which is the meaning of the word "maduration"?
is maduration possible without inorganic phosphorous (po4)?
How many people have suffered a dinoflagellates pest after using strong adsorbers (aluminium, GFO and so)?
My opinion is you must drive careful the po4 export or you can rise phytoplanktonic blooms of those elements who didnt need po4 and can thrive on organic matter and organic phosphorous.
Benefical bacteria and phyto need a minimal amount of po4.
If you go so far with po4 export another harmfull phyto like dinos will take the aquarium control.
IMO like m2434
is maduration possible without inorganic phosphorous (po4)?
How many people have suffered a dinoflagellates pest after using strong adsorbers (aluminium, GFO and so)?
My opinion is you must drive careful the po4 export or you can rise phytoplanktonic blooms of those elements who didnt need po4 and can thrive on organic matter and organic phosphorous.
Benefical bacteria and phyto need a minimal amount of po4.
If you go so far with po4 export another harmfull phyto like dinos will take the aquarium control.
IMO like m2434
I have actually been playing with this a bit. On my 20g, I ran the GFO from day 1. The issue I 've noticed is that, if I stop running GFO, the algae appears in force with a day or so.
My assumption was that the P did not increase that dramatically, all of a sudden when the GFO was removed. Instead, I believe, some micro-algae may demand more N and Fe than P. In this case, when running GFO, the N and Fe rise slightly, because P is limited and N and Fe are therefore not as readily consumed. Because, these algae do not require much P, the slight increase is sufficient for them to utilize the now increased N and Fe. (Note inorganic N was not detectable on a test kit, but I'm not using anything particularly accurate such as a photometer, I don't test for Fe and there could be another nutrient I'm not accounting for – I'm not implying N and Fe are the only limiting nutrients, they are just examples)
My thought was that maybe it's more beneficial to allow nutrients export in a more balanced ratio. So, a few weeks ago, I removed the GFO and did not replace it. It took a while, but the algae has essentially disappeared. So, other organisms and my cheato have likely taken over. So, I think my theory could be correct, but there are thousands of other possibilities (Of course leaching of phosphates from the rocks is another) and I'm curious to hear what others think. Is the algae occurrence due to an unbalanced nutrient ratio? Is it better to rely on other means of export such as cheato from day 1?
This is an interesting topic, I'm glad someone brought it up. Also, if there is a nutrient balance issue, I think this also ties into the question of how often and for what duration, should GFO be run under normal circumstances?
Last edited: