mojo~
Skimmer Guy
Figure this might be the best spot for this...
I wrote skimz to ask them which Skimmer for my 40gallon total.volume would work and they are telling me the 181 will be just fine...but according to most on here it will have issues...
So I'm not sure what to think...my sump came off my 65gallon cube, so its a bigger sump, so some of the recommendations of ones like BM 3.5 are just not tall enough the really clear the top of the sump...
I was thinking the 121 or 161, but They are not cones, so I know They are not as efficient...so that's why I'm considering the 181 it says it will work on a 52 gallon tank...
The swc180 I have now does fine for the most part, it keeps its head fairly well, dumps some in the cup but also has stuff at the top of the neck...however my bio-load is super light right now, only 3 fish...and all 1" long...so not big at all. I'm thinking as a few more fish are added and I feed a few times a day it will perform better...I will have filefish and be feeding multiple times a day so I need something to be able to handle That with zero issue.
but the swc180 has a 3" neck and the skims 181 has a 4" neck and after reading that seems to cause people to believe it will not be very consistent, so if the 3" is fairly consistent but not super consistent I'm normative sure what the 4" neck would do with a heavier bio-load and a pump That moves less air.
So I'm at a bit of a loss...skimz says the 181 will be fine as opposed to the 121 or 161...but others say not the case.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
40g total volume... Honestly all the skimz line is too large. For them to tell you the 181 would work is insane. I agree the bm nac 3 , the tunze 9002, something with a smaller neck.