SPS and T5s only

T5 ARE definatly good enough for SPS and in some ways better than halide for SPS. MH do work great as well. Both have trade offs though. MH have the advantage of the shimmer lines which is the main reason alot of people dont want to drop thier MH. T5 tend to use less watts, last longer, produce more evenly colored SPS and dont heat up the tank as much.
 
Horace-
I noticed you are using T5s for LPS growth too...what do you have in there and how are they growing? Ive heard some LPS dont do well with T5s
 
I have 2 frogspawns and a galaxy coral right now. The galaxy grows very fast and does very well. The frogspawns seem to look pretty good, but they arent growing very fast. There could be a number of causes to this though other than lights.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6892203#post6892203 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Horace
T5 ARE definatly good enough for SPS and in some ways better than halide for SPS. MH do work great as well. Both have trade offs though. MH have the advantage of the shimmer lines which is the main reason alot of people dont want to drop thier MH. T5 tend to use less watts, last longer, produce more evenly colored SPS and dont heat up the tank as much.
How are T5s better for SPS corals than halides?
 
I don think anyone is saying one is better than the other, just that its possible, and both have advantages and disadvantages.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6897744#post6897744 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Nyyanks154
I don think anyone is saying one is better than the other, just that its possible, and both have advantages and disadvantages.
Well, someone in this thread did mention that T5s are better than halides.

I would like to know the basis for this statement.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6898607#post6898607 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by honkit
Well, someone in this thread did mention that T5s are better than halides.

I would like to know the basis for this statement.

Horace said they use less watts, last longer, give off less heat, and give more even color. I don't know if T5's give more even color than MH, but I did choose them over MH because of the first three reasons - I see less watts/less heat as being "better" for me and my 58G tank.

I also get nice growth and color with my T5's.

-Mike
 
T5's give off uniform intensity over the length and width of the tank. Whereas halides are strongest directly under them and get weaker as you go away from this center point. The homogenous illumination might lead to more evenly colored sps over the entire tank but the same is possible with halides if you take this into consideration while aquascaping.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6900100#post6900100 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kimoyo
T5's give off uniform intensity over the length and width of the tank. Whereas halides are strongest directly under them and get weaker as you go away from this center point. The homogenous illumination might lead to more evenly colored sps over the entire tank but the same is possible with halides if you take this into consideration while aquascaping.

This is not REALLY true...but partially. The main reason T5 give better color is because they are not single point source light like MH is. T5 illuminate the entire tank VERY well and much more of each coral is getting intense light because its not all coming from the top like MH. In T5 tanks more of the coral is illuminated from the sides and to a lesser extent the bottom of the coral, much more so than occurs in MH tanks. If you look at the corals in a MH tank the tops of them are very bright color, but the sides and bottom are often very brown. In a T5 tank this still occurs, but to a much lesser extent.

That is the reason why many SPS growers like T5 better for even coloration.
 
Re: SPS and T5s only

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6892063#post6892063 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Nyyanks154
Can you grow SPS with T5 only

Yes

or is the general opinion you need MHs?

You don't need MH. I think that most people prefer them. MH is just a completely different look.

With what available in today's lighting market, meeting the basic light needs of the coral is pretty easy. Most of the lighting after the basic need of the coral have been met are a matter of personal preference.

IMO, I think most people prefer the look of MH.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6900695#post6900695 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Horace
This is not REALLY true...but partially.

Umm..what's not true about what I said?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6900787#post6900787 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kimoyo
Umm..what's not true about what I said?

"the same is possible with halides if you take this into consideration while aquascaping"

That is not entirely true. While careful aquascaping does help, you still will never get the light coverage that an array of T5s give you.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6902183#post6902183 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Horace
"the same is possible with halides if you take this into consideration while aquascaping"

That is not entirely true. While careful aquascaping does help, you still will never get the light coverage that an array of T5s give you.

MH bulbs aren't point sources but I understand what you mean. There are reflectors available to hobbyist that take the spread of MH bulbs into consideration and put out very collimated light.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7084243#post7084243 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Ti
MH is point source.

I don't have any MH bulbs anymore but I thought they had quartz tubes in them? If they do, then they are not point sources.
 
Back
Top