and how they are captured and treated is an important part.
Um, no I didn't. What are you looking at?
and how they are captured and treated is an important part.
This is not exactly the meaning of my question, but oh well, I should have been clearer.
If you have say 10 tangs all properly quarantined, but place them all in an infected tank or under stressful conditions... will they be ich free just because they were quarantined? Absolutely not!... Some might be (or not?) prone to get infected faster than others (due to a lot of reasons, I suppose, and could species be one of these reasons?). If they are exposed to the pathogen, they have a good chance to get infected again, even being previously quarantined, IMHO.
All tangs would be at the top of any list of fish to avoid in an ich-managed" tank.
The following drivel is just my opinion and experience and I have too much idle time today; so bear with me. Personally, I would never keep an "ich-managed" tank. I think any such tank is living on borrowed time, some last a very long time, some go next week. But, IMO & IME, all will get the parasite in deadly numbers sometime. In any case; I believe ich-managed" tanks are only for expert aquarists who can recognize problems before they happen and are willing to take a big risk.I'm getting closer to something I'd like to know and it's taking a better shape now: starting from this statement and assuming that a lot of people (still) have these kind of tanks, are all tang species equally resistant/non-resistant? It seems that people have different reports on how fast they get sick like cabinetman123's example above - hence another reason for the question. It might be just a coincidence or is it really these species (rather than healthier specific individuals which might have sort of a natural "immunity" - even though it's not a full immunity) that can get sicker faster?