<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7058228#post7058228 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefSalt
or do you want it for FREE lol....
That's how all but one manufacturer's wavemakers work - and people call that variable flow<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7059460#post7059460 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by dhnguyen
Going from flow to no flow isn't exactly what I would call varying IMO.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7059508#post7059508 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by MiddletonMark
That's how all but one manufacturer's wavemakers work - and people call that variable flow![]()
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7059038#post7059038 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by reef_dude76
Since the controller will not alternate pumps, why can't we just hook up two different size pumps to the same controller. Say a 1500 and a 800 or whatever. Even though they don't alternate, at least one would be stronger than the other and give some kind of varying flow pattern, especially if the Seio output stream is run through the output stream of the sump return.
Just a thought.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7060387#post7060387 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Spuds725
this gave me an idea-- you can run a 1500 and a 1100 pointed at each other-- the 1500 on the controller and the 1100 on constant--- (or any unmatched pair of seios)
the 1500 would vary flow between 500 to 1500 gph while the 1100 would put out 1100 gph constant-- this should alternate flow nicely as they alternate which has the most flow---
You could control 2 as long as they push against seperate constant flow sources...
I'm actually more interested in these now thinking this through-- its not a tunze-- don't try to compare it--
when given lemons......
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7060441#post7060441 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mwood
It would work and is a good idea, but do you want to pay $350 to "make it work" or do you think the controller should be a touch less than $200.