JOSE CASAS
New member
Sounds like your current sys is dong just fine, but if you want something new i vote BK AND OZONE

Why use carcinogenic ozone when a cheap carbon filter will remove Gelbstoff and DOC's just fine?<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10634867#post10634867 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Kb-smoker
why not just use ozone?
I want to replace the clutter (ozone, carbon, algae) in my system with just a skimmer. It must be able to do the same thing, such as remove yellowing compounds.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10635165#post10635165 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by RoBolton
Why change!!!
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10633299#post10633299 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hahnmeister
Price no object, eh? Import an ATB Kegelpfannen skimmer...
http://www.aquariumtechnik.at/kegelabschaeumer.html
Currently, I have one skimmer (Tunze 9010) and one carbon media reactor (MRC FMC-415). I'd like to replace them with a better skimmer that can do both jobs: remove DOC's including Gelbstoff.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10635869#post10635869 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by 30reef
I don't think any skimmer will remove all of the yellowing agents in aquarium water, no matter how efficient it is.
Why not sell both of your current skimmers to help cover the cost of 1 larger and use the carbon still? That would eliminate at least 1 of the 2 skimmers you use now.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10635633#post10635633 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by shookbrad
Nice skimmer but nice price too $923!!!
Very true but the carbon media still needs periodic replacement and maintenance. If no skimmer can remove Gelbstoff, then what skimmers can produce the lowest DOC concentrations?<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10637334#post10637334 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Pyrrhus
The Deltec Turbo series has a chamber built into the skimmer for carbon etc. It wouldnt be entirely on its own, but it would fix your clutter situation and still achieve the stated goals.
Since freshwater skimmers are designed to skim DOC's that are more soluble in freshwater, Schuran who makes these skimmers must be on to something. Perhaps Schuran knows how to make saltwater skimmers skim "deeper."<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10639757#post10639757 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by marcrothschild
The data you are looking for would envolve a well designed study that would be quite costly to do correctly. I dont think any manufacturer out there has done anything even close to this, and most of the info on skimmer performance out there is subjective at best.
Hahnmeister speculated about the cleaning abilities of tall, low-air-turbulence skimmers in the "ati skimmer" thread (http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1183677). He offered the ER180 & ER250 as examples of such tall, low turbulence skimmers. He knew of no skimmer research though. Can you provide any links or sources for the information that "a tall countercurrent will produce the cleanest effluent."<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10640279#post10640279 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by manderx
a tall countercurrent will produce the cleanest effluent. biggest problem with them is they have to be huge for the amount of water you push through them, otherwise all that water flowing down against the bubbles causes too much turbulence which then defeats the whole idea of true countercurrent flow. bubbles start off clean at the bottom and are exposed to cleanish water. then as they rise, they get dirtier and dirtier, and are exposed to dirtier and dirtier water. this gives you the strongest ability to maintain a steep concentration gradient.