Hanna or Sailifert?

I like both. I've noticed some minor inconsistencies in the Hana regents lately so I'm currently using Salifert, but wouldn't have an issue going back to the Hana checker.
 
I like them both. Hanna is quicker and easier to use. They both get accurate readings although I find that mine never match. My salifert always runs 0.3dkh higher. I don't know which one is the correct level and it doesn't matter too much as long as I only use the same one to match my tank with my W/C water.
 
To throw another one into the equation I have been using the Red Sea kit for years and it has always done me good. The change in the titration colors is far easier to spot than comparing colors against a chart.
 
To throw another one into the equation I have been using the Red Sea kit for years and it has always done me good. The change in the titration colors is far easier to spot than comparing colors against a chart.

+1.... love the combo pro kit for calcium, alkalinity, and magnesium.
hate their nitrate phosphate kit
 
With the salifert kit, Do you guys keep the bubble in the syringe as per the directions or do you fill the syringe up all the way to 1ml with water?

That was confusing.
 
I find the Red Sea Alk test the simplest test to use. Just a vial of water and 1ml of fluid in the syringe. Salifert is good too but it's a 2 step process. The kit quality & ergonomics of the Red Sea product is superior IMO. It's well thought out. I find both kits have an easy to discern color change and are both accurate enough for my needs. But I don't like the 1ml syringes in these kits. The piston is black & so is the lettering on the syringe, so it can be a challenge to read for some people. I have to look closely in good light with some dime store eye glasses. Both companies should include extra syringes in the kits as they can break before the kits reagents are used up.

BENT: Yes that air space should always be there. It's been accounted for in the design. You can prove it to yourself if you have a small measurement tube. I was a little innerved when I first saw this, thinking that the airspace might change for test to test, but it works.
 
I find the Red Sea Alk test the simplest test to use. Just a vial of water and 1ml of fluid in the syringe. Salifert is good too but it's a 2 step process. The kit quality & ergonomics of the Red Sea product is superior IMO. It's well thought out. I find both kits have an easy to discern color change and are both accurate enough for my needs. But I don't like the 1ml syringes in these kits. The piston is black & so is the lettering on the syringe, so it can be a challenge to read for some people. I have to look closely in good light with some dime store eye glasses. Both companies should include extra syringes in the kits as they can break before the kits reagents are used up.

BENT: Yes that air space should always be there. It's been accounted for in the design. You can prove it to yourself if you have a small measurement tube. I was a little innerved when I first saw this, thinking that the airspace might change for test to test, but it works.

the air bubble is a non issue ,it doesn't matter....as long as you draw the plunger up to 1.0ml ,it will be accurate you are measuring how far the plunger moves
 
With the salifert kit, Do you guys keep the bubble in the syringe as per the directions or do you fill the syringe up all the way to 1ml with water?

That was confusing.

Just ignore that there is air. Pretend it's liquid. Since you are doing a titration, all you care about is the volume of reagent you are adding. The fact that there is air making up some of the volume of the syringe doesn't matter unless you were to use the full volume of the syringe, and count the air pocket as liquid.
 
Regarding the bubble, I always figured it was to account for the liquid that is in the little tip at the end of the syringe. The numbers start at the base of the cylinder of the syringe and the liquid in the tip should equal the space used up by the air pocket.
 
Here is a picture from the Red Sea instructions booklet where they describe how to fill the syringe. It shows that you leave the air pocket as is and it is counted in the liquid measurement.

IMG_6168_zpsh1iuxxnd.jpg
 
Posts 10, 11 & 12 are all saying the same thing I think which is correct: Draw the liquid up to where the bottom ring on the piston is on the 1 ml marking. Ignore the air space under the piston. The tip will be full of liquid.

Take your reading from the same ring, again gnoring the air space you see, and you'll be fine. As the instruction #13 say. Don't jam the tip on too tightly.

I don't really like these syringes all that much. They're delicate and hard to read. Anybody know of good alternatives that are easy to get mail order? I'm not keen on shopping for these in a pharmacy...
 
Last edited:
Thanks all for the responses, I am currently using API and have had no issues the Hanna is way more expensive easier to use by the looks of it. I need a new Alk test so was just throwing it out there what everyone uses and likes
 
I find API to be very easy for ALK

Same here. Unless you need more precision for some reason API Alk kit is perfect for me. It tests in the range I look to be in, I get consistent results time and time again, it's cheap, and accurate enough for me. It's very easy to see the color change.
 
Comparing the API to the salifert, the API reads much higher for me.

The API I am getting like 9
The salifert I'm getting like 6.

Which one is correct is anyone's guess.
 
Here is a picture from the Red Sea instructions booklet where they describe how to fill the syringe. It shows that you leave the air pocket as is and it is counted in the liquid measurement.

IMG_6168_zpsh1iuxxnd.jpg

When I pull my plunger to the 1ml like in the photo, I only have a little over 0.8ml of solution in the syringe not 0.9ml like the photo. This confuses me and make me wonder if I am reading the end result right..
 
Back
Top