rock density/porosity

bues0022

New member
I was reading elsewhere in another thread that one person (that I found so far) didn't like the TBS LR because they thought it was too dense (making it very heavy in the tank). The density they ssaid was that it didn't have a large number of micropores which then in turn didn't allow enough places for beneficial bacteria to grow. They also thought the rocks looked too much like regular rocks and didn't look nice in the tank. I was wondering what all of you thought about this? How does TBS LR stack up against against "the competitor?"
 
bues0022

The competitors rock doesn't have all the micro and macro living organizisms already in the rock. As far as the porousity, I requested rock with many holes any crevices to provide many hiding places for the critters that come on and in the rock.

If your concerned about look and weight than do what I did; buy light porous rock as base then seed it with the TBS rock on top, it will eventually become live.

You will not find rock this live coming from competitors that keep the rock for long periods out of water in the sun, after stripping it of all live matter before boxing and shipping. :D
 
Do you want pores or life?
I am a proud owner of the package and have to say yes the base rock is a little boulder-ish, but man the decorator rock in part 2... man that stuff is nice.
 
Man my rock the first part of the package is so holey every day im finding more bad crabs. There so much life and its pretty heavy but porous at the same time. Remember the rock he is using comes form an old seabed that was mined and he seeds the rock himself. Not naturally stripping a reef down unlike some others.
 
I got a nice mixture of both "rockish" and pourus. Those ones that just look like rocks, are nice and square and easy to stack- kinda nice when you have to stack 220 lbs of rock. Besides the life you get in those rocks are going to dig tunnels in them, and make themselves at home.

Not sure about the microhole part not growing bacteria, since most everyone posting here had cycles of less than 2 weeks, and several have posted picture of their tanks and have kept sponges alive for a year +.
 
I have had my package for a week and starting already to see diatoms. So about another week and I can get my second part of my package for the CUC. Also so the most awesome thing tonight broke out the flashlight and saw a full spaghetti worm finding a new home. Wife and I sat there and watched it for an hour. So cool. :D
 
Thanks for the replies, but they are mostly looking at forms of macro life - things we can see with our eyes. I'm concerned with micro organisms. Regardless of where the rock came from, eventually it will become live in our tanks. So, lets say a year from now, which rock will be "better" for my tank. I am making the wild assumption (which may very well not be true) that TBS rock is more dense than "the competitor". More dense = less pores = less anaerobic bacterial browth = nitrate buildup possibility. (does this logic make sense?) If so, does TBS rock still hold enough porosity to keep enough anaerobic bacteria to keep tank chemical levels in check with minimal human intervention? My thoughts are that it really doesn't matter where the rock originated. As long as it's not a hunk of granite with no pores, live rock likely has the ability to sustain enough anaerobic bacteria to keep things under control.

I'm mainly asking this question as a reassurance to myself of the last statement above. I believe that what TBS is doing is awesome and will likely be ordering when I finally set up my tank. I'm just trying to do all my research first so I don't make any expensive mistakes! Thanks again for the input.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9798057#post9798057 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by bues0022
Thanks for the replies, but they are mostly looking at forms of macro life - things we can see with our eyes. I'm concerned with micro organisms. Regardless of where the rock came from, eventually it will become live in our tanks. So, lets say a year from now, which rock will be "better" for my tank. I am making the wild assumption (which may very well not be true) that TBS rock is more dense than "the competitor". More dense = less pores = less anaerobic bacterial browth = nitrate buildup possibility. (does this logic make sense?) If so, does TBS rock still hold enough porosity to keep enough anaerobic bacteria to keep tank chemical levels in check with minimal human intervention? My thoughts are that it really doesn't matter where the rock originated. As long as it's not a hunk of granite with no pores, live rock likely has the ability to sustain enough anaerobic bacteria to keep things under control.

I'm mainly asking this question as a reassurance to myself of the last statement above. I believe that what TBS is doing is awesome and will likely be ordering when I finally set up my tank. I'm just trying to do all my research first so I don't make any expensive mistakes! Thanks again for the input.


