Hmmm. glad to see a successful challenge to the cablevision monopoly.
Like LIPA, Cablevision has had a monopoly for far too long. They havent had any motivation to get better/cheaper in a long time. I could never understand how a utility, which is a permitted and encouraged monopoly, which has its prices regulated in order to ensure a profit, could make its owners multi-billionaires.
Nice gig if you can get it I guess.
While I'm on my soap-box, there is pending legislation right now regarding something known as "net-neutrality". What that is about is ensuring that the internet stays open access, and providers cannot block access to certain web services (websites that have opposing points of view, use high bandwidth, etc) or charge "tolls" to competing services (vonage, youtube, craigslist etc)
Imagine if you couldnt access this site because the owners refused to pay the toll. Imagine if vonage never caught on and was successful pushing prices down. Imagine if your provider refused access to sites which he disagreed with. Some are pushing to have that kind of power and they have very powerful lobbies.
Debate is going on now, so if youre interested, get involved.
Here's wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality