jaeden
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8189508#post8189508 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by dandy7200
Running the setup you have described this is what I would do to use 2 valves and have it be effective and easy to tune:
Drain #2 would be the right side going to your fuge. This valve if you close it most of the way so your are getting like 100 gph through it to feed the fuge. Once you get the gph set leave it and pretty much never touch it again.
Drain #1 would be on the left side and this would flow close to around 400gph and be your main drain. This one you can tune with the valve to get the water level set.
I would use the 2nd hole in drain # 1 as the return.
I would use the 2nd hole in drain #2 as your backup.
The reasoning for this is that if you start to overflow out your emergency drain at a rapid rate not only will you hear the
crashing water in the normally quiet fuge but there will also be no bubble trap between this water and your return. Result = microbubble city in your tank and you will instantly have a visual clue as to something going wrong with your drains.
After using the setup for a while I have had small bits of water go to my emergency from time to time. The soud of the tank peeing alerts me and I know that it is time to give the valve a 1/8 turn open or clean my intake screen. I have used the full flow of the emergency one time when I put a bag in the tank to acclimate and it got sucked into my overflow and partially blocked the flow. When I saw it I pulled it away and immediatly at full force of 1000gph the tank "reset" the water level to where I had it tuned to. It was loud enough to scare the crap out of my unsuspecting guest. HTH
Very good , thanks Dandy I shall give it a whirl that's what I wasn't sure off whether or not I could have 2 overflows dialed in differently , like you were saying one drain at 100gph and the other at 400gph and not bother with the tee from one drain to another , I'll show pics once set up thanks again . one more note fluctuation in the sump = fluctuation in the overflow chamber solved by auto top off would this statement be correct. If this works I shall be abandoning the durso method I had originally planned .