It's an ecological disaster of global proportions, and an economic disaster for the Philippines - no reefs = no tourists = no income.
I think it affects more than just the Philippines. Dying coral reefs can and will affect the world.
It's an ecological disaster of global proportions, and an economic disaster for the Philippines - no reefs = no tourists = no income.
how often did mass bleaching occur in this region in the past?
I see another poster mentioned 1998 and 2002 from the article.
Is this something that happened in the past every so often only to have the corals
rebound time and time again?
The article is trying to be shocking, which it achieves, but is light on past events from 20+
years ago. How often did this happen 30, 50, or 100 years ago?
The first records of mass bleaching anywhere only date back to the late 70s and they have increased in frequency since then. Part of that increase is likely due to reporting bias- now that people are concerned about bleaching they're more likely to report events. However, the late 70s is well within the SCUBA era and well-within the modern period of reef studies, so there were plenty of people out there looking at the reefs who would have likely made note of something like this if it was happening. These types of events are extremely obvious, even from a boat at the surface, so it's unlikely that they were occurring as often as they are now and just going unreported. Also, the ecological changes occurring after some of these events suggests that at least on those specific reefs these types of events are unprecedented in recent history.The article is trying to be shocking, which it achieves, but is light on past events from 20+
years ago. How often did this happen 30, 50, or 100 years ago?
It is possible that no evidence of past bleaching exists because the reef recovered, and the bleached corals are now covered by new healthy growth. Quantifiable documentaion of weather, temp, etc. has only existed for a blink of the eye in the grand scheme of things. How can we as humans be certain that fluctuations in climate are unnatural or caused by humans? Certainly, combustion engines emit CO and CO2 exhaust (plant food), but there is also evidence of higher temperatures well before the industrial revolution. IMO, global warming and cooling is something that is cyclical, and will occur with or without human intervention. The reefs of the world have survived eons of temperature fluctuations, global warming and cooling events, ice ages, etc.. I imagine that they will be here long after we are all gone. No need to call Al Gore just yet...
Rossini,
I apologize if I have offended you in some way...this is a sensitive topic to many. I am well aware of greenhouse gases, and I do not get scientific information from fox news. My background makes me more than qualified to speak to these issues.
Do humans impact the global environment? Yes!
Does burning fossil fuels introduce greenhouse gases into the atmosphere? Yes!
IS climate (and consequently weather) in a constant state of flux? YES!
Is the ocean home to some of the oldest life forms on the planet? YES!
Have these organisms survived global climate changes in the past? YES!
Is a bleaching event tragic? Yes!
Will these bleached reefs recover??? Based on a few billion years of existence and evolution and temperature changes and chemistry changes and so on...YES!
Now, I will not question anyone on this forum about their so-called scientific sources. It is the duty of every one of us to find information on our own. Let's not get caught up in bickering over who's facts are more factual. All I'm saying is that oil spills, chemical pollutants, cyanide fishing, dynamite coral fragging, etc. etc. are doing more harm to the world's reefs than my F-150 ever will. One day, humans will be gone, temperatures and climate will still fluctuate, and Nemo will still live happily on his reef.
Clearly.My background makes me more than qualified to speak to these issues.
Clearly.
What is your background?My background actually does qualify me to speak to this.