reidcrandall
New member
I posted this in the chemistry forum too... but I am a nervous SOB...
I've got a 29g quarantine up and running right now with a 4" regal angel and a 1" juvenile majestic angel. I got an ammonia reading of .25 today, which alarmed me, so I have done two 50% water changes today, and am still getting a .25 reading. My test kit tests for ammonia and ammonium, so if I calculate correctly at 8.2 pH and 78 temp, the toxic level is 0.022. Any ammonia at all worries me, because these are two fairly delicate fish, and I don't want to have any long term health ramifications.
The system has been up and running for about 7 weeks with a marineland biowheel filter, ut 10-15 lbs live rock, spiked with Nite Out II and plenty of flow. The fish were added on Wednesday of this week.
i expected a bump in negative parameters with the increased bioload, but I am nervous that the biological filtration hasn't taken care of the ammonia more quickly.
Any suggestions?
I've got a 29g quarantine up and running right now with a 4" regal angel and a 1" juvenile majestic angel. I got an ammonia reading of .25 today, which alarmed me, so I have done two 50% water changes today, and am still getting a .25 reading. My test kit tests for ammonia and ammonium, so if I calculate correctly at 8.2 pH and 78 temp, the toxic level is 0.022. Any ammonia at all worries me, because these are two fairly delicate fish, and I don't want to have any long term health ramifications.
The system has been up and running for about 7 weeks with a marineland biowheel filter, ut 10-15 lbs live rock, spiked with Nite Out II and plenty of flow. The fish were added on Wednesday of this week.
i expected a bump in negative parameters with the increased bioload, but I am nervous that the biological filtration hasn't taken care of the ammonia more quickly.
Any suggestions?