Definitely looks like a polyclad of some sort.
It’s just crazy. Everything was doing so, so well…even through the flucon treatment. Then, all of a sudden, everything starts dying one by one! If I didn’t know any better, I’d say someone poisoned my aquarium!Glad to hear about the Bryopsis. Sorry to hear about the other issues.
I dosed Flucon a couple days ago and am starting to see the small patch of Bryopsis thin out.
Honestly, it’s just been one disaster after the next, but with a few highlights sprinkled in. As I mentioned, I had an extended tank crash as a result of all of the bryopsis die off, coupled with the dead tang that I was unable to retrieve for three days (at least). Ammonia spiked, more corals died, and just kept the tank crash going like a slow motion train wreck. There was more die off than I care to admit…I even need to replenish my pod populations.How’s things going? My Bryopsis is gone now. No impact to the Caulerpa so far.
This new review on Humblefish indicates the Vabira sensor is very sensitive to positioning.The results are in…and there’s quite a bit to consider. The left side is the original light with cool white and Royal blue, totaling 36 LEDs. Each LED has 40 degree optics. I used the optics due to the 30” height of the tank. As a result, there are obvious “hot spots”.
The right side now has a good mix of colored LEDs, with far fewer “whites”, totaling 44 LEDs. I didn’t put any optics on the right side (yet).
By comparison, the right side has much better light spread with less shadowing. The left side has an obvious spotlight effect as a result of the optics, and the harsh white light looks a lot brighter.
I used a Vabira PAR meter to compare the two. The readings (just below water surface) jump around quite a bit on the left side due to the optics…as much as 850-900 to 350-300. The spotlight effect is not noticeable at the sandbed, with readings just above 100.
Interestingly, the right side gave me a bit of a surprise. The readings on the right side (no optics) are pretty consistent, no matter the location at any given depth…ie. The readings were very similar in the front, back, and middle of the tank. Just below the water surface, the readings were around 350. The sandbed readings were similar to the left side at just over 100.
I’m wondering if the Vabira is capable of giving accurate PAR measurements from the more blue/violet wavelengths based upon these results. Again, there are 20% more LEDs on the right, and they are presumably higher power, higher efficiency, and running at higher current. Even without the optics, I would have expected a little more in the way of PAR. I’ve got a funny feeling that adding a few more white LEDs would make the Vabira show a lot more PAR.
Any thoughts?
If nothing else, the correction factor works in my favor…I can definitely grow coral with the new lights and no optics. It is very interesting that the reading changes just by rotating the sensor (without regard to angle of incidence).This new review on Humblefish indicates the Vabira sensor is very sensitive to positioning.
Apogee 510 vs vabira VBR aqua PAR meters
It worked for sure. My unrelated tank crash forced me to do some water changes, so I may have to do it again, but it’s all good at the momentSo, the flucan worked for you too