110galreef
New member
I really like the look I had of my Phoenix 14k's on the Lumatek select a watt ballast. On the 250w or HQI setting to the it really was about the same look.
Based on tests from Sanjay site...
The 250w DE Phoenix 14k on and electronic balast was 73ppfd shielded and 88ppfd M80 HQI ballast So on HQI i'd probably be netting about 78ppfd as the HQI setting on the Lumatek only runs these bulbs at about 293w not the normal 315w of an M80 HQI ballast....
So I am wanting to get a higher PAR bulb as well as maybe a touch more blue or better flourencence.
400w SE XM 20k on electronic or HQI seems to have 99ppfd.....
400w SE Radium 20K on HQI shows around 123-147ppfd..
So going to the 400w XM20k, I go from 78ppfd to 99ppfd
and going to the Radium, I go from 78ppfd to ~130ppfd...
Am i going to really see better color, brighter tank, more growth and have better PAR?
Or just more heat electricity use? Is going from 78ppfd to 99ppfd a lot?
Based on tests from Sanjay site...
The 250w DE Phoenix 14k on and electronic balast was 73ppfd shielded and 88ppfd M80 HQI ballast So on HQI i'd probably be netting about 78ppfd as the HQI setting on the Lumatek only runs these bulbs at about 293w not the normal 315w of an M80 HQI ballast....
So I am wanting to get a higher PAR bulb as well as maybe a touch more blue or better flourencence.
400w SE XM 20k on electronic or HQI seems to have 99ppfd.....
400w SE Radium 20K on HQI shows around 123-147ppfd..
So going to the 400w XM20k, I go from 78ppfd to 99ppfd
and going to the Radium, I go from 78ppfd to ~130ppfd...
Am i going to really see better color, brighter tank, more growth and have better PAR?
Or just more heat electricity use? Is going from 78ppfd to 99ppfd a lot?