Flame angel pair

tommmy, did you notice my post? :rollface:

The reason i ask is because it is very possible your smaller angel will be a male in 30 days. If it's female & you want to try and keep it that way -- you could try & put the quarantine tank right up to the front of your big tank.
 
spawner,
I'm not sure about the other 2 angels. I think the coral beauty was male when I got him. The cherub was teeny (< 1 in.) when I got it, so I'm pretty sure it was not a male at that time. I had hoped it would stay female because of the presence of the dominant flame angel. But I don't know if it works that way or not. If I had to bet $10 on it, I'd bet male for the cherub & also the cb
 
S.Michael's book - Angelfishes & Butterflyfishes -

I took a good look again at my pair - the length of the blue on the caudal end of the female is about half or less than half the length of the male's (proportionately to the fish) The black lines are the same about half as wide as the male's.

When you have a male & female to compare, it's pretty easy...with 2 males there are still going to be differences, but they are much more subtle. If you can't decide, I'd bet they are both males.
 
Spawner- I have read about the elusive "primary" or "true" male lysmata shrimp but like you have never seen one. I suppose it is either one of natures rarities or merely an undocumented hypothesis. As for the posibility of self fertilization I'm curious to know why this would be physiologically impossible, I certainly beleved that myself until I had a lone L. amboinensis isolated in a 44 tall seahorse tank carry eggs to maturity. It surprised me but as you stated above : "fish are very creative".

As for the search for sexual dimorphism in the flame angels I think you'd need to look at 1000 or so to confirm it, just because the male of given pair has "more of this" or "less of that" hardly convinces me that you can use this to select for sex. For me behavior is the best indicator.

As for the 20 or 30 day window on sexual assignment I think it's time to stop smokin' the cheap stuff. Why on earth would sexuall assignment begin it's time frame the day the fish gets to your house ???? If that 20-30 day theory was the way it is pretty much every fish we buy would have long since established it's sexual role, and we all know that just isn't the case. I'm sticking with my thoughts expressed in the above post- sex in many species is determined by social and environmental factors and a single fish in isolation has no reason to mature.
 
DavidMSpawner- I have read about the elusive "primary" or "true" male Lysmata shrimp but like you have never seen one. I suppose it is either one of natures rarities or merely an undocumented hypothesis. As for the possibility of self fertilization I'm curious to know why this would be physiologically impossible, I certainly believed that myself until I had a lone L. amboinensis isolated in a 44 tall seahorse tank carry eggs to maturity. It surprised me but as you stated above : "fish are very creative".

Well I am not certain that you would ever have a primary male in this genus. At least not if certain factors are taken into count. When you have a large group of shrimp many will remain as males, but this is a social factor and not predetermined biologically. So when you reduce the group size or remove the male it will after a period of time change to a SH shrimp.

The reason that it is physiologically impossible for the shrimp to self-fertilize is the fact that for a shrimp to be in the male role it requires a calcified exoskeleton for spermatophore implantation. For the shrimp to be in the female role it requires a soft exoskeleton so the spermatophore from the "male role" shrimp can be implanted. So you can't be hard and soft at the same time. Plus, the shrimp would have to be very doubled jointed.
 
Ok I thought it had to do with the molt, hard shell vrs soft. I do remember reading about that when I started looking into my surprise shrimp. I simply cannot explain it any other way, I did have other L amboinensis in another tank in the same room, but certainly no contact between that group and the loner. Maybe I was the one smoki'n the cheap stuff :D
 
Well sometimes they hold their unfertilized eggs for a while (upto 5 days) these tend to look a bit white. Could have been that. They also don't extrude their eggs right after mating, cleaner shrimp will sometimes take a day after mating to lay their eggs.
 
Sweet anyone have any luck pairing up some coral Beauty's?? I have one 3 inch dunno if its male or female?? Should I get a tiny one?? will tehy be aggressive against me Ocelaris pair in my 75??-Sam
 
Wouldn't this be much simpler by putting together a harem of pygmy angels? From everything I've read, they naturally keep together and spawn in harems (single male, many females). I'm sure it's not impossible to keep pairs, and I'm not even going to guess whether or not one or the other increases/decreases your chances for success.
 
About 6 weeks ago I bought 4 cherubs, one larger and 3 smaller. Lost one in the first 24 hrs so now have three. They are in my 125 Caribbean display tank. At first one of the smalls was an outcast and all 3 were quite shy. Now they are a trio and very bold, always out and about even though they are dwarfed by the drums and queen angel. It really only took a couple weeks for the order to establish and there was never any serious aggression. I assume they will end up as a dominant male and two females.
 
Posted by David
As for the 20 or 30 day window on sexual assignment I think it's time to stop smokin' the cheap stuff. Why on earth would sexuall assignment begin it's time frame the day the fish gets to your house ???? If that 20-30 day theory was the way it is pretty much every fish we buy would have long since established it's sexual role, and we all know that just isn't the case. I'm sticking with my thoughts expressed in the above post- sex in many species is determined by social and environmental factors and a single fish in isolation has no reason to mature
David, what I said was it is very possible that the fish could be male because they can make the change in as little as 20-30 days.

