fishguy306
Member
Dang, that is a lot of coverage! I wish I could afford to just buy plenty and have a couple different sets running, but on a 1000+ gal tank things add up a bit too quickly.
Dang, that is a lot of coverage! I wish I could afford to just buy plenty and have a couple different sets running, but on a 1000+ gal tank things add up a bit too quickly.
I'm looking at going the Kessil route to light a very large tank, I'm curious what kind of spread people have gotten from mounting them high above the tank, such as 24" above the surface? It would be a predator tank, so I do not need high par out of them. I'm looking at the A160WE.
I had one person claim 2' high I could probably get a decent amount of light over a 48x48" area. Does it sound like there is any truth to this? I know I would get shadows on the bottom depending on the scaping, but that isn't an issue. With no coral I'm not worried about it being even, just enough to see the fish and look good.
LMAO, that's a real problem bro.
Aaron
For a FO you can get by with surprisingly little. I don't know about 48x48 spread from the A160, but for reference we light our 700g FO systems at work (10'x3'x3') with three 165w cheapo LED units (basically Mars Aqua with no optics). And they're only dialed up to 75% power or so.
Ok, that may be worded a bit badly lol. But when you go the plywood route it sucks to spend double what you did on the tank in lighting alone lol
![]()
72x30x24
That's a ton of light 8x T5' + 3 Kessil A350/360 + 2 Reefbrites. Tank doesn't even look that full to need that much of light. Have your got par readings?
That's the top notch lighting IMHO, Kessil 360s+T5s!
Aaron
That's a ton of light 8x T5' + 3 Kessil A350/360 + 2 Reefbrites. Tank doesn't even look that full to need that much of light. Have your got par readings?