lousybreed
New member
You quote me, but your commentary seems to deal with other posters. I am arguing for the sake of growing chaeto- clearly. Only that I do not think always going to lighting, as the issue, really works on the right side of the equation for the case of the OP and mine, i.e. in an already established near zero nitrates and phosphates enviroment at least. It could simply be the nutrients are too low or some other element. We need to be clear on that..
Now I could see in what you have said about the reduction of need for GFO, as possibly suggesting that by letting the chaeto take more of the phosphate load more success with it will be had. In short (my take away) let phosphate rise till chaeto starts growing. But it would confirm what we needed to know from the get-go. If you want to benefit from chaeto you need slightly more phosphates to get it going. Which is where I was with this issue, and looking to see if this has been confirmed by others experience.
You are right, miss read your post. I now understand where you are coming from. I hear you that you have an ultra low nutrient tank. If I were you I would get the biggest ball of chaeto I could find, pull half of the gfo out, and let the algae settle in handling the load. Once you see success then keep backing off the gfo and let the algae continue to take over handling the phosphates. I went with a HPS lamp because I can almost guarantee you success. The tech has been around forever and it's a constant. All the bulbs put out the same basic spectrum. No guessing or experimenting. I like the 150w spotlights. I have a partially tumbling system but the fact that I am flowing water through the mass is what's important. It's getting the cleaned water away and bringing in new nutrients for the algae to consume. There are theories hat if you start with too small of a ball of chaeto it won't take off. Hope this helps!!