The reason it would happen as you said at "your house " is because the fish was likely kept in large groups until the trip to the LFS. With plenty of males around a female would be unlikely to start changing.

If you are looking for a female angel it is indeed wise to try and find one within days of its arrival at the store as most stores keep them in separate tanks. You have a better chance that a female hasn't begun any change. One of the first things that changes is the female starts acting like a male, so even if her change could be reversed it's unlikely she would get along with any male. Also since the initial changes happen before they are shown physically (coloring), that's another reason to pay attn. to how long the fish has been at the store.

I'll repeat that the main factor initiating the sex change is the absence of a male. Is it likely to happen immediately (in the first 30 days)? I dunno ---- there are likely other factors such as stress, is there a male in the tank next door, etc.

As for the search for sexual dimorphism in the flame angels I think you'd need to look at 1000 or so to confirm it, just because the male of given pair has "more of this" or "less of that" hardly convinces me that you can use this to select for sex. For me behavior is the best indicator.
You do not need to look at 1000 flames but it does help to have seen what each looks like. The difference is distinct, but hard to describe. I was 99% sure mine were male & female so I just tossed her in the big tank with the male. But if you aren't certain, why not put them in quarantine together for the behavior test.

a single fish in isolation has no reason to mature
Maybe not, but in my tanks they always do it anyway.


Sam,
Sweet anyone have any luck pairing up some coral Beauty's?? I have one 3 inch dunno if its male or female?? Should I get a tiny one?? will tehy be aggressive against me Ocelaris pair in my 75??-
If you've had your 3" for a long time, chances are it's a male. But I'm not aware of any info on sexual dimorphism in cb's. What I would do if I were you would be to wait patiently ;) for my LFS to get a teeny specimen & try them together in a temporary tank to see if they get along. My guess is that the odds are very good that a tiny one would be female. Tiny = 1 inch from nose to tip of tail fin. Let me know if you get a cb pair!
 
OK, OK... geez. I have been forming pairs and harems of dwarf angels for my customers for a few years and I like my way just fine. If you can identify males & females by looking at them I am impressed but not that talented, I'll stick to behavior :D
 
:confused:
"OK, OK....geez" yourself. I was just defending my position against your comments like "I think it's time to stop smokin' the cheap stuff"
 
Update on attempted flame angel pairing. After removing the smaller flame from the partitioned section of main tank. To a quarantine tank to start hypo treatment because of visible ich on this fish. I noticed some other fish showed signs of ich on fins. I decided it would be best to hypo the main tank also. (Fish only display).

I put the small flame back into main tank with the larger flame. Since it is now hypo also. The larger flame chases the smaller fish through rocks. When the larger fish breaks off the chase the smaller starts to follow the larger through the tank. But not actually chase. The larger is defiantly dominant. No harm has come to the small fish. But his ich got slightly worse probably because of the stress. I put the small back behind partition and ich has cleared up again.

Does the chasing sound like normal pair up behavior in the beginning or do you think I have 2 males?

The fish have not actually fought just big chasing little.
 
mantisagogo said:
:confused:
"OK, OK....geez" yourself. I was just defending my position against your comments like "I think it's time to stop smokin' the cheap stuff"

OK, OK....geez" :confused:
Is it slang?Meaning what,"take it easy"?
 
Luis - sort of. In this case it was meant to mean both "I am sorry" and "I give up" at the same time. :)

Mantisagogo - That is true. And I aplologize for the "smokin" comment too. I was actually trying to compliment you for the ability to see the dimorphism in the species, I know it is there but I just can't see it without a group of fish to compare. I can't simply look at two fish and be sure of sexual ID, but I have been very successful using behavior as my guide so I see no reason to change.

Tommy - oh yeah back to Tommy, it's his thread, right :)

As must be all too obvious at this point there is more than one view to consider. My way is hard with just two fish or any even number for that matter. I always begin with odd numbers, usually 5 or 7. The problem with even numbers is the fish tend to "square off" and you can get some serious damage. With an "odd man out" present there is always an ever changing dynamic and no one fish gets bullied. Anyway with your two (in my view) you probably don't have two mature males and you are off to a good start. If the small one stops eating or begins to hover up in a corner of the tank get it out fast. Why not post some good close up pics and see if Mantis can point out what details we should look for? Maybe your fish are too young but maybe not.
 
http://www.centropyge.net/captive.html#
http://www.centropyge.net/wild.html

After reading the above article and removing tank partition. It looks as if they are forming a pair.


Male
93020male_flame20.JPG



Female

93020fem_flame20.JPG


Thanks Everyone

Tom
 
Last edited:
I tried making a pair by buying 2 SMALL centropyge and leaving them to it. Worked for me, and quite quickly, and it's the method I will try again.
SMALL means small, approx 1 inch in size. I don't really consider 2 inches small, or small enough for this
 
Back
Top