You are talking apples and oranges here....

I have head this a zillion times and never made comment...but here goes...

First of all Fiji and all the imported live rock is not 'rock' at all but coral skeleton.......ever pick up a piece of dead coral on the beach?

It is light, fragile and porous. Great for reef tanks, but unfortunately due to collection/handling/shipping techniques, is very devoid of any viable life as the way it has to be treated from Fiji to you is in a dry condition and the life on it is in rough shape by the time it gets in your tank, and then is a candidate for "curing"....basically bringing dead rock back to life, which is a good thing for folks who like the look of imported rock, eventually it will come around and usually so some signs of life.

Aquacultured live rock is just that "rock', not coral skeleton.

Ever pick up a rock on the shoreline, or at the lake?

It is heavier, and has less porosity that coral fragments. That is why I go to great effort to use only the best substrate "rock" for aquaculture. It is real coral rock-eons old coral reef, compacted and resulting in coral rock.

I also go to great lengths to provide a real live rock, which has life growing on it. This is accomplished by culturing it in the ocean, harvesting by scuba diving, transported underwater to the warehouse, packed underwater and expeditiously transported to you via air freight , underwater, so the life on the rock actually survives for you viewing in the tank.

The two products are totally different, although they will accomplish the same goal, it boils down to apples and oranges.....volkswagons and Cadillacs...they both do the same thing, just on different levels.

Without live rock imports from Fiji, there would be a huge hole in the industry, as the demand for live "rock" far outweighs the ability of domestic production, which is why you see Fiji rock in all the shops.

If there was billions of pounds of cultured domestic rock available, you would see it in all the shops as it is highly sought after. I get multiple calls a day for shops wanting my live rock, but unfortunately, I cannot produce enough for my retail customers as it is, otherwise I could fill the multiple orders for aquacultured live rock on a wholesale basis and it would be in your LFS.

As it stands now, I cannot provide any rock to the shops, as I am constantly backordered for sales to yall.

If I could produce more I certainly would like to see my rock in your LFS, but it is just not logistically possible.

This statement you made is the answer

""My thoughts are that it really doesn't matter where the rock originated. As long as it's not a hunk of granite with no pores, live rock likely has the ability to sustain enough anaerobic bacteria to keep things under control.""



Does that provide a little more insight into your question?

Richard TBS

:rollface: :rollface: :rollface:
 
Richard - That does help a lot. My largest concern was the statement someone made about your rock not being able to support enough bacterial growth to be benificial to the tank. I'm glad that is just not true. My other concern about athstetics and some thinking your rock is "boulder like" is just a cosmetic issue. Yes, it may be more rock-like, but that's what it is - rocks. I can change that by aquascaping, or supplementing with fiji rock if need be. In the end, the rock will hopefully be almost covered up with all kinds of corals, algaes, critters etc so it won't matter a ton. Thanks for the reasurance, and I'll be letting you know when I'm finally ready to order.
 
The two products are totally different, although they will accomplish the same goal, it boils down to apples and oranges.....volkswagons and Cadillacs...they both do the same thing, just on different levels.


Hey I drive a Volkswagen what you trying to imply. :lol:
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9800723#post9800723 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by scowiii
The two products are totally different, although they will accomplish the same goal, it boils down to apples and oranges.....volkswagons and Cadillacs...they both do the same thing, just on different levels.


Hey I drive a Volkswagen what you trying to imply. :lol:

was my first car! a bug.....

Worked at McDonalds for $1.65 an hour...paid $250.00 for it....was a wonderful car.....but not like my Ford F-250 p/u!!

Richard TBS
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9800723#post9800723 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by scowiii

Hey I drive a Volkswagen what you trying to imply. :lol: [/B]

...that you don't have much room for anaerobic bacteria? :lol:
 
Haha. My wife's family were all VW nuts and basically kinda turned me into one. But now my wife and I drive a Toaster the Scion xb so we are turning into Toyota people now. But still have the VW when the other cars breakdown.
 
Back
Top