reincarnated 90 gallon pics

drbronx

Premium Member
Since it is a rainy day, I finally had an opportunity to take and post some pics of my new 90 gallon tank. This mixed reef is about 2 months old and holds some remnants from my old 125, and many newer additions as I move away from an sps dominated theme to a more softy and LPS dominated display.

IMG_3446.jpg


IMG_3445.jpg


IMG_3447.jpg


IMG_3449.jpg


IMG_3450.jpg


IMG_3451.jpg


That's all folks!!
 
Will do Vince. A number of folks have stated interest but you are first in line for all your assistance. I'll cut you a piece when I get back from vacation. While it is not the so called Todd's torch, it's coloration is pretty close due to the very bright green tips. I'd love to see it under some blue LEDs.
 
Jerry nice looking tank. Dosen't look 2 months old thats for sure. Nicely filled in. Can I ask why the move from SPS towards Softies and LPS?
 
Bunch of reasons Neoz:
1) Aesthetics - while sps dominated tanks are very impressive, I found that I missed the animation provided by the swaying of softies in the current. Plus I love the wide variety of dazzling colors and morphologies of the soft and LPS corals. Further, there is a large number of exciting new morphs of zoanthids, acans, lobos, chalices etc.coming out of Australia and other areas.
2) time/expense - due to my new life with a mixed family of four kiddies, I don't have the time or energy to meet the more exacting demands of sps corals. I have become a lazier reefer in my old age. Softies and LPS seem much more forgiving in their maintenance requirements. LPS and softies are also cheaper to maintain since I do fewer water changes, only run 175 w halides, and use far less calcium/alkalinity and other dosing elements etc.
3) Been there/done that - Since I already had an SPS dominated tank (for those that remember my 125) I already proved to myself that I can achieve a tank consisting of mature sps colonies. I loved the excitement of watching corals grow from little frags but before terribly long you have large colonies growing into each other. After I ran out of room I started to get a bit bored. Since I had to break the tank down in contemplation of moving to a new house I figured that would be a good time for a transition.

I will always love sps and I continue to maintain about 12 of my favorite varieties.
 
Thanks everyone. Yeah Captain C.: Nate and I had been talking about this for quite some time. I'm not sure we are trendsetters as much as pragmatists. Much of this was driven by pure necessity. I'd love to see if there is data on this but just here on our little forum, a number of us either left the hobby or scaled back during this current economic downturn. In any event, i think at some point we all need a little change and get the itch to mix things up.
 
By the way Vince: I'd love for you to take some photos. Mine are pretty lousy.

Captain C: I see you've been selling colonies. I'm sorry I didn't get to see your display in its fullest glory. I look forward to seeing the new incarnation of your new set-up as it develops.
 
Jerry, your motivations are the same as mine. SPS will always be my first love, and I'm sure some more tolerant corals will make it into the new tank. But, out of necessity, I have to go to a less demanding system with a more energy efficient footprint. So, easy tank is better than no tank at all.

Once the new one is up, I'm sure I'll post a little retrospective. I'll also be using you and Nate's tanks as inspiration....aka pirating ideas.
 
Jerry, can you elaborate about what the heart of the system consists of? Sump, return pump, lighting, internal flow, refugium, reactors.

Thanks,
Mark
 
Mark: It's never exciting to describe my systems since they tend to not be very sophisticated.

My tank is plumbed via two glass holes 700gph overflow boxes to a 30 gallon below the tank sump. On one side i have a Reef Octopus 150 skimmer with a gate valve mod (Very basic but does a great job). The two water drain lines empty into a large filter sock in which I place charcoal and GFO pellets. There are three baffles and a media tray (designed by Nate the Great) that separates the skimmer compartment from the return compartment. the return pump is a Mag 9.5. I have a water top-off system (two float valve diy kit) that is fed kalkwasser water from an adjacent Brute conatainer. Lighting is provided by two 175 watt 10 k XM halides and two 110 watt actinic VHO. halides are driven by a Blueline dual ballast and the actinics by an Icecap 440. I do monthly 30 gallon water changes, scrape the glass on occasion and thats about it. I'm not big on additives but I do add two cups of magnesium every water change. I have not tested parameters since I set up the tank. I don't even own test kits at this point outside of a thermometer and ph meter. I just look at my red sea xenia and they are my barometer for tank conditions. If they are happy and pulsing then i know life is good. Thats about the whole scoop. I am a simple reefer.
 
I like your style! No calcium supplementation? I'll be simplifying quite a bit too. Trying to decide on keeping the Ca reactor going or not. A lot of folks in the zoanthids forum swear by keeping the parameters close to that of stony reefs.
 
MarK: Using kalkwasser in my top-off seems to keep Ca and Alk well within a good range. My sps grow like mad and I have to constantly scrape away coralline algae from the glass. I agree that regardless of what corals one attempts to grow, we should always strive for optimal tank parameters to have good results. It is just easier without large numbers of calcium and fllow "hungry" sps. By the way my internal flow is provided by the two returns from the Mag return pump as well as a Seio 1400, a Rio Magnum 5 (both of which are on all the time) as well as occasional blasts from a Maximod 1200 which is on a timer. All equipment feeds into a DJ 8 toggle switch rack which is the best reef investment I ever made.
 
Jerry, how often are you cleaning your skimmer?

(Please see my skimmer post in URS)

I'm trying to decide on a new skimmer for next tank. I don't think I need a beast like I have for my heavy bioload low nutrient system anymore. But if I run the water a little "dirtier", will the skimmer fill up faster, thus requiring a higher rated skimmer???

Your thoughts?
(sorry for unintentional hi-jack)
 
Mark: Sorry for the delay...I've been away. What sized tank will you be using? What skimmer are you running now?
 
Back
Top