Killing the Cannister Filter Myth

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9477799#post9477799 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ninjafish
Hello again kc,
By rubble I just meant pieces of LR that have been broken up to fit inside the canister.


by rubble i mean anything smaller then softball size pieces of LR


As far as surface area, I don't think it makes much of a difference whether the rock is as big as a persons head or as big as a golf ball - LR is porous enough that the bacteria is living all through the rock... not just the edges.


CORRECT, but the part you fail to see is the first 2-3 inches of the rock have nitrifying bacteria that are consuming all the available O2 and the De-nitrifying bacteria colonize the surfaces deeper in the rock. oops, rubble doesn't have these deeper surfaces so no de-nitrification takes place.


This porosity is what contributes to the massive surface area of LR - not just the outside edges. I'm sorry but your last post is the first time you have suggested that there is a difference, filtration wise, between a single piece of LR and multiple, smaller pieces of LR.


no it's not, I've stated in just about every post that rubble doesn't have sufficient mass to form anaerobic regions and it therefore only has the ability to quickly reduce waste to NO3 and then become a nitrate factory when placed in high current environments like your lovely canister filter.

I have never heard this assertion before and I hope it isn't because I don't have half an intellect. I thought your were saying that LR adds NO3 - I wasn't trying to twist your words. Now you clarified it to state that LR rubble adds NO3. So should people stop using it in their HOB filters too?


their HOB filters are low flow and aren't as readily producing NO3 but none the less they are, again water changes are used by 99% of nano tank owners to controll that.

I don't want to sound like a wise@$$ - I honestly can't see how the bacteria "knows" what sized piece of LR it is on. I can't picture how LR rubble bacteria would process the water differently from bacteria living on 'solid' pieces of LR (which are themselves just larger pieces of broken rocks).

as mentioned a few lines up, the bacteria in the outer portions of the live rock are using up all available O2 from the water in their job of nitrification, they can no longer live in the depths of the rock because nitrification bacteria require O2 to live, de-nitrification bacteria on the other hand can not live in the presence of O2 and will ONLY form in the depths of the rock that are void of O2, and small rubble or very pours rocks never become void of O2, in areas of high flow the levels of O2 go deeper into the rocks as well, your canister filter keeps a constant flow of fresh O2 filled water circulating around the rubble and it will always be abundant in O2 even in the center most portions of the rubble inside it.


I understand where you are coming from and I can see how it can be confusing.
The bacteria in the LR is what converts waste to nitrates - but that isn't the same thing as saying that LR causes nitrates.


sure it does, LR holds most of the bacteria that are breaking down waste, take all those bacteria away and you'll not have a nitrogen cycle (hard to keep a sterile environment without killing everything else though)

It is confusing but it might help if I give an example - sorry if it is silly but it is the best I can do on short notice.

Garbage trucks are required to convert curbside garbage into landfill waste.

Saying that increasing the amount of LR in a system will increase the amount of NO3 is like saying that increasing the number of garbage trucks will increase the amount of waste in the landfill.


the more trucks you've got delivering trash that is readily available will defiantly put more trash into the landfill. you're trucking it in and nothing is taking it out, it gets more in, thats simple math. the LR is the landfill, not the garbage truck.....

The garbage trucks and the LR are the capacity to process the waste -


no the garbage truck is the fish in your tank, the food you toss in that doesn't get ate and any other means of introducing waste into the system, the LR is the landfill, it's processing the waste. if the landfill is all small little spots throughout the country then there are no biological breakdowns in the waste and it'll forever be just a pile of garbage (like the rubble) but if it's a large landfill the waste is absorbed and goes through a complete nitrogen cycle and becomes compost and released as nitrogen gas (just like the bubbles from deep in the LR and from DSBs


the actual waste comes from the fish and food in the system.


yeap, the garbage trucks of the system as mentioned a line or two up.

Adding LR will not increase NO3, only the system's capacity to process fish poop and detritus - which is converted to NO3 (that's what's got you hung up). The LR can't make NO3 from nothing - it is dependant on the amount of raw waste. If that waste is a fixed amount, you can't keep adding LR to keep increasing your NO3 output - you can't create something from nothing.


you're not making something from nothing, the nitrogen cycle has stages, waste is broken down into ammonia, that ammonia is broken down into nitrites and those nitrites are broken down into nitrates and in situations where you have anaerobic conditions those nitrates are broken down into nitrogen gas and they bubble up and out of the water via gas exchange at the surface. unfortunately that last step is missing in your canister filter and in systems that have only small rock and high flow.


Not only does LR not add to nitrates, it actually reduces nitrates. It isn't as efficient at it as a pure anaerobic environment like you suggested, but it still does reduce nitrates. That is why we have LR in our tanks.


yeap we have large pieces of LR that have anaerobic areas and if we don't then NEVER will it ever convert NO3 to nitrogen gas.

Don't believe me? Just read up on LR. Or type "live rock reduce nitrates?" (without the quotes) in google and read what comes up.


i know exactly what works and how it works, I've only been doing this close to 30 yrs and unlike you after only 4 i didn't think i knew it all and considered myself a myth buster to things that have been proven in depth many times over.


To repeat myself for the last time (I hope).

Canister filters have gotten a bad rap as being nitrate factories.


it's not a bad rap, it's the truth the only way you can avoid it is by removing any bio-logical media from inside one, LR rubble included

enough time wasted on this thread, continue with your myth busting.

kc
 
SOMETHING FOR NOTHING

if you don't believe what i posted you can continue your myth busting by building a denitrator coil, you'll see first hand how they have nothing but water flow through a 75' length of 1/4OD tubing but as the water passes through the coil and starts to form bacteria (just like the LR rubble has on it) the output stream of water (which entered at the same levels at the tank) will first have an extreme elevation in NO2, onward of several hundred PPM, then as the coil matures those levels quickly drop and NO3 levels will jump to several hundred PPM then if you know what you're doing and adjust the flow rate appropriately they'll drop to 0ppm coming out of the coil.

at the end of about 5-6 weeks you then have a self regulating nitrate reduction apparatus that provides the tank with about 60 gph of waste free water, it's like getting a 60 gallon water change every day for free so you do get something for nothing :) the only thing going into the coil is tank water and it's only going down a little 75' length of tubing before it's put right back into the tank, a lot like a long siphoning hose.......

kc
 
enough time wasted on this thread, continue with your myth busting.

kc

Haha I almost believed you for a second there.

When I said something from nothing I meant that you couldn't keep increasing nitrates by adding LR - I still maintain that LR reduces nitrates but even if it didn't you can't make more NO3 just by adding rock if there isn't excess NH3 in the first place. It is the waste that determines how much nitrates you have - not the rock.
The coil is the same thing - you aren't getting something from nothing - you are feeding the bacteria in the coil with the same waste that the bacteria in the LR consume. The only difference is you are using the furthest reaches of the coil for anaerobic reactions because by the time the water reaches that area it has been deprived of its oxygen and it is the turf of the anaerobic bacteria.
I don't see how coil denitrifiers and rocks larger than softballs is any benefit to those of us here in the nano forum.


i know exactly what works and how it works, I've only been doing this close to 30 yrs and unlike you after only 4 i didn't think i knew it all and considered myself a myth buster to things that have been proven in depth many times over.

Were you serious when you wrote that? How long should I be in this hobby before I can come into other peoples' threads and act like I do know it all?

Seriously dude, a little etiquette goes a long way. There is absolutely no difference in the turnover rates inside the HOB filters and a canister filter. The HOB puts out much less flow, but is also much lower volume - so the turnover rate in the filter is the same as it would be with higher flow in a filter with greater volume. If you are such an expert on nanos, and LR pieces smaller than softballs don't work, and HOB and canister filters suck so bad, then why are we having such success? What should we be using instead?

For a nano tank, a canister filter with LR is the best filtration solution I have found (besides tying it into a much larger sump/system which isn't really a nano then). For two years my nitrates were undetectable (of course I was also doing weekly water changes, but that is something that I do with all my tanks) - if you have something constructive, like a better way of filtering our tanks, then by all means, share it with us 4 year guys.

- Chad
 
Sorry everyone for the confusion in this thread. Another member explained it best what I should have said in the first place.

And I'm not smoking crack I promise.

I am suggesting to not use the canister as a mechanical filter with all the floss and filter media that can in turn trap detritus and pollute your water - but instead to use it as a biological filter the same as a sump with LR (or a HOB with LR).

I was trying to state that if used that way, they don't have the drawbacks that have given canister filters a bad name in this hobby and are the same as the HOB that have been converted to be biological filters - exept they are bigger and take up less room in the display.

Sorry for making it all more complicated than it needed to be. Used as a boilogical filter, canister filters are a great option for a SW nano tank. It was as mechanical filters that they caused problems - just like with any mechanical SW filter that isn't kept total clean.

And especailly sorry to kc for getting all riled up. I was out of line and was really making things more complicated than necessary. No hard feelings I hope.
Thanks,

- Chad
 
Last edited:
I am a big fan of canister filters on my freshwater tanks. I am not convinced that small pieces of live rock won't have the same effect as the regular filter media (bio balls, etc...). Maybe if you use large pieces of live rock in the canister then the bacteria that converts NO3 to nitrogen can exist.

The bacteria that converts ammonia to NO2 and the bacteria that converts NO2 to N03 live on the surface of live rock which is oxygen rich. The bacteria that convert NO3 to nitrogen gas live near the center of live rock where it is oxygen poor. That's why I don't think small pieces of live rock will convert much NO3 to nitrogen but a larger piece of live rock might work better in a canister.
 
IME/O the "bad" thing about canister filters is that they are out of sight (and all buttoned up ) and ,therefore, out of mind as the saying goes. They also , for the most part, don't have the gas exchange capabilities of other types of filters. In most reef style tanks extra bio capabilities ( nitrification) are not needed. So in those cases if a canister is used as a mechanical/chemical filter and is serviced regularly it poses no problem. In the case of nanos where the possibilities of exceeding a tanks bio filtration ( nitrification) capabilities run higher ,the extra bio filtration ( nitrification) may prove helpful and the best way to do this is to pack it full of bio media. Though, as DS stated, nitrification without denitrification would just lead to high levels of nitrate and if the tank needs the extra bio media to aid in nitrification it more 'n likely lacks sufficient denitrification potential as well and the bio medias available coupled with the flow rates of canister filters are not going to provide any. I also don't see the rock you used at the sizes you used helping with denitrification either. However, the coupling of the canister to your nano gives water movement with a clean look and it also increases the water volume ( a conventional closed loop would not accomplish this as much) which aids in system stability. A sump would have done the same but the canister doesn't have the issues with noise, evaporation, and flooding (your auto top off poses a flooding potential) that a sump can have. It provides a nice refugium with or without the algae. Being sealed up it can be a problem if you experience a prolonged power outage. IMO getting one large piece of live rock to take the place of all the rubble would give you a better "mouse trap" and it would be easier to service the filter. But, hey, if it ain't broke......

All in all it looks very nice.
 
first of all i got to say the garbage truck analogy thing confused the heck out of me, lol but anyways. i love the LR debate going on here, seems pretty heated.
first thing i would just like to know is how much is ur flow through the canister ninja? secondly on ur explanation on how to put together a set up like yours i was really wondering how you stop the water from flooding your canister when you turn it off and open it, shut off valves on the return lines?
my other questions are really for dragon slayer cuz i just need some clarification on what hes suggesting. first off i just like to know if the "no oxygen zone" you described that blueish center in the middle of the rock i saw when i cracked open a peice of my LR? secondly i thought you could only produce nitrate, if there was nitrite, and nitrite needs ammonia. so the LR in the filter will quickly turn the ammonia into no3, a less deadly type of nitrogen. third, your coil thingy you described.... where exactly is the "no oxygen zone" in the tube for the Anaerobic bacteria to grow??
 
Just dave,

As for the topoff being a flooding potential, I used a laboratory grade diaphragm pump like this one :

070312008.jpg


It is rated for pressure applications up to 110psi! Nothing is gauranteed but, I still wasn't worried about back-flow through the pump. It was more likely that a filter hose would burst or a seam in my tank give out before anything forced water through the piston of the pump.

- Chad
 
BCreefmaker,

I have only ever used Eheim canisters on my nanos so I don't know how the other ones work. All I did was just off the pump and flip a swtich on the hose coupler - this action also closes ball valves in each of the hoses. After that, I just pop the four latches and lift the top off the canister. I takeout the media baskets and dump the water in the canister down the drain, then fill it with new water. Then close everything up again and that was my water change.

- Chad
 
BCreefmaker,
And I'm sorry about the garbage truck analogy - I could see right away that it was tough to understand. :eek:
I was just trying to explain that NO3 cannont be created from thin air - it must be converted from raw waste (just like the garbage trucks do not 'create' the garbage.)
I can't see the addition of LR in an established system increasing the nitrates... the only way that could happen is if you had more waste than the current mass of LR could process. If that's the case - then it is a dang good thing that you did add the LR because nitrates are a heck of a lot better than unprocessed amonia.
I was just trying to say that reducing the amount of LR (or LR rubble) isn't an option for reducing nitrates - just like reducing the number of garbage trucks isn't an option for reducing landfill waste. The garbage isn't going to dissapear just because you don't process/convert it - it's going to pile up somewhere! If you have the same of waste in your system and you reduce the amount of LR, just because the LR is converting it to nitrates, you are going to have bigger problems on your hands...

- Chad
 
Summary for anyone who is scratching their head

A cannister filter will be less of an eyesore in a nano tank
>True

A cannister filter will allow for more water volume in the system - that's a good thing in terms of stability and water quality.
>True

A cannister filter will allow more room for LR.
>True

LR is a vital component of water quality.
>True. No one will argue that LR is not a vital component of water quality. But, there but there is a difference between how LR functions sitting in a tank compared to pieces of rubble in a cannister. I think this is what dragon-slayer is trying to explain.

LR lowers nitrate levels
>True, if it is in a tank where there can be lower flow through deeper areas of the rock where anaerobic bacteria is present to break down nitrates. Small pieces LR rubble in a cannister filter will function the same as bioballs or other biomedia. In other words, it will convert ammonia and nitrite but will not be able to convert nitrate due to the lack of anaerobic bacteria.

A cannister filter, properly set up and maintained, will not produce nitrates - it will reduce nitrates.
>See above.
 
Used canister filter (Fluval 404) for a 90g tank with high bioload.
Canister was fed by raw water, that passed inside the filter through filter foam, filter floss to the 2 baskets of Matrix biomedia, with phosphate remover in the last basket.

It accumulated a lot of debris and had to be cleaned once in 3 days.

It would be much better not to use it as a filter, but supply it by already filtered water from the sump. If it would be possible to modify the canister filter's pump for a low flow and use DeNitrate (or PondMatrix in case of higher flow), it could be better for denitrification. Didn't tried myself, though.
 
Has anyone seen a discussion on the rates of nitrification vs. denitrification? Just curious.
I would still think this system would have both processes because the rubble is nitrifying the waste and the LR on display would be doing both. If the LR can denitrify the waste why wouldn't this method work? Again just curious.
 
I think Siporax in this scenario definitely provides the most and best method to increase surface area in such a small area. Other than that... ninjafish, have you ever considered a DSB in any of your nano configurations? I think a configuration exactly like yours with like a DSB of about 5" might work well. Can someone confirm this or would the dsb be too small to do much work? What about a thick rubble substrate for a cryptic zone?
 
I don't know if it would work or not - I have heard that DSBs need to be larger with really great diversity in order to run properly.
I am not a big fan of DSBs - or even sand in general - I know that they have benefits with denitrification... I have just smelled too many sandbeds to be comfortable with the idea :eek2:

- Chad
 
Oh gotcha... good point.
On the two gallon, I finally settled on a rate of 3/4 of a milliliter of water every three minutes - this was the rate of evaporation in real-time. I think I was also lucky because it was in a climate controlled office - only every month or so did I have to make a slight correction to the water level - either up or down depending on if the month had been drier or more humid than normal. It sure made maintence a lot easier. The longest I ever left the tank was for 14 days when I went on vacation. I did a water change before I left and filled up the topoff bucket - when I got back, I just had to clean the film off the glass. Not bad for a 2gal tank.

- Chad
 
A small tube that went through the bottom to just above the water level connected to the top off reservoir would act as a safety should an overfill occur. It could be hidden by attaching small rock to it.
 
i have been using a rena xp2 canister filter just like ninjafish (minus light and cheato) for over a year on a 2gal and 6gal and i feel that it perfroms greater than any filter media. the added water volume is a plus in our nano tanks.
 
Thanks rick! That's good to hear from someone who has actually tried it.
Do you happen to have threads and pictures of your setups? (I never seem to have any luck with the search function here).

- Chad
 
Back
Top