Minimum Tank Size for These Fish?

Packersfan21

New member
What is the minimum tank size for each of these individual fish and what tank size would be needed to hold all of them?

1. Pacific pearlscale Butterflyfish
2. harlequin tuskfish
3. marine betta
4. bi-color foxface
5. Flame angel
6. fuzzy dwarf lionfish
7. longnose hawkfish
 
Re: Minimum Tank Size for These Fish?

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12839301#post12839301 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Packersfan21
What is the minimum tank size for each of these individual fish and what tank size would be needed to hold all of them?

1. Pacific pearlscale Butterflyfish (75)
2. harlequin tuskfish ( 90)
3. marine betta (75)
4. bi-color foxface (90)
5. Flame angel ( 40)
6. fuzzy dwarf lionfish (30)
7. longnose hawkfish (30)

I wouldn't consider much less than a 125 for all of them. JMO
 
I agree that the foxface and tusk will be too big and/or active for the 75, especially with the other fish.
 
Thanks for the replies. I guess I'll have to cut two of my favorites from the list... Do you think it will be ok if I replace the foxface w/ a kole tang and maybe add a second butterflyfish instead of the tuskfish?
 
if this is still your list for the 75:

1. Pacific pearlscale Butterflyfish
2. harlequin tuskfish - delete
3. marine betta
4. bi-color foxface - delete
5. Flame angel
6. fuzzy dwarf lionfish
7. longnose hawkfish

Honestly, I think you are pretty full up with 5 decent sized fish. You might have room for one more fish about the size of the flame angel.
 
It might work with a kole... It's hard to tell how fish will react to each other since there are always differences in behavior. Since the lion, hawk, and betta are not going to be taking up much swimming space, a kole might work if you stay on top of water quality. It could be challenging since that's a lot of fish for a 75g, but if you're determined to make it work, it could work as far as swimming space is concerned.
 
Back
Top