I'm in the conceptual planning stages of a new tank. It'll be dyi acrylic, measuring 48"L x 24"w x 20"h (100g). But 12" of the length will be sectioned off by a divider for the refugium so the actual display area is 36"L x 24"w x 20"h (75g). There will be no sump or return pump. The water will flow from the display area into the refugium via slots at the top of the divider, and returned by air lift. I may use some more airlifts in the refugium to increase internal flow in there. Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢m mostly going to house soft corals and clams in this tank, with a DSB. Besides the turbulance from the return airlifts, Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢d like to use a Stream as the only means of water flow in the display area. The questions that Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢m juggling:
1. Would the smallest controllable Stream (6010 kit?) be suffiecient for this? At its low flow settings, would it still be too much for the sand bed?
2. My cheaper option idea is to use the 6060 and glue another divider at its ouput, essentially sectioning the output into 8 or 12 sections instead of the 4 there now. The reason for this is that Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢m afraid the flow will be too stong as is for such a short tank. I remember reading that any blocking of the output would reduce the flow significantly, hence I would section off the sections into smaller sections to reduce the output. Do you think this will work? I know I would need to experiment with how much to section off further, but I just want to make sure that doing so wouldnââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t harm the pump.
3. Or another option would be to increase the height of the tankââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s walls to 24ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚Â, but leave the water level and refugium divider at the 20ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ mark. Then if I put the Stream high on the tank and leave it at the high output, would the wave it makes push the water over the divider into the refugium (that'd be quite cool)?
Since I havenââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t built the tank yet, thereââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s a bit of leeway in the dimensions of the tank if you feel changing any of the dimensions would make things work better.
1. Would the smallest controllable Stream (6010 kit?) be suffiecient for this? At its low flow settings, would it still be too much for the sand bed?
2. My cheaper option idea is to use the 6060 and glue another divider at its ouput, essentially sectioning the output into 8 or 12 sections instead of the 4 there now. The reason for this is that Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢m afraid the flow will be too stong as is for such a short tank. I remember reading that any blocking of the output would reduce the flow significantly, hence I would section off the sections into smaller sections to reduce the output. Do you think this will work? I know I would need to experiment with how much to section off further, but I just want to make sure that doing so wouldnââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t harm the pump.
3. Or another option would be to increase the height of the tankââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s walls to 24ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚Â, but leave the water level and refugium divider at the 20ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ mark. Then if I put the Stream high on the tank and leave it at the high output, would the wave it makes push the water over the divider into the refugium (that'd be quite cool)?
Since I havenââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t built the tank yet, thereââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s a bit of leeway in the dimensions of the tank if you feel changing any of the dimensions would make things work better.