is one week for shipment of LR too long?

Pandora:

Yes, you did.... Quite eloquently too.....

What I'm getting a little fed up with is all these people are simply repeating stuff because it sounds "cool" with no idea why it might be "cool" and, worse yet it is often detrimental to either the livestock in people's tanks or those people's level of knowledge because the advice is bad in the first place.

RC is one of the biggest reef/aquarium BBS's on the net... It's a shame that they are allowing rubbish to spread worldwide because this misinformation is allowed to be consistently posted without challenge.

The information here _should_ be:-

1. Opinion - if there are multiple ways of doing the same thing. But this should not be presented as fact.

2. Fact - insofar as it is based _solidly_ in science, nature and common sense.

3. A suggestion. ie: you think it might work but you "disclaim" that by stating up front that your suggestion is based, not on fact, common sense or science but on a "gut feeling" or anecdotal information.

Anything other than that degrades this site, the information on it or the ability of others to get the information they actually need... Which is wrong.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6468132#post6468132 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stingers81
yes...i just got the tank set up and i was going to cycle it with the LR that i am yet to receive
I was going to get 30lbs of base rock and seed it with this one....will it be ok to use the delayed LR as base and get a new fresh box of LR and seed it with that....if so....i would just ask the guy to refund me the amount that it would cost me to buy base rock
what do you think?
thanks for the replies by the way

That it what I would do. 100% refund is asking quit a bit. You should be able to get it at cost and the seller should be able to get you a refund on the shipping amount. Even decent base rock is $2/lb. I would think a partial refund shouldnt be an issue.

I would use that as my base rock and seed with some fresh LR. But I would also cure it in the tank with out lights (so no algae bloom) for an extended amount of time to remove all of the Detritus, PO4 and NO3 from the decay. 6-8 weeks I'd say, atleast 4. Should not need to cook new LR for a full 4-6 months.

I've got some new LR "curing in the dark" (right in my display) going on 6 weeks now. Its getting close to being ready for lights.
Its about 80% clean by looks but still pulling out a decent amount of skim and testing a little high for nitrates.
 
G: heh, I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist! I think we are actually in agreement about the substance of your statements. Maybe I'm just cynical, but I think most people here stop reading after the first 2 sentences if it isn't a simple answer, which so very few things are... like how many times do you see detailed explanations of reef chemistry glossed over, and then the OP posts a response: "Uh, ok, so does that mean I can get the 10 tangs or not."

I do agree on the knee jerk repeating of mantras thing. Have to step back and think of the "why" in each case.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6469501#post6469501 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by G_cuvier
words...


For such a long-winded post ranting about how rock "cookers" are wrong, you sure come off as being wrong in guessing why it is suggested.

Also, I rather enjoy your theory on "if its so good, why doesn't everyone do it", in regards to a hobby that goes through significant theory shifts every decade.

Rock cooking theory deserves far more attention and merit regardless of whether you run a BB or a DSB, and I'm quite sure that if DSB'ers began their tanks by cooking their rock, the lifespan of an untouched DSB would extend a great deal. That is neither here nor there, however.

It's quite obvious that his rock has undergone severe stress resulting in severe die off. I propose he cook the rock outside of his display tank to spare him unnecessary work in trying to deal with outrageous diatom and nuissance algae problems.

I wish I had done the same for my tank.
 
wow
thanks for the info....
one more question
I will wait until the rock gets here to see what condition the rock is in
if its somewhat decent...I will put it in the tank and start the cycle
I will then get about 30lbs of LR from my lfs....my question is....Do i wait until the delayed LR cures or just put in the new LR with the decaying one???
thanks again...and hope we all get along :)
 
Pandora:

Have to step back and think of the "why" in each case.

My point exactly..... Mantras are fine when they are appropriate for the situation at hand - other than that they are usually quite wrong. We are in agreement, I'm sure.

Kong:

For such a long-winded post ranting about how rock "cookers" are wrong, you sure come off as being wrong in guessing why it is suggested.

Where, exactly, did I say that rock cooking is wrong. It's a sensible, well thought out and logical solution to a problem. However, it isn't a solution to this problem, period.

Pray tell.... Where did the vast amounts of phosphate and other undesirable nutrients suddenly appear from in a box of rock that has little water in it. Furthermore, please tell me how these vast amounts of undesirable have managed to leach themselves deep into the rock and lay themselves down with the distinct lack of water in the system.

There are _exactly_ the same amount of nutrients in the box as there were at the moment the box was closed. Yes, they may have "changed form" but it is in no way comparable to the way undesirables leach into and lay themselves down over periods of a year or several in a normal aquarium environment. Thus, cooking the rock is an inappropriate solution to this problem. In fact, whatever life is left - and it seems that you might be surprised how much can still be alive unless the rock has been frozen - will be further detrimentally affected by placing them in a dark box for 3 months.

Rock cooking theory deserves far more attention and merit regardless of whether you run a BB or a DSB

I'm sorry, but you are going to have to try a lot harder to derail this thread and move it into a squealing match about such a silly topic as that..... :rolleyes:

Stingers:

I would suggest the following to maximize the survival of what remains alive on your rock and as stated above you might be very surprised.

Before arrival I would have two large tubs of saltwater ready. The parameters aren't that important at this point but it would be nice if it were at least room temp, (in the 70s), and the SG be above 1020 because we aren't going to have anything living here.

When the rock arrives get a peg and place it firmly on your nose. Take the boxes to the garage _before_ you open them - The stink of a dead bivalve, (clams etc.), - and they will most probably be dead if there were any on the rock - will linger in your living room a lot longer than your SO would like and it puts something of a strain on their acceptance of your new found hobby.... ;).

Pop the boxes one at a time and stand back as you open them. You'll know immediately how bad or good each box is. Take the rock out piece by piece and shake it vigorously for 30 seconds in the first tub. Upon completion take the rock out and, starting with the rock away from your face waft air across it towards your now unpegged nose. If it still smells foul you will need to use your nose to locate the source of the foul smell and then do whatever it takes to remove it. This can be quite difficult since many bivalves will be buried in the rock itself. If you can get them cracked or to open up then re-rinse the rock in tub one. Repeat this process until you simply can't make the piece of rock smell any better and place it into tub two. Repeat this with each piece of rock until complete.

Take the rock from tub 2 and scatter it about your aquarium in such a way as to allow maximum water flow around them - we aren't aquascaping here, we are trying to expose as much of the rock's surface as possible to water - you might even consider placing some form of makeshift rack on the sand so that the water can flow cleanly underneath it. Take every form of flow you have in the tank, (powerheads, returns, closed loops), and direct it as best you can to pass under the rock without causing the sand to shift. Keep the tank lights off but don't worry too much about ambient light unless it is direct sunlight.

Go back to your tubs. Empty them carefully until there is about 1" of water left in there and use a flashlight to carefully inspect the rubble etc. in the bottom. You may be lucky and find some life no matter how small. Catch it and move it to your tank. If you find crustaceans or starfish etc. that seem almost dead you might want to try keeping them in a separate container with fresh saltwater and appropriate heat and circulation to see if they revive. I wouldn't put them in the main tank since if they don't make it they will add to your problem. Additionally I will suggest something later that would harm them so a separate container would be very nice.

When all life is out of the tubs rinse them out and mix new saltwater to match the conditions of your main tank. I don't know what your daily schedule is but I would recommend testing for Ammonia every 8 hours and change the appropriate volume of water each time to maintain the level of ammonia as low as possible - preferably below 0.2ppm. So if you NH4 tests at 0.3 ppm then you would want to do a 50% water change bringing it down to 0.15ppm. The lower you can keep it the better. I'd like to see you keep it at or below 0.1ppm but that may be impractical.

Before others jump on me:- Yes, I am well aware that this will extend the cycle time - I'm not interested in the time, I'm interested in protecting the life remaining on his rock.

After a couple of days I would start testing for Nitrites as well as Ammonia and use the same water change regime to maintain the Nitrites below 0.6ppm - again, I'd rather see you keep them below 0.3ppm.

Keep the "juggling" act up as long as necessary doing the water as appropriate to minimize the concentrations of NH4 and NO2 until both remain at zero for 3 days then aquascape your tank and recheck NH4 and NO2 levels for a further three days. If, at any time during this process you have noticed a downward trend in the level of ammonia and it starts going back up again you need to do the smell test on every rock and remove any new dead matter that you missed earlier or has died subsequently - you'll be surprised how easy it is to miss an embedded bivalve and similarly surprised by how small a bivalve can foul your tank completely. If they remain at zero test for Nitrates and do an appropriate water change to bring the level down as close as possible to zero, certainly below 10ppm. This whole process may take 30 days or so but if you are lucky and cleaned as much of the dead stuff off the rocks it could be done in as little as 15 days. You can assist in expediting this process by turning the heater up so that the water exceeds 86 degrees since this is the low end of the optimum temperature for the metabolism of the bacteria you are trying to culture, 88 would be nice. NOTE: Do not do this in a stocked tank - you will kill your livestock.

There.... That should keep you busy for a few days... ;) If you have any other questions feel free to ask or PM me.
 
if i'm not mistaken, many rock cooking proponents recommend cooking fresh live rock straight out of the ocean- not just rock that's "been in an aquarium for an extended period of time."
 
if i'm not mistaken, many rock cooking proponents recommend cooking fresh live rock straight out of the ocean- not just rock that's "been in an aquarium for an extended period of time."

I'd suggest that was illogical. The concentrations of the undesirables and the way in which they are used in nature would not allow the buildup to take place in the same way they do in a closed system. If that were the case then after a thousand years or less then the reef would crash..... ;)
 
fair enough.
i'm not going to debate rock coocking with you- there's hundreds of pages of threads on the subject.

i think bomber and some of the others would take issue with your statements though.

to the original poster- i would put any additional rock in AFTER this ordered rock comes and is cured. i doubt much will be left alive on it (but i don't really know) and i would think you'll have a pretty significant ammonia spike. that would likely kill off anything on any additional live rock you buy to put in there.
 
Ooops:

i would put any additional rock in AFTER this ordered rock comes and is cured.

Absolutely. I forgot that question. Toonces is spot on. No point risking life on good rock by throwing it into an unstable toxic environment. Thank you Toonces.

Bomber et al are free to have their opinions as I am to mine. Since no-one can _prove_ they are right they remain just that, opinions.

Back to the OP's issues... ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6473470#post6473470 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by G_cuvier
Pandora:

Pray tell.... Where did the vast amounts of phosphate and other undesirable nutrients suddenly appear from in a box of rock that has little water in it. Furthermore, please tell me how these vast amounts of undesirable have managed to leach themselves deep into the rock and lay themselves down with the distinct lack of water in the system.



You give me the impression that nothing is dead inside of this rock. I guess the week long dry shipment (after living in an unknown environment at his seller, and his seller's seller) has had no ill-effect on all of the life that once lived inside of that rock. So he should place this rotting rock inside of his tank and allow his sandbed to get seeded by it. I see.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't promote rock cooking only for rocks that come from other tanks. I promote cooking for all rocks, because the care of live rocks shipped from their sources (short of TBS rock, which is always kept submerged and very moist except for the final 24 hours) is appalling and unknown. That aside, let's not even get into the absolute fact that this rock HAS been sitting in other tanks packed with nutrients and phosphates. I highly doubt whole sellers are keeping these rocks in regularly cleaned system. Somehow, I rather imagine giant vats of liverock sitting in water that is otherwise unchanged, and is not heavily protein skimmed, or scrubbed. Wouldn't you consider such an environment as being nutrient rich? You contend this has no effect on the rock and it is the same as when the rock was wisked from the ocean's bottom? Interesting.


There are _exactly_ the same amount of nutrients in the box as there were at the moment the box was closed. Yes, they may have "changed form" but it is in no way comparable to the way undesirables leach into and lay themselves down over periods of a year or several in a normal aquarium environment. Thus, cooking the rock is an inappropriate solution to this problem. In fact, whatever life is left - and it seems that you might be surprised how much can still be alive unless the rock has been frozen - will be further detrimentally affected by placing them in a dark box for 3 months.

What life is that? What life are we concerned of here that shouldnt be in the dark? I see you have no issues with placing the rock in his aquarium with the lights off for several more weeks. What photosynthetic life are you trying to protect? Are you claiming there are hard corals that could be hurt by this process? Perhaps you should look into more detail at the live species of encrusting corals bomber was able to sustain while his rock cooked.


The funniest part about your posts is that you are advocating rock-cooking lite, and don't even realize it. Look at all your speak of dunking and swishing and regular water changes. You are your own worst enemy.

The only parting issue I have with you is you feel the need to let the death that is slowly leaking out of his rock fall into his sandbed. That is where we part ways.

I think the flaw with curing the rock in most tanks is two fold:

1) it is more of a pain to work in our tanks, setup in their locations, than it is in a garage over some buckets or bins. Why cure your rock with such a hassle? Rock slides, glass/acrylic scratches or cracking dangers. Leave the tank where it is, and take the rock to a more convenient area where you can inspect it and change the water more easily as this process unfolds.

2) Sand. Your rock is shedding, organic matter is dying, and your sand bed is absorbing organics that could otherwise be avoided all together. If you insist on curing your rock in your tank, wait on the sand. Watch what settles on the bottom, and like what others have done, test that settled matter for nitrates and phosphates. Like others, you'll be shocked at the concentrations.

If we could all get our rocks direct from fiji, still submerged in water as they came from the ocean, I think you'd fine more successful tanks, but we dont. Rock is tossed on shores and beaches, left in stagnant bins or sitting in dry boxes for days. Don't kid yourself, our rock receives more abuse than we'd like to admit, and we owe it to the longevity of our tanks to be sure we protect what is alive by removing what is already dead.
 
(short of TBS rock, which is always kept submerged and very moist except for the final 24 hours) is appalling and unknown

Ahh.. Ok... TBS rock is ok.. The rest is crap? I'm very familiar with the way TBS and others aquaculture, collect, keep and ship their rock. I've been there and seen their facilities, been on their boats, dived with them and purchased their rock.

I won't deny that rock, especially that from abroad, is badly handled as are the livestock in many cases but the piece you seem to be missing is the mechanisms that leach the undesirables deep into the rock are not as effective in the ocean due to the lower levels of free nutrients _and_ take a long time in a closed system - it's not a few day affair nor is it simply a matter of weeks. Even in the most inappropriately maintained closed system it would take several months for the leaching to take place - we aren't talking about detritus sitting in the holes here we are talking about the molecules themselves of the undesirables migrating deep into the structure of the rock itself.

What photosynthetic life are you trying to protect?

OK... You're inattentiveness is beginning to bother me.... Where on earth did I mention keeping photosynthetic life alive? Keeping the lights down is to prevent algae growth as the _free_ nutrients, (those in the water column and resting _on_ the rock), rise.

The funniest part about your posts is that you are advocating rock-cooking lite, and don't even realize it

I absolutely understand what I am recommending - what on earth do you think the difference between curing rock and cooking rock is other than time? Same process - the only difference is the targetted population of nutrients. Curing is targetted at the superficial nutrients while cooking is targetted at the embedded nutrients. While cooking is not explicitly intended to bring the levels of nitrogen fixing bacteria to appropriate level it does do so.

You are clearly one of the rock cooking mantra repeaters - if you want to continue this discussion let's take it to a thread of it's own - you start and PM me where you put it. This thread is stinger's to help him with his current situation. OK?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6474012#post6474012 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by G_cuvier
Ahh.. Ok... TBS rock is ok.. The rest is crap?


Please avoid the use of strawmen or putting words into my mouth. I merely brought up the fact that TBS is a known distributor of rock who avoids allowing their rock to sit out dry longer than any other seller i've encountered.

I would personally not use TBS rock for my tanks, however.

I won't deny that rock, especially that from abroad, is badly handled as are the livestock in many cases but the piece you seem to be missing is the mechanisms that leach the undesirables deep into the rock are not as effective in the ocean due to the lower levels of free nutrients _and_ take a long time in a closed system - it's not a few day affair nor is it simply a matter of weeks. Even in the most inappropriately maintained closed system it would take several months for the leaching to take place - we aren't talking about detritus sitting in the holes here we are talking about the molecules themselves of the undesirables migrating deep into the structure of the rock itself.

OK... You're inattentiveness is beginning to bother me.... Where on earth did I mention keeping photosynthetic life alive? Keeping the lights down is to prevent algae growth as the _free_ nutrients, (those in the water column and resting _on_ the rock), rise.

I brought it up because I cant possibly rationalize what life you're trying to protect and that you insist is dying via rock cooking. Once again you still haven't answered it. I see now you arent referring to photosynthetic life, so I am officially stumped at what life you think is being lost by cooking, that isnt being lost by standard curing processes.

I absolutely understand what I am recommending - what on earth do you think the difference between curing rock and cooking rock is other than time? Same process - the only difference is the targetted population of nutrients. Curing is targetted at the superficial nutrients while cooking is targetted at the embedded nutrients. While cooking is not explicitly intended to bring the levels of nitrogen fixing bacteria to appropriate level it does do so.

You are clearly one of the rock cooking mantra repeaters - if you want to continue this discussion let's take it to a thread of it's own - you start and PM me where you put it. This thread is stinger's to help him with his current situation. OK?

You were the one who attacked the rock cookers, not the other way around. Attempting to field some "higher ground" attitude at this point seems counter productive, and instead a retreat, though I really don't understand why you feel that's necessary after your lengthy above thesis.

Just continue to belittle anyone who suggests a technique contrary to yours and dismiss them as sheep, as you have repeatidly done in every response.
 
All I'm gonna say, AND THIS IS TO THE ORIGINAL POSTER:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE read and listen to what G_cuvier has said and suggested for you to do. He is very right in this matter, he is not saying rock cooking is bad, just that it is NOT warranted in YOUR situation! He has, BY FAR, offered you the best advice, IMO.

Brianna:rollface:

[violation]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the live rock is cured at the LFS, then wait until the cycle is complete. If you get it from the LFS to your house in water and minimal time, it shouldn't have much die off to kick off another cycle.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6474350#post6474350 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Mrs.kbmdale

quote removed

Wow, King Kong of the idiots? I'm not even arguing or flaming. I continue to be puzzled why there is so much hostility over this topic, and I continue to be shocked by how aggressive and PERSONAL people become over it. I don't care whether you run DSB, SSB, or BB, and in the end I dont care whether you cook, cure, or eat your rock. It's just a simple discussion on techniques for the longevity and sustainability of our tanks. Isn't that what we're all after? When did this become a competition where the stakes involve personal insults?

I suggested that he cure his rock a little longer, with a little more care, and that makes me an idiot who just wants to argue. I think I am beginning to understand why so many people just pick up and leave over such childish behavior (on both sides).
 
Kng-Kong,

For my comment, I am TRULY sorry, that WAS out of line and childish! I do hope you accept my apology.

Brianna

btw, YGPM
 
Back
Top