tonyespinoza
Premium Member
I've asked this before, but didn't get a lot of opinions... Interested to see if this alternative way of posing the question might elicit more insights.
My system will have:
363g display (70 x 60 x 20)
275g fuge (62 x 57 x 18)
BK 300 External (fed by gravity at 300 GPH)
Secondary Beckett-injected skimmer off the sump
Red Dragon Closed Loop (SPS-level circulation)
The display is in my living room and I'm trying to keep it as clean and simple as possible aesthetically. The tank is up against the wall, so the overflow will be internal. I'm considering having the overflow be fairly small (say 12" wide).
So what price might I be paying for going with a smaller overflow? Is there any evidence to support the need for large calfo-style overflows on systems with heavy turnover and skimming? I'd also like my CL feed to be up high closer to the surface, away from the sand, so not only will it be disrupting the surface tension with flow, it will also be recirculating the water at about 20x - 25x.
Any thoughts?
My system will have:
363g display (70 x 60 x 20)
275g fuge (62 x 57 x 18)
BK 300 External (fed by gravity at 300 GPH)
Secondary Beckett-injected skimmer off the sump
Red Dragon Closed Loop (SPS-level circulation)
The display is in my living room and I'm trying to keep it as clean and simple as possible aesthetically. The tank is up against the wall, so the overflow will be internal. I'm considering having the overflow be fairly small (say 12" wide).
So what price might I be paying for going with a smaller overflow? Is there any evidence to support the need for large calfo-style overflows on systems with heavy turnover and skimming? I'd also like my CL feed to be up high closer to the surface, away from the sand, so not only will it be disrupting the surface tension with flow, it will also be recirculating the water at about 20x - 25x.
Any thoughts?