Nikon D60 vs. Canon XSi

I'm contemplating a step up from P&S cameras to a DSLR in order to get the pics I want and be able to have a camera that can grow with me as my experience grows over time and was wondering which of these cameras is more user friendly for a photographer "noob"? I just don't want to lay down $600+ and be overwhelmed and therefor regret my purchase and would like the camera that takes the best out-of-the-box pictures with minimal adjusting.
 
Keep in mind that the camera you already have works just fine, you just don't know how to use it. An Xsi would be a much "better" all around camera, but it is even more advanced and unless you are going to learn Shutter Speed, Aperture, ISO, and a few new ones...I don't think your going to be a happy camper. The camera you already have, the SX10 IS, does require a lot of adjusting, but with either of the cameras above adjusting and knowledge is the name of the game.
 
but would the camera I currently have be able to grow with me as my photography skills grow or would you recommend a DSLR for that? I understand I must learn the basics first but I'm talking long-term?
 
Long term, when you understand what all the buttons do and how/when to use them, the Xsi (with proper lenses) would be a far superior camera. Until you figure out how to use the camera your going to be no better off than you are now though.
 
Check out this post...http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1511237 ...this is what I wanted to be able to do. According to this guy he is an absolute "noob"...heck, he doesn't even know what the 18-55mm means on his lens yet he's able to get an awesome (in my opinion) shot like that right out of the box on "auto" setting...that's what frustrates the heck out of me! I fully realize that I need to learn the basics of photography before I take decent photos and am willing to do so as long as I see positive results but here this guy comes along, doesn't know a thing and takes a shot like this without really knowing anything about his camera. Also, I'm not going to be able to afford a new camera for a while after this so whatever I end up with now will have to last me for 5 or 6 years most likely that's why I contemplated the DSLR to begin with.
 
Set your camera to Tv mode, 15mm with 1/80 shutter speed, and you have what he used. I noticed you wife used the wide end, even going all the way out to 5mm on many of her posted shots. This is a huge reason why they look so much better.

I think that guy you mentioned took 100 shots and we are seeing his best. He has had the camera for one day. The bottom picture was his 49th shot and the top one was his 69th shot. This is fine as he is experimenting, but keep in mind he took about 100 pictures to show us those 2.

Now everything with moving parts will eventually break. Cameras have EXTREMELY fast moving parts, and his camera is only designed to take about 100,000 pictures before those parts break (this is considered to be very good). Your SX10 IS is a far cheaper camera and only designed to last about 50,000 shots before the shutter dies. It may die after 30,000...it may last till 70,000...but somewhere in that range should be expected. So taking 100 pictures a day to come up with 2 good ones isn't a good way to go. If you know a little bit about photography, you can take 100 pictures and have 2 you don't like. Or you can not learn about photography and take 100 pictures and have 2 you like. Not learning can be expensive, not to mention dull.
 
Last edited:
Wow a lot of professional photographers here, that's a guess but by their response they must be awfuly good!

If you choose a Nikon or Canon, both are solid choices and both can take great photo's. With DSLR's it's really the glass that makes the photo's and the body separate enity. Both Nikon and Canon have great lens and if you can afford their len's you will be happy. There are other players in the lens game, Tamron, Sigma etc .. they are good lens just not the best.

Ask yourself what you will use the camera for. Family, sports, reef, portraits, you get the idea, the broader your needs, will determine how many lens you will need.

The sensor is important, the larger it is the more you can do with the pictures after the fact. Canon mostly uses CMOS sensors and Nikon mostly uses CCD sensors, but I believe Nikon is now using CMOS and CCD in their camera's. The size of the sensor is like the size of the film, the bigger the more you can manipulate the end picture and the more the camera body will cost. Camera's with full size sensors start around $1300 body only. If you plan on using Photo Shop it can help you with the picture manipulating, but it also takes a while too master or even use really. There are other software's out there that are more simple to use.

Learning how to use your new camera can be fun or frustrating depending on your patient level. Personally I would not be overly concerned with the amount of photo's you can take before the camera breaks, most likley you won't go over the hypothetical number.

It's a lot of fun to use a DSLR camera and you are correct, start with the Auto feature and move on from there.

Good luck in your purchase.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13767151#post13767151 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by TitusvileSurfer
Notice that dtaylor123 is referring to the image sensor I was so passionate about in the other thread. Coincidence?

Taylor you should check out the sister thread of this one.
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1509051

I understand now. I should have figured it out earlier, my bad.

This is kinda cool if anyone is concern with sensor type:

http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp

Was I wrong or is Nikon starting to use CMOS sensors?
 
Back
Top