Please take a second to vote on how much flow your pellets get vs. their perceived and / or documented effectiveness. I realize this is a subjective poll, because every person could be using a different volume of pellets in a different reactor, with a different flow pattern, etc.
Hey Mikey - thanks for setting up this poll - should help a lot if it gets the participation. I would also like to see parameters listed so that we can dig deeper into understanding the system, as well as it's possible effects.
My Prototype system is as follows:
- 500G total volume converting from a fish only (under-maintained) system into a thriving reef;
- LPS softies and Montipora's added 3 months ago with Nitrates 160+ ppm; Phosphates 1.5 ppm
- used gfo to bring phosphates down to .5 before taking off line;
- after 3 mos. the nitrates are down to approx. 40-60ppm
- approx. 3L of pellets running for the last 2 weeks. Lower 1/3 of reactor is slow flow, upper 2/3 of reactor is moderate flow. Nitrates appear to be dropping slightingly faster with apparent reason to believe the system should drop to 20ppm within a couple of weeks;
- pH has been slightly low even though dkH seems to be reasonable - just started supplementing with Alk dosing (kent pro buffer);
SG - 1.025
pH - 7.9 - 8.1
(using Alk to up this toward 8.2 - 8.4)
dkH - 9
Ca - 500-520
(Calc reactor CO2 supply cut off for weeks. Just took entire system completely off line)
- NO3 - 40-60ppm
(down from approx. 200)
PO4 - 0.5
(down from 1.5-2 with the help of gfo)
For the record - I do suspect that the extra biomass present [as a result of the bp process] is effecting additional load on the pH buffering system... i.e. might have to maintain higher dkH to keep natural range above 8.2. I know that the recommendation for dkH with ULNS is to not exceed 9, but I'm still curious to observe these parameters.
Sheldon