..
Are you bare bottom? I assume so..
So, before January, you weren't using zeostart 3? When zeostart 3 began, things started looking better until a point in May ish? Is this correct?
Before you were using zeostart3, were you using a different carbon source or was n just staying at 5 on its own..
When n started to climb, why not up your zeostart 3 a bit instead of stopping amigos? As systems age, some nutrients get bound.. Maybe the rise in n was just a natural symptom of the tank aging and a small increase in zeostart may have contained the rise..
Had your fish population changed around that point?
Based on what I am understanding from your history, nutrient swings seem like a potential culprit..
Sorry if I'm rambling, I'm sort of thinking out loud..
Please correct me if I got a fact wrong..