Stolireef
Active member
About two weeks ago, I decided that I was going to remove the 100 micron filter sock to increase nutrients in my 110 SPS dominant tank.
Well, after much consideration and the loss of three of my favorite sps corals, the verdict is that, at least for me, the filter sock removes something that the SPS doesn't like. LPS such as torch, hammer and acan look better than ever. But, no way at the expense of my SPS.
I was out of town this week but noticed things were a bit unhappy before I left. That said, I figured it was a function of a change in parameters and decided to give it one more week.
Tank info is 110 SPS dominant running a fuge, RO Skimmer, 2x250W DE 20K Ushios, 2x54W T5 actinics. Prior to making the change, my water would be considered low nutrient with unmeasurable nitrates and phosphates. I'm too irritated now to retest but will do so in the morning before the water change.
Oh well. Stick with what works I guess is the lesson I've learned.
Well, after much consideration and the loss of three of my favorite sps corals, the verdict is that, at least for me, the filter sock removes something that the SPS doesn't like. LPS such as torch, hammer and acan look better than ever. But, no way at the expense of my SPS.
I was out of town this week but noticed things were a bit unhappy before I left. That said, I figured it was a function of a change in parameters and decided to give it one more week.
Tank info is 110 SPS dominant running a fuge, RO Skimmer, 2x250W DE 20K Ushios, 2x54W T5 actinics. Prior to making the change, my water would be considered low nutrient with unmeasurable nitrates and phosphates. I'm too irritated now to retest but will do so in the morning before the water change.
Oh well. Stick with what works I guess is the lesson I've learned.