TeraHz,
you should have bought the 7660A. This accepts up to 12V. The clean 7660 goes only up to 10V max input.
Yep, that's ok, I'm using a 9V psu for now, I was just pointing out that the spec'ed part goes up to 10V.you should have bought the 7660A. This accepts up to 12V. The clean 7660 goes only up to 10V max input.
C31 is there. The problem initially was C30 (0.1uf) being in between C31 (10uF polarized) and pin 5 I believe. DWZM probably put it there by mistake because it is not in the datasheet nor the schematic I have for the PH board.the reason you get only -2.8V is because you are missing a capacitor on the negative output. Place a 10uf capacitor with its minus on pin 5 and you will get what you want.
Yep, I think that's factored. I checked the chip itself with two caps as per the datasheet and it works excellent when it is not in a circuit. I think removing C30 fixed some of the issue. It started outputting -4.5V still not the -9 it is supposed to.PS. Make sure you have the capacitors correctly installed on the negative side and mind that 7905 has a different pin config than 7805.
After the 7660 was was fixed, now the entire board draws about 220mA. Most of it from the Ethernet chip. Without it, I believe it is at about 60mA. It is very likely something is wrong in that area to cause that much current, but hey that's why it is prototyping phaseSomething is wrong. Your pH board draws way to much. My whole Mega with 2 analog and 16 digital pins + ORP circuit + LCD goes around 400 mA !
My fault! I meant to spec the 7660A but it clearly slipped my mind.
In the meantime we should be OK with 9v supplies. . .
Yes, that is the entire board. The ENC is really driving it up. PH circuit is very low current when it worksterahz - the current draw you're quoting - is that with the ENTIRE board populated? If so, the ENC chip must be very hungry. I have everything but the ENC and the pH section and I'm only drawing like 60 mA.
Hot iron and braid to get most of the solder off, plus a solder sucker for getting it out of annoying through-holes that get clogged up.
Often you have to decide if you want to save the board or the part. The trickiest situations are where you want to save BOTH. For instance, getting your old header off, you can use wire clippers to cut the plastic between each of those six pins, then pull them off one by one. The header is ruined but the board should be fine.
Modern Device sells bare RBBB PCBs for a few bucks if you want to swap things. Luckily the 328 is socketed so it pops out and moves over. Worst case, you can replace the rest of the parts (the few caps and resistors) on the board for maybe a buck or two, so it's no big deal to "rebuild" one of them.
Or, if you really ruined the pads for that header and you want to be super-economical, you could just wire your FTDI breakout board to the correct pins on the device itself (reset, rx, tx, 5v, GND). The header is just a convenience to bring those pins next to each other, there's no special magic.
Hold the presses! I think the outline for the 7905 is backwards. This is the datasheet for the part I spec'd:
http://61.222.192.61/mccsemi/up_pdf/MC79L05BP(TO-92).pdf
The diagram showing pinout for the TO-92 case is pretty arbitrary, it's hard to tell the orientation of the device (are we looking at the bottom or the top?)
Now look at this, which is the pin-compatible reg from Fairchild:
http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/LM/LM79L05A.pdf
Or this, from ST:
http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/2511.pdf
Pin 1 is clearly identified in these two datasheets with respect to the flat side of the case, and is OPPOSITE how I positioned it on the circuit.
I think you have it correct though
On the PCB.You think I have it correct on the PCB, or correct in my quote above?
From memory: the GND row of pins and the GND pad of the 7805.Which GND points were you measuring a 7v difference across?
On the PCB.