My 1165 Gallon in-wall Display Tank project

Ya I picked up on it. Not knowing the owner well enough didn't want to mention but I laughed like crazy when I first saw !!1
 
what the heck? so many things they don't sell and they have that? And why 110g? Why not 160g or 200g to match salt buckets? Seems like a horrid waste of money to me.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10808186#post10808186 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jnarowe
what the heck? so many things they don't sell and they have that? And why 110g? Why not 160g or 200g to match salt buckets? Seems like a horrid waste of money to me.
Click to expand...

I also thought it was kinda odd to see there considering the level of dry goods they tend to carry.

And it seems quite over priced vs. a container & circulation pump. I have no problem spending money for quality, but I hate wasting it too.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10808186#post10808186 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jnarowe
what the heck? so many things they don't sell and they have that? And why 110g? Why not 160g or 200g to match salt buckets? Seems like a horrid waste of money to me.
Click to expand...
I second Jonathans thoughts. I just purchased 2 160 gallon vertical tanks for the very reason Jonathan mentioned. Tanks were $165. each plus shipping.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10727083#post10727083 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Teremei
I know you already made your descision. But man, with a tank that size, you should go for a 3 sided tank so you can view everything from each side.

I mean there will be alot of fish in the back not visible alot of the time. I guess you could really have a nice open landscape with rocks along the edges and corners and some islands in the middle and that could help quite alot.
Click to expand...

I would love to but unfortunately the area allotted for the tank combined with the size of it won't allow for it. It will be a very open aquascape with a lot of diversity.

However, having all of the livestock (at least the mobile members) not visible all the time is a plus IMO. It will keep things interesting and offer a lot of surprises for infrequent viewers of the tank.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10727146#post10727146 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by skriz
You are in for an adventure! My tank has the same viewable pane as yours! 120" x 35"

Lighting that beast is going to be something! I would think MH is the best bang for your buck. Solaris would be insanely expensive to cover 66 x 120! With mh you can go with a mixture of 250w, 400w, & even 1000W. You don't have to have even lighting all over the tank. You probably want lower light around the areas that you can't really see anyway, right? If you are going to do a mixed reef, you can have areas of low light corals and areas of high light corals. This will save on energy and ballast cost.

Have you thought about how you are going to suspend the lighting? You'll have to have it so they can move out of the way to give you access inside the tank.

My 2 cents on the pumps. I am using sequence hammerheads (2) in my tank, which is located in the living room. They are dead silent! I can't even tell that they are on. So, I wouldn't waste your cash on the RD. Like bebo said, their main benefit is the sound.
Click to expand...

Thanks Skriz. It is going to be quite a long and slow project :)

I have pretty much decided on the MH vs. the Solaris. As much as I enjoy the technology behind the Solaris on my 120 I like the look of the MH a lot better (there I said it).

The lighting will be built so that it can be moved completely away from the tank for maintenance.
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10727294#post10727294 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jnarowe
I use 1000W Ushio 20+K lamps on my 35" inch deep tank and my corals love them. I also use a Hammerhead for my return and I can't hear it at all.

As far as 3 sides go, I don't buy into that. I had really wanted a 4-sided island tank or three viewable sides, but the fact is in-wall installations are just so much more practical, and as the "owner", I can see all 4 sides any time I want! :lol:
Click to expand...

I have a feeling I'll be seeing the 3 least desirable sides all too often :)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10727490#post10727490 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by CaptiveReefer03
If its okay that I drop my 2 cents in ,

If your going 66" front to back how are you cleaning the system up front? Acrylic is a great idea as my new system is built out of it but watch for thickness, that much weight is going to require some thick and i do mean thick acrylic! if your looking for black acrylic use a thin sheet and have them glue it in on the sides that your wanting its cheeper but still has the same appeal. Who ever you decide on your manufacture, tell them you want it glued solid and then it wont have a tendency to pull away in a few years after use if you end up geting a hairline crack and end up with salt creep down in between. Anyways another Idea is reconsider your viewing sides, its a shame to waste such a wonderful system only to have it viewable on one side. If your droping the dime then be able to enjoy it from multiple angles so that you can get the full effect of the tank in its entirety. Look at my system: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1166748 , and see if it gives you any ideas? I realize its smaller, and Trust me I wish I had the room for somthing as large as yours but either way enjoy!

Best regards,
Charles-
Click to expand...

Charles, I've seen your thread a few times and read it in detail. Nice build you have going there.

I have really decided on Glass as I've even managed to scratch glass in the past and with maintenance not being one of my favorite aspects of reef keeping (is it anyone's?) I'm sure I'll wind up rushing things here and there and having a mess of a tank in a year or two if I go with acrylic.

