garvondavis14
New member
so why didn't you show us your 125 tonight instead?
My new(3 months old) 24G NANO CUBE! What do you think peeps?
- Thread starter Kennyboy1984
- Start date
- Status
Kennyboy1984
Member
In time. I am not talking about months either. I might not even post it in this particular forum. This is a place where people can showcase their nano tanks without being insulted. As soon as I posted my tank I was attacked! And accused of not even having a bigger tank right off the bat. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. I usually don't act like this guys but all of you have brought out my bad side.
garvondavis14
New member
You should expect to be attacked when you post something that moronic. This is a forum to help better our hobby, not post idiotic things...imagine when a n00b sees your tank and thinks, "hmm...I think those fish look good, I'll put them in my Nano-Cube". Yeah, it's a pretty (refrained from using expletive) horrible example to set, isn't it. Especially when they read the thread and find out YOU'RE like so many others who keep fish irresponsibly and create an imaginary tank that's "big enough" for them. Get off YOUR throne, Mr. Ebay, and just admit that you've done something stupid. Take the fish back and save the lives of two living things...just maybe someone will spare YOUR life someday when they have a chance to take it. Good luck Kenny.
Kennyboy1984
Member
What are you talking about? They are in absolutely no danger of dying. I DO ACKNOWLDGE TANGS NEED A BIGGER TANK! But they certainly wouldn't die if kept in a smaller one.
garvondavis14
New member
WOW
garvondavis14
New member
YES
THEY
WOULD
THEY
WOULD
Kennyboy1984
Member
DO YOU FEEL BAD THAT WE EAT TUNA???
Kennyboy1984
Member
Well they haven't died yet! Where's the proof???
garvondavis14
New member
NO
THIS ISN'T FOR FOOD, THERE IS NO REASON TO KEEP FISH UNRESPONSIBLY...WE WOULD DIE WITHOUT FOOD...WOULD YOU DIE WITHOUT HAVING TANGS IN A TINY TANK?
THIS ISN'T FOR FOOD, THERE IS NO REASON TO KEEP FISH UNRESPONSIBLY...WE WOULD DIE WITHOUT FOOD...WOULD YOU DIE WITHOUT HAVING TANGS IN A TINY TANK?
garvondavis14
New member
I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE CHECK ALL THE OTHER POSTS WHERE PEOPLE HAVE HAD DEATHS OF FISH THAT WEREN'T KEPT IN SUITABLE TANKS...I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU ARE IGNORANT ENOUGH TO THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE IT HASN'T HAPPENED TO YOU IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS, THAT IT WON'T OR CAN'T.
JUST
PLAIN
DUMB
JUST
PLAIN
DUMB
Kennyboy1984
Member
Would you say keeping any fish in an aquarium is irresponsible?
garvondavis14
New member
AND BY THE WAY, EVEN IF THEY DIDN'T DIE, WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU PUT THEM THROUGH THAT....THAT'S JUST HEARTLESS
garvondavis14
New member
LOL
garvondavis14
New member
It's irresponsible when you pay no attention the FACTS that you have surely read that have been researched over decades. You don't have a magic tank that is exempted from common sense. You don't have magic fish that don't need the same things as others like them. You don't have magic skills.
Why is it that when you point out when someone's wrong, they can't just listen and admit they are wrong? They always have to come up with excuses or reasons why their case is an exception.
Why is it that when you point out when someone's wrong, they can't just listen and admit they are wrong? They always have to come up with excuses or reasons why their case is an exception.
Pattylucylaura
New member
Dude just accept defeat or post the pics you either have it (which if you did you would have posted some pics by now) or you don't (which is what I am starting to belive with every stupid thing you say.) and just because you work at one of those sell it on ebay stores in your local strip mall doesn't make you an "Ebay" employee.
Oh and if you don't want to post it in the nano forum post it someplace else and link it in a thread it isn't rocket science. Although grammar is hard enough for you maybe linking a post would be as hard as taking a picture of the "tank".
Oh and if you don't want to post it in the nano forum post it someplace else and link it in a thread it isn't rocket science. Although grammar is hard enough for you maybe linking a post would be as hard as taking a picture of the "tank".
lovetoreef
New member
just plain sad 
albert7753
New member
All this came out of look at my new 24 gal nano. well hate to see the reactions of my 12 gal nano with 3 tangs in it . oh ah .....
In all fairness he can put anything he wants in his tank his money his misfortune.
Would I do it no, but even if he does or does not have a larger tank he dosen't have to post a pic or bring it to your house to prove anything to anybody.
In all fairness to him all that should have been said was hope you have a larger tank to watch your prize fish grow , and be done.
Oh, and back to the reason his was even started great looking nano.
In all fairness he can put anything he wants in his tank his money his misfortune.
Would I do it no, but even if he does or does not have a larger tank he dosen't have to post a pic or bring it to your house to prove anything to anybody.
In all fairness to him all that should have been said was hope you have a larger tank to watch your prize fish grow , and be done.
Oh, and back to the reason his was even started great looking nano.
billy_bob76114
New member
Im with Albert on this one.
maxcab
New member
I agree with garvondavis, being a "n00b" coming into your thread I thought your tank looked really cool (even though I know that tangs should NEVER be put in something this small, and would never try it) but what if a "n00b" just looked at the first few posts of yout thread and said "I like this tank, I'm going to do mine the same way" and later find out that they have made a HUGE mistake because they put 2 tangs and 6 other fish in a tank that size. This is the problem. And they don't have a 125 back up like you do... maybe, albert's right it is none of out buisness, keep on getting your kick out of this.
- Status
Similar threads
