dendronepthya
Premium Member
I just get the biggest kick out of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js7RzcdDcMs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js7RzcdDcMs
OT: Judge Joe Brown doesn't like the wedding photographer
- Thread starter dendronepthya
- Start date
Well, it's hard to tell the quality of the photos based on the crispness of the video, that said a paid professional photographer who doesn't have at least a 2.8 lens, or a newer body with outstanding high-ISO performance (7D, 5D, 1D) or preferably both is playing with fire. A 350D with a 5.6 lens will not take professional quality shots in a dimly lit church, period. I'd be nervous with my 7D with a 5.6 lens and I'm not afraid to go to ISO1600 with it, and would even consider 3200.
That's awesome. Who knew Judge Brown was a shutterbug. I guess the defendant didn't for one. I love that she doesn't even know what speed her lenses are, and I don't think she had any idea what he was talking about when he asked why they didn't have a 1 series camera. The sad part is, I think there are a lot of these hack photographers out there that are making business tough for legitimate wedding photographers, so I don't necessarily have a lot of sympathy for someone who hires a cut rate photographer and expects to get the same quality as a true professional.
Anyway, thanks for sharing that. I definitely had a good laugh.
Anyway, thanks for sharing that. I definitely had a good laugh.
the_rider
New member
Didn't know that Judge Joe Brown knew that much on photography
I like the part where he's asked about the diffused light and the "photographer" looked so confused lol The sad part is usually, customers doesn't know how to differenciate a real pro from a hack ... Some people uses download picture from real professionnal to advertive their work and it obviously seems so nice since it's done by a real pro but cannot deliver the same product obv.
xtm
Active member
That's what the bride gets for being cheap. Seriously, what does she expect for $1300? Weddings are very, VERY difficult event to shoot, and the fact that they're only charging $1300 should have been a red flag in the first place.
Also, The court session should have ended when she said "Wal-Mart". Wal-Mart for prints? Seriously? :lol:
The wedding photog's confrontational attitude didn't help either.
Also, The court session should have ended when she said "Wal-Mart". Wal-Mart for prints? Seriously? :lol:
The wedding photog's confrontational attitude didn't help either.
Wolverine
Premium Member
True. That was the case in ours as well. However, we had a photographer who knew how to deal with that. I would think that any pro would be able to.
my brother just got married a couple months ago, the photographers took over 3000 pics both with a Cannon and Nikon and did an outstanding job these people are hacks, I took better photos at my bro's wedding with my camera and in my brothers case flash photography was allowed in the church
Versus
New member
It has to do more with how the church is, I guess because its considered a holy/sacred place in some sense maybe?
But yeah even so the pictures taken were laughable. Those pictures look like something I would take lol.
I am wondering what portfolio pics this lady saw to even consider the crack head lol.
TitusvileSurfer
New member
Judge Joe Brown is a photographer!?
"Where is your 28-70? What happened to your 1 series?!"
"Evidently...we didn't have it." Bahahahaha
They were using an 18-55 and 70-300. WHAT?! Are you KIDDING me?!
"Where is your 28-70? What happened to your 1 series?!"
"Evidently...we didn't have it." Bahahahaha
They were using an 18-55 and 70-300. WHAT?! Are you KIDDING me?!
Similar threads
