purple bulbs - effects on corals, algae?

JPMagyar, you're correct. I was trying to educate, not slam. I don't know everything and never will, but nowadays I believe in using reputable sources and peer reviewed data instead of opinion and guesswork. I have too much to lose.

Dana Riddle has published several articles on AdvancedAquarist.com regarding coral coloration. I need to see if they add anything to the equation, but the biggest problem is that one spectrum does not satisfy all aquarium corals equally, since they come from a wide range of depths. Shallow water corals do a little better with a little more broad spectrum, while deeper water corals prefer blue/violet. That's why I compromise and prefer 20-25% white LED and the rest as a combination of 400-510nm.
 
JPMagyar, you're correct. I was trying to educate, not slam. I don't know everything and never will, but nowadays I believe in using reputable sources and peer reviewed data instead of opinion and guesswork. I have too much to lose.

Dana Riddle has published several articles on AdvancedAquarist.com regarding coral coloration. I need to see if they add anything to the equation, but the biggest problem is that one spectrum does not satisfy all aquarium corals equally, since they come from a wide range of depths. Shallow water corals do a little better with a little more broad spectrum, while deeper water corals prefer blue/violet. That's why I compromise and prefer 20-25% white LED and the rest as a combination of 400-510nm.



Hi Crit,

I was wondering if you would consider taking this debate to a new thread. I love a good online argument especially with folks that are willing to discuss "facts" without taking the posts personally. I feel we might have much to learn from each other, but I can tell you right now I strongly disagree with what you said above and would welcome a chance to discuss the topic in a new thread.

I would suggest a topic of: The latest debate on Coral Coloration, Growth and light wavelengths, but I'm open to any and all suggestions.


Your Reefin' Buddy,

Joe Peck



PS For purposes of this thread I will add that the first tank pictured above used KZ Fiji Purple lamps as part of it's mix as do I with no inherent algae problem.
 
Nevermind Dan,

I found your thread:

Spectrum, Intensity, Health and Aesthetics


and will gladly join the discussion there. I think we share the very same goal, but are taking very different lighting approaches and have come to some different conclusions so I look forward to reading through your thread tonight.


Cheers,

Joe
 
Meet you over there. Go ahead and post your point of view and supporting data. I've had numerous ongoing discussions with Dana Riddle on the subject, and have found scientific studies on the subject.

I have to run a bunch of errands today and will catch up to you.
 
Holy Old Posts Batman!

I wrote those responses before I read more intently into lighting.

Thanks for bringing up some great points!

Indeed, back then I did overestimate the value of Red (600+ nm) light as far as expecting more corals to use chlorophyll (and chlorophyll B).
Instead many corals rely upon other parts of the spectrum for photosynthesis "“ heavily weighted to the blue spectrum akin to how natural sunlight loses intensity and wavelengths as it is filtered at depths of the ocean.

More coral's will have lighting needs weighted toward the blue spectrum. HOWEVER, many many corals still use light right up to [and over] that 600nm mark [*1]
And for certain corals that have evolved to take advantage of higher light/chlorophyll (Yes some corals do still use chlorophyll A [*2]) you will not see full growth potential met unless you offer light over 600nm.

Again,
faviazoo.png


Not all corals need this light, and many can get by without it, but do not ignore the fact that many CAN use it"¦ and benefit greatly from the addition of this light.

It is also true, that an overabundance of "˜red' light [~650+ nm] can also lead to nuisance algae as well [*3] "“ this is why people steer others away from offering "œred" light [and why LED products like the Sol did so well commercially].

But go and put that chalice that's been sitting under a Sol under T5 (with 10k bulbs + Actinics) and you will see a vastly different coloration (I've seen it done at local LFS"¦).

Just because some corals don't use any "˜red' light, doesn't mean I should neglect the corals that do.

I find if your nutrients and other things are in check, you don't get a ridiculous spike in nuisance algae as some might suggest. <- My experience.

Crit21 "“ touché on point about LEDs and lenses, I mis-spoke as to the "˜lens' as the cause. My original point was that LED's have potential to offer most of the spectrum, but most LED's have a limited breadth of spectrum offered when in final product form (hence you're mixing and matching many different LED's to try to cover the "˜gaps' in spectrum inherent in simpler forms of this technology). IMO There are few LED products out there that did the research and offer good spectrums.

[quote="JPMagyar"] ReeferBatman I hope you are willing to take the criticism of your comments with the friendly intent it is given.[/quote]

Absolutely I'm always up for spirited discussion, if I didn't have them, I wouldn't expose myself to additional opinions and knowledge. :beer:

YOU DO NOT NEED 10000k lamps to "optimize" coral growth in a home reef.

True, you don't need any particular K of lamp, as long as you are still giving enough breadth of spectrum to meet corals needs. You can certainly make corals look pretty and sustain"¦ but don't neglect the fact that they COULD do better [their terms of energy production "“ not yours of looks pretty].

This is where the market gets misleading, as Kelvin is the overall appearance of the light, it doesn't neccesarily dictate the Par output. IE one 10k light can have a different par output than another 10k light.

They key here is "optimizing coral growth" for all coral types. It seems higly logical to me that optimal coral growth on an actual reef requires a broad spectrum of light, but it is most definitely NOT true with regards to the saltwater aquariums the vast majority

So we agree that to optimize corals growth "“ we must offer more of the spectrum than just blue.

However, your statement that most aquarists only want pretty tanks and are unconcerned with corals maximum potential - I find short-sighted.

[Paraphrased] Here's 2 pics from the internet of tanks, and here's ReeferBatmans
A) Nice grown out tanks with DSLR pics vs 6 month old frag tank with Cameraphone"¦ Not a hard challenge lol.
B) And you used my "˜full daylight' pic"¦ I have separate Blue fixtures for awesome night-time viewing. 
C) I can take pretty pictures too"¦
20121224165441.jpg

20121224163115.jpg

201212241632301.jpg


D) The great part about this hobby is we can each do our own thing"¦ I think the growth I have seen speaks for me. Here's my Prizm Favia less than 1 year ago and the other day"¦
[Actinics on 1 year ago]
011zk.jpg

[Daytime lights on few days ago]
20121224162908.jpg




Now to throw more craziness into the equation"¦ just as some corals do use 600+nm light"¦ some can use 300-400nm UV light as well 

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2217754&highlight=uv+light

This $heete be crazy!

Footnotes:
*1 = http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/7/aafeature1
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/6/aafeature2
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2009/1/aafeature1/
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/2/aafeature
*2 = http://www.biolbull.org/content/135/1/141.short
http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v191/p53-69/
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00227-002-0866-x
*3 = http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Chlorophyll_c
http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Chlorophyll_d

Have a good day!
:bounce3:
 
Last edited:
It also depends on the type of coral ie-a deep water coral vs. most corals found closer to the top of the spectrum thus the need for a 10k. And, THE BLACK LIGHT WILL EMIT UV RAYS, AND ULTIMATLEY HARM THE CORALS
 
I think all the comments about too much red being harmful are correct, however, I also think that especially when it comes to T5 lights, our eyes overestimate how much red is being contributed by the "Purple" bulbs. For example, the following tank, which is the KZ show tank and one of the best in the world in my opinion:
KZ-ZEOvit-FTS.jpg

Is lit with the following 24 tubes:
13 Coral Light New Generation
6 Super Blue
5 Fiji Purple
Thats a lot of white and purple light, yet it looks great.
Or perhaps Yano's beautiful reef detailed here on Reef Central:
IMG_2076_redimensionar_zps0ad7a761.jpg

It uses the following bulb combination:
-2 Kz Superblue
-2 Kz Fiji purple
-4 Kz New generation
-4 Kz Coral light
What does this tell us? Who the heck knows? It seems that for every heavily blue successful reef there is a equally impressive white/red one. Maybe it just comes down to personal taste when it comes to T5 bulbs.
 
Back
Top