As of now there will be no front access. The lighting will be movable so I can lay over the top of the tank on a catwalk type system to get to the front.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10733125#post10733125 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ctenophore
Here are a few thoughts to consider re: glass vs. acrylic. I have experience with large tanks of each type, and I have to say glass is the way to go. Keeping 30 square feet of acrylic coralline-free will be a full time job. I couldn't keep my 7'x30" front clean without hours of scrubbing. On the plus side, working a magnet made for 1" acrylic for an hour is an excellent cardio workout.

With that tank width and depth, you will be getting in it to do maintenance. My friend has a 10x4x30" (~700gal) and he has to get in. His is laminated starphire, 1" all around. Watching him clean his glass in 15 minutes with a razor magnet made up my mind to go glass on my new tank. Moving it was challenging, but we have some great pics to prove it can be done.

Another friend of mine has a 1000gal concrete tank, with two sides 1" laminated starphire. Every time I went to his house, his glass was spotless. His tank is 8x4x5, which also requires mask & snorkel ownership.

My new project is a 5.5x4x4 fiberglass tank with a wood & foam core and 1" laminated starphire front pane. It is fairly light considering the size, and very durable as well. I will start a thread once I get the glass installed and the system going.

I think acrylic is great for large fish-only tanks, but not for high light & alkalinity sps reefs. The coralline will kill you, unless you contract that work out to a maintenance company or something.

Good luck with your project.
Justin
Click to expand...

Thanks for the insight Justin. It was a help in pushing me to go with glass :)

Now just to decide on a builder.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10741324#post10741324 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ekovalsky
I'm very happy with my AGE tank. Their pricing is very good considering the quality. You only need starphire glass on the front panel which will help with the cost. AGE built a metal stand for my tank at a very reasonable price, probably cheaper than I could have sourced it locally.

You may want to consider using a light mover (like the Gualala) considering how much area you need to illuminate. You could probably get by with half the number of 400w MH you would otherwise need and your corals will be getting illuminated from different angles during the day, similar to nature. The Sfiligoi modular MH/T5 lighting units are very nice too.
Click to expand...

I'm in contact with AGE as I love the routed PVC bottom concept. Just waiting on a quote from one of their dealers.

I don't really like the light mover concept too much. Lighting should be finalized just as the tank order is completed as the two are tied together pretty tightly.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10788237#post10788237 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by billyr98
you keep buying equipment at this size, you might need the entire basement :)
Click to expand...

LOL, one day :)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10788606#post10788606 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jnarowe
hey, what are the dimensions of the SCH? Any idea if they sell them as a separate option?
Click to expand...

I'll have to measure it for you. The brushes would need to hit the inside of the top of the chamber properly for it to work so I doubt it would work well on a skimmer it wasn't specifically made for.

They make them for the AP702 up to the AP1006 so there are a # of sizes. What skimmer are you looking to put it on?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10797522#post10797522 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SERVO
Wow this is going to be great! I also saw both your skimmer and Ca reactor and wondered where they were going!

This thing is going to be a monster! Too bad you didn't win that Marco Rock assembled center piece (or did you:mixed: ). That thing would look great in your system!
Click to expand...

I didn't get the assembled piece but I did win the 50lbs of Fiji :)

I have bought his rocks before and love them. They will be the majority of what goes into the large tank for sure.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10808983#post10808983 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Albright
I'll have to measure it for you. The brushes would need to hit the inside of the top of the chamber properly for it to work so I doubt it would work well on a skimmer it wasn't specifically made for.

They make them for the AP702 up to the AP1006 so there are a # of sizes. What skimmer are you looking to put it on?
Click to expand...

Yeah that's a good point. I want to put one on my DIY skimmer, but obviously mine is significantly deeper than the Deltec. I guess I'll drop that pipe dream and build my own or maybe install a wet neck.
 
I think you would be better off with just a big bucket. I got a 105 gallon poly tank from tank-depot.com for $200 shipped. I bet you could get a large enough tank for a 50% water change for less than $500,plumb it and throw a Dart on there and still be under 1k, although you don't get a free bucket of salt.....:D

http://www.tank-depot.com/productdetails.aspx?part=A-VT0625-64

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/58279226@N00/1438134275/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1029/1438134275_addabcee8e.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="DSCN0537" /></a>
 
Hey Albright I hope you don't mine me tagging along your thread!! Maan this tank is going to be a beast, especialy with all the expensive equipment you have gotten so far and I know there is more to come.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
New build
Replies
3
Views
327
griss
griss
Brian60077
Big project starting today......
Replies
7
Views
203
Dustin07
D
Z
Old Elos 70 - how to raise water level and reduce water noise?
Replies
9
Views
264
discotu
discotu
S
Sump at Same Level as DT
Replies
9
Views
162
wvned
wvned
cilyjr
Cilyjr 320 gallon on the central coast
Replies
12
Views
560
rogerwilco357
rogerwilco357
Back
Top