ReefBuddha
Member
tomorrow THE UN REPORT is released!
You won't respond because you never say anything worthwhile, it's just insults and links with you. Anybody with a computer can do that.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9135489#post9135489 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Sorry Hippie but that's just not worth a response, imo.
And here we go again...We aren't qualified to discuss the issue. Go back to American Idol people, don't concern yourself with things you can't understand :rolleye1: Some of us actually have science backgrounds and reading (and understanding :eek1: ) scientific papers isn't so mysterious. Why do you insist on trying to bully people into accepting theories because they supposedly don't have the mental faculties to understand? What do you think our elected officials do? Do you think they go and get climatology degrees from Cornell before voting on legislation? Heck no, it's people like Mike :eek1: , and me :hmm4: .This is where we might find some people actually qualified to discuss climate science research. Although very quickly I think we'll see how unqualified we are in comparison. Science forums realclimate.org, sciforums.com , or thescienceforum.com.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9002217#post9002217 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
and, doesn't it make sense to let the best scientific minds on the planet figure out the predominant theory, ajd not a bunch of aquarium nerds like us? The best minds in the worldwide scientific community have declared climate chang eot be a plausable risk, so who are we to question them from our couches? Lets leave the climate science to the actual climatologists at Harvard and Cornell.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9004681#post9004681 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
2) Leave the real climate science to the real climatologists....don't be naive enough to believe some fish geeks on their computers have the answers that the best minds in the worldwide scientific community missed.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9006814#post9006814 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Professional climatologists are qualified, not reefgeeks, lol. What makes you think any of the armchair scientists here know anything that the entire worldwide scientific community missed?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9007098#post9007098 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Compared to professional climatologists, YES, we're all relatively 'stupid' here on that subject.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9130549#post9130549 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
I think you completely misunderstood my point, but that response may in fact support the one I was making.
---------------------------------------------
I'm guessing a climate scientist would chuckle at the feeble attempts of a few fish geeks to grasp the depth of the climatology field. If you all really want to ask someone qualified, then try using the links to the science forums I posted . It's also a quick way to realize how unqualified we are on the subject.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9134585#post9134585 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
MC my sarcasm was merely illustrating how absurd this would sound to an actual climate scientist
A few college-level reef geeks are so far from qualified on the subject it's comical.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9135489#post9135489 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
This is where we might find some people actually qualified to discuss climate science research. Although very quickly I think we'll see how unqualified we are in comparison.
You truly are completely clueless. Have fun being an idiot.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9139157#post9139157 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
There's some places where you barely get the bait out of the can and the fish just start jumping into the boat it seems. Perhaps more amazing, is when they insist on doing it even when you're not fishing.
We agree that GW is real, that isn't what annoys me. It annoys me that you're passive aggressive, insulting, arrogant, and don't even realize it.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9143558#post9143558 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
(chuckle) indeed. This gets better by the minute. And s/he still doesn't even realize we agree. Priceless[insert MC commercial here]. Yaknow Hipp, if all your miguided hostility could be harnessed for electricity, we might solve the energy crisis right now. Where's the 'eating popcorn' smiley when i need it? Somebody hook it up.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9107982#post9107982 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefBuddha
Nobody is saying not to question. nobody is saying not to learn. But , imo, we should keep a grounded perspective in the fact that we are not actually climatologists...and we should realize that our opinions are baseless compared to the most learned professionals in the field.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9149383#post9149383 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by samtheman
What is a dead planet? Or do you mean one without humans? Do bacteria and insects exist? Or do you mean like the moon? No atmosphere and cold.
As for pretending Global Warming isn't a big issue, the latest from the UN says its inevitable and we can't stop it. So why not pretend its not an issue as we have no way to impact or change it.
When someone says "A consensus of scientists" and I ask, "Name one?" they should be able to name at least one or the name of an organization at least.