coralfragger101
Gone Postal
Up until now, I've glued everything. Redoing the overflow I'm working on today I will pressure fit most of the parts within the overflow box. Anything outside the box will definately be glued.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12623574#post12623574 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Veni vidi vici
Ok BeanAnimal, Its crunch time.Im waiting on plumbing parts so i took a few to draw up a sketch of my intentions.I would gladly take any advice you have.Oh i didnt put it on sketch but all my pipeing on the C2C is 1.5"
![]()
i was thinking the first 90 gets me into the stand and over the sump and the 2nd shoots straight down into sump.Im trying to keep things uncluttered and neat,unless........ its going to affect performance of design.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12626565#post12626565 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by MeuserReef
Why not accomplish the turn to the sump with (2) 45° fittings, rather than the two 90° fittings?
Unless someone with the first hand knowledge has an explanation on why not to use 90s ,ill probably use them.Ill let you know if its noisy or not.Im only going to be pushing around 500gph or 4x the total system volume per hour through the overflow system,so we shall see.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12627172#post12627172 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Siffy
On the siphon channel it's a moot point whether to use 90s or 45s as it's being restricted anyway. It's also pretty irrelevant on the other 2 as they see such little flow. Noise difference between 45s and 90s would be the only consideration. That's one I'd be curious to know if there's a difference. Whatever looks the cleanest and keeps the pipes out of the way is what I'd use.