Reefkeepers Tackling Global Warming

Status
Not open for further replies.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9135489#post9135489 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Sorry Hippie but that's just not worth a response, imo.
You won't respond because you never say anything worthwhile, it's just insults and links with you. Anybody with a computer can do that.

This is where we might find some people actually qualified to discuss climate science research. Although very quickly I think we'll see how unqualified we are in comparison. Science forums realclimate.org, sciforums.com , or thescienceforum.com.
And here we go again...We aren't qualified to discuss the issue. Go back to American Idol people, don't concern yourself with things you can't understand :rolleye1: Some of us actually have science backgrounds and reading (and understanding :eek1: ) scientific papers isn't so mysterious. Why do you insist on trying to bully people into accepting theories because they supposedly don't have the mental faculties to understand? What do you think our elected officials do? Do you think they go and get climatology degrees from Cornell before voting on legislation? Heck no, it's people like Mike :eek1: , and me :hmm4: .
 
I'm sorry Hippie, but I honestly don't see how you'd expect me to respond to that type of dialog. But I assure you that your interpretation of my perspective could not be less accurate.

CNN feature on tomorrow's UN report. link
 
Last edited:
All you have to say is "sorry, you people aren't dumb, and discussing a potential global disaster is good, even if you don't have climatology degrees". You might think my interpretation is inaccurate, but it's not just me.

Don't say things like:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9002217#post9002217 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
and, doesn't it make sense to let the best scientific minds on the planet figure out the predominant theory, ajd not a bunch of aquarium nerds like us? The best minds in the worldwide scientific community have declared climate chang eot be a plausable risk, so who are we to question them from our couches? Lets leave the climate science to the actual climatologists at Harvard and Cornell.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9004681#post9004681 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
2) Leave the real climate science to the real climatologists....don't be naive enough to believe some fish geeks on their computers have the answers that the best minds in the worldwide scientific community missed.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9006814#post9006814 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Professional climatologists are qualified, not reefgeeks, lol. What makes you think any of the armchair scientists here know anything that the entire worldwide scientific community missed?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9007098#post9007098 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Compared to professional climatologists, YES, we're all relatively 'stupid' here on that subject.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9130549#post9130549 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
I think you completely misunderstood my point, but that response may in fact support the one I was making.
---------------------------------------------

I'm guessing a climate scientist would chuckle at the feeble attempts of a few fish geeks to grasp the depth of the climatology field. If you all really want to ask someone qualified, then try using the links to the science forums I posted . It's also a quick way to realize how unqualified we are on the subject.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9134585#post9134585 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
MC my sarcasm was merely illustrating how absurd this would sound to an actual climate scientist

A few college-level reef geeks are so far from qualified on the subject it's comical.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9135489#post9135489 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
This is where we might find some people actually qualified to discuss climate science research. Although very quickly I think we'll see how unqualified we are in comparison.

If you don't understand how these comments might rub people the wrong way, then you need to have more contact with people to develop some social skills. Savvy?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9139157#post9139157 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
There's some places where you barely get the bait out of the can and the fish just start jumping into the boat it seems. Perhaps more amazing, is when they insist on doing it even when you're not fishing. :eek:

You truly are completely clueless. Have fun being an idiot.
 
(chuckle) :) indeed. This gets better by the minute. And s/he still doesn't even realize we agree. Priceless[insert MC commercial here]. Yaknow Hipp, if all your miguided hostility could be harnessed for electricity, we might solve the energy crisis right now. Where's the 'eating popcorn' smiley when i need it? Somebody hook it up.

Back on topic though, today's ABC news feature: link
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9143558#post9143558 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
(chuckle) :) indeed. This gets better by the minute. And s/he still doesn't even realize we agree. Priceless[insert MC commercial here]. Yaknow Hipp, if all your miguided hostility could be harnessed for electricity, we might solve the energy crisis right now. Where's the 'eating popcorn' smiley when i need it? Somebody hook it up.
We agree that GW is real, that isn't what annoys me. It annoys me that you're passive aggressive, insulting, arrogant, and don't even realize it.
smashfreakB.gif
 
if you say so...:) I still think if you really understood my posts your hostility would feel rather miguided.

An off-topic thread on some obscure forum for reef geeks is hardly worth the mountain of hostility you've poured into it. I almost feel like I'm watching you court a stomach ulcer. Seems axhausting, I can't imagine. Stress is a killer yaknow...

And as easy as it appears, your buttons really only get pushed if you choose to allow them to be pushed. A mother once said there's always going to be people in the world who rub you the wrong way, but how you react and let them affect you makes all the difference.

Suit yourself though, this was definitely more entertaining than Seinfeld reruns. cya.
 
Last edited:
ReefBuddha, this isn't off topic. This part of the forum is all about this sort of thing... "Reef Geeks" probably have some understanding/appreciation for nature/science so this isn't so far off of the path.

The discussion may have gone a little awry. With the amount of data each of us can counter arguments with we can discuss in this matter for another 1000 pages, easily.

I don't think the criticism should be that we can't understand this and that we can't piece it all together and that we can't do anything about it, rather it should be to note how difficult it is to make a holistic argument or case either for or against global warming and everything in between.

Discussions like this are important.

…but yeah, fruit loops might help us all... the internet isn't always such a great place for arguments. does "bye now" mean we've lost you from this irrelevant thread forever?



I don't have the energy to start any more arguments on here..
 
hehe, nope just sayin' bye to another.

I hear ya Ross, really. I'm not saying discussion is not important, and i'm sorry if it came across that way. I was encouraging discussion by creating threads on the subject. But i am trying to maintain a realistic perspective before everyone decides they are just as qualified on the topic as the climate scientists behind these UN reports.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9107982#post9107982 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha

Nobody is saying not to question. nobody is saying not to learn. But , imo, we should keep a grounded perspective in the fact that we are not actually climatologists...and we should realize that our opinions are baseless compared to the most learned professionals in the field.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry if I came off that way Hippie, and anyone else whom I may have offended. I obviously include myself in the 'reef geeks who are not remotely qualified to challenge UN reports' club :D, so naturally I'm not offended by the idea. Frankly I find it a bit odd that any reef geek would be ____ enough to think that they have answers that the best minds on the subject missed.

Which brings me to the reason behind my point. The reason I was drilling home the point about being unqualified, is that often there are some less, uh, 'aware' voices who casually claim that this science is a hoax, all hype, or something to that affect. I really didn't mean to suggest that all discussion is pointless, although I can see how it may have seemed that way. I certainly didn't mean to suggest that there was no value in the discussion that you guys were having, which was very informative. So again, I do apologize.
 
Last edited:
Hi everyone, been tagging along again. I'm glad to see that emotions settled down a bit although it's certainly understandable for people to get upset--the entire concept of GW is a frightening. And here's a compliment to all: I'm relieved to hear the emotional responses because at least you care enough to GET EMOTIONAL! :) But remember, don't kill the messenger :) Anyway, I have a basic question I would like feedback on: Let's pretend for a minute that GW isn't an issue. However, as a species, how can we possibly justify harming our planet to the point of death? If AIDS and world hunger do not kill everyone, a dead planet surely will.
 
What is a dead planet? Or do you mean one without humans? Do bacteria and insects exist? Or do you mean like the moon? No atmosphere and cold.

As for pretending Global Warming isn't a big issue, the latest from the UN says its inevitable and we can't stop it. So why not pretend its not an issue as we have no way to impact or change it.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9149383#post9149383 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by samtheman
What is a dead planet? Or do you mean one without humans? Do bacteria and insects exist? Or do you mean like the moon? No atmosphere and cold.

As for pretending Global Warming isn't a big issue, the latest from the UN says its inevitable and we can't stop it. So why not pretend its not an issue as we have no way to impact or change it.


We can't "stop" a lot of these things from happening, however we can affect to some degree their severity and direction... I think it's dangerous to think any differently.

Climate change acts steadily however in the past we do see times where rapid change occurs.. meaning there likely are "tipping points" if you will, at which the system can "flip" or change very drastically. To the point where we wouldn't even recognize it. So, reaching these threshold points may be inevitable, but I'm not convinced that humans can't affect how soon they are reached. The more prepared we are when this happens the better off we will be.
 
Regardless of climate change we can't forget the benefits of clean breathing air and healthy ecosystems, which we certainly do affect in a big way.
 
Although maybe not quite as stong, I do agree with Hippie in pinciple that people should get as deep of an understanding as they can with any issue the choose to advocate. I am tired of hearing the "catch phrases" being parroted back to me by people who have proxied their thinking. When someone says "A consensus of scientists" and I ask, "Name one?" they should be able to name at least one or the name of an organization at least.

Anyway, the reason I posted was to ask Hippie a question. You said that the US was a CO2 sink. I believe that it is due to the foilage right? I am curious why planting trees is not more predominantly mentioned as a way to reduce CO2. Any thoughts on this? Should it be? Would it work?

Mike
 
When someone says "A consensus of scientists" and I ask, "Name one?" they should be able to name at least one or the name of an organization at least.

(chuckle)Sounds meaningless, imo. Anyone can google a name, so be my guest. There are plenty of climate scientists from around the world backing the UN report. Just go to the sites for the UN, Harvard, Yale, Cornell, or Stanford etc. science departments and no doubt there's a list.:D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top