clydog
In Memoriam
Thanks clydog - Have you tried the retests and if so, can you share your process and results? It's entirely possible my checker is defective, and I probably would have come to the same conclusion until rehypes post. A few things make wonder...
- I can't image a defect that would produce the results seen. Seemingly consistent and predicable initial and retest results that vary widely, despite being taken seconds apart with the same sample and...a problem that disappears by simply allowing the C2 sample to sit for 7 minutes.
- If I understood rehypes comment correctly, he also had similar findings, hence the development of his 7 minute process and lastly...
- If Hanna thought my unit defective, it seems to me they would have simply said so and offered to replace it - problem solved, rather than ignore the issue entirely.
Although I don't understand why, at this point I suspect the solution is to allow the C2 sample to rest for 7 minutes after mixing. If this is correct, I wonder if many using the HI 736 aren't getting incorrect (consistent, but higher than actual) PO4 readings when following the directions provided by Hanna?
my first test is usually one of the highest,i think its from the reagent not being fully dissolved....but even then its still within the 3-5 ppb range (rarely 5 ppb difference,usually 1-3 ppb difference)