First of all round tank. . And second a little more then twice the length of the animal for depth more like 4 times the animal I would consider more appropriate. .. so more like a 96x 96...
I would have no intentions to pay for such a tank. . Nor would I call it a shark tank if I didn't intend to keep sharks in it..
As for my tank I have 1 5g tank. ...and one 1" damsel in it.
Not being a hater nor do I appreciate the snide remarks when nothing I said was was wrong. ..
to reach their own I guess. ..I admire you building a larger tank for larger fish though rather then allowing them a stressful life banging into walls in a tank to small
96x96 for a round tank? Does this mean 96in in diameter and 96in in height? That is pretty high. How about oval or race track shaped? Do they not work? Anyway you are wrong in your advice and math. not all sharks need round tanks.
You say that a shark needs 4x length and 2x width. A bali catshark obtains a size of about 1.5 ft. This will need a 6ft length tank with a 3 ft width. Which his build surpasses.
I am sure he had and hopefully still has the intention of getting a shark and that is why he put that title. But have some members who don't know what they are talking about, giving bad information and trying to guilt him into thinking he is a demon for wanting a shark. That is why he went back on the idea.
You should enjoy your 5 gallon tank with a damsel and leave the big tanks and big fish to people who know what they are talking about and handle it.
What experiences do you have with sharks and large tanks?
To the OP reef sites are a terrible place to get advice on building a shark pond. I know the few shark people that are here will agree with me.
Last edited: