mhucasey
Acros & wieners, oh my!
Yeah, I read that study a while back, and while its better than most studies as far as trying to equalize differences, its obvious that the corals were not thriving in the sterile setups that they provided. Anything higher PAR-wise was probably damaging the corals.On the subject of lighting, I stumbled on this old article from 2008.
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2008/3/aafeature1
I will quote what caught my attention, and I wonder if it's accurate.
With this arrangement, the tank temperature fluctuated from 76 oF (lights off) to 80 oF (lights on) over the course of 24 hours; the irradiation period lasted 8 hours/day. The height of each of the lights was adjusted to provide a constant amount of PAR at the coral level, measured by an Apogee Quantum Meter; the initial height settings of the lights delivered about 140 - 160 mE/m2 of light intensity, but unsatisfactory coloration in this nutrient poor environment prompted the elevation of these bulbs so that the PAR readings at the corals were about 80 - 100 mE/m2. These readings were taken at the center of the tanks, directly under the MH or T5 bulbs. Therefore, not every coral received the same amount of light, as the intensity drops off as distance from the center increases. Nevertheless, identical placement of each type of coral in the three tanks ensured, at the very least, that the light intensity for each type of coral was approximately equal between the two MH tanks, with some uncertainty in the amount of intensity variance between the MH tanks and the T5 tank. Note that this approach normalizes the PPFD, in contrast to the Schlacher experiment. The corals were grown under these conditions for 14 months. All bulbs were replaced after 12 months of continuous use. The experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 1.
The corals colored up and grew at appreciable rates under this experimental regimen.
80 to 100 PAR?? Did I read that correctly? IS PAR mE/m2 or is there a conversion?
After 14 months that should have had thriving mini-colonies, not the small nubs that they show. If I was setting up such a study I'd use a single system sump distributed to three tanks and I wouldn't rely on so much phosphate remover.