t5 versus metal halide

The heat is equal to the watts with either MH or T5.

I like the natural look of a point source MH over more. IMO
 
True, but the most economical t-5s are from sunlight supply and they are tiny little lights that have to be hung on a shelf above or some other hanging fixture created. So as long as there is a few inches of space all around then there's no need to worry about the heat. I also don't see why it's necessary to have a bright and glaring reflector. My husband created a cheap fixture out of pvc pipe and attatched my t-5s to it and my vegetables grow just fine without the reflectors. By doing it ourselves, we have saved 150s per homemade fixture. I have more lights on order...back order and very late grrr.... for my new tank. Since I positioned the stand and tank under a bookshelf between 2 Ikea drawer type/bookshelves, the lights will be installed about 4 inches above my tank.

Anyway, I just think metal halide is completely unecessary. But I guess I'll find out. The other thing I like about the t-5s is how easy it is to string them together. They will run up to 8 lights on the same plug in and they just plug from one fixture to the other nice and easy. So I bought 4 and can easily leave space on each side to install 2 more on each side whenever I desire. 8 t-5s is a TON of light! :) I can't really imagine needing that much. But I might want to try the more difficult corals someday.

Suzi
 
Grow lights and aquaurium lights are very different.Comparing the two is well like apples and tomatoes or is it oranges.

I've observed many aquariums with t5 lighting . For me metal halide and vho supplementation can not be beat aestheticaly. REad up and look at different combinations before you by. I personally use hamilton 250w SE MH and Vho actinic and haven't seen anything better to my taste.
 
Actually, that's not really true. The growlights I use in my growroom come in all the same spectrum choices that are required by reef tanks. I have bought the blue attinic bulbs and the other lights that come with them will be ok to use until they are burned out. The basic t-5 fixture will accept any kind of light spectrum available in t-5s. I ordered my fixtures through my LFS and wish I had gotten them from my normal supplier. I could have had them 5 times over in the time I have been waiting for the LFS.


Suzi
 
Wow this is definately a thread slamming on t5's.

It really depends on what the original poster wants. He/She should see different tanks and judge for themselves. I've seen people switch from MH -> T5 and were happy and I've seen people who switched back to MH because they weren't happy with the T5's.

I personally have the T5's and am very happy with them. I will say that even though many have mentioned that MH and T5's produce the same amount of heat, the hottest my tank gets during the summer in california is about 81 degrees WITHOUT a chiller. You can believe what you want with T5's dispersing heat over a larger area, yaddy yaddy yaddy... but by maintaining a tank WITHOUT a chiller is so much nicer during the summer.

There are lots of opinions about either lights, but I've been very happy with the growth on my tank and do think that my corals color up very nicely even nicer than some MH tanks... Each to their own! Cheers!
 
T5's are a good way to go. Both ways are close really.

I like the way a MH lights a display better. IMO
 
That would depend upon what type of unit (# of bulbs), and what type of bulbs you purchase (# of daylight vs actinic)...

I'm using a mix on my tank... The one thing everyone seems to love with MH's is the shimmer effect it has on the water.
 
Each his own is wise advice. Look at different systems in operation before you buy and pick something you personaly like

Suzi, How can you judge the aesthetics of a grow light for an aquarium? No water to shine through, no corals to color, etc?Maybe it's not like apples and oranges;more like choosing a car to use as a boat.
 
I think there is HUGE misconception about T5's. If its a good T5 setup with individual reflectors, you can grow ANYTHING you can grow under MH. I'm able to keep SPS and grow them on the bottom of my tank. I have a 90g. Not super deep, but I think it does a good job penetrating the tank.
 
Even if you get similar par,arguably. The single point lighting provided by mh is more similar to the single point light of the sun,in my opinion. The shimmer is reflective of the surface and tends to pulse the light in a way more diffuse systems don't for what it's worth.
 
Well I've spent about 1200 dollars on lights of all types and spectrums in the last year experimenting in my growroom. I agree that it may take some tweaking to find what I want. But, the point is that the fixture is the same no matter which type of bulbs I end up using. I know there are probably thousands of fixtures out there. But the ones I have on order have tons of options for bulbs. It's about mixing the colors. The blue lights are going to offset the other colors. I don't think most people realize how many different types of bulbs are out there!

Suzi
 
Children, children. Basically it all comes down to this:
T-5 and MH solely is based on opnions.
They are the same, a T-5 with individual reflector driven with a good ballast can perform and sometime outperform MH. Depending on your color combination you can grow anything and gain outstanding color. T-5 are under rated in terms of par because you can use up 12 bulbs or 8 bulb combinations. The bluer the better. etc. etc. etc. Just read up. Look at this thread:
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2007-10/totm/index.php

You also have to remember growing corals rely on various factors:
Stability (params)
Skimming
Lighting

So if you like the shimmer go with a MH set up. VHOs are good for supplementation. HTH and I hope I covered most of it.
 
Children, children.

Notihng like a bit o condescention to make my day. Thanks for taking a patronizing minute to share your wisdom.
 
Back